期刊文献+

铬渣污染场地土壤电动修复研究 被引量:7

Electrokinetic remediation to the chromiumcontaminated soils
下载PDF
导出
摘要 以青岛某化工厂铬渣污染场地土壤为对象,研究了原位电动技术修复的铬去除率、迁移特征,以及电动修复前后土壤中铬形态的变化。结果表明,土壤总铬(Cr(T))质量比为7850mg/kg,大部分3价铬(Cr(Ⅲ))质量比为6464mg/kg。施加1 V/cm直流电压,电动修复4,6d后,6价铬(Cr(Ⅵ))以含氧阴离子的形式向阳极迁移,去除率在32%-44%,Cr(T)的去除率在5.1%~8.7%,去除效率较低,主要是因为土壤中大部分Cr(Ⅲ)以Cr(OH)3沉淀存在,在电场作用下较难发生迁移。污染土壤中的铬以有机物与硫化物结合态为主(占38.0%),同时存在大量的残渣态铬(占54.4%),可还原提取态铬所占比例最少(占1.5%)。电动运行后醋酸可提取态的铬比例有所降低,可还原提取态和有机物与硫化物结合态比例稍减小,对以残渣态存在的铬也几乎不产生影响。 The paper is engaged in a study on the electrokinetic re- mediation efficiency for the chromium-contaminated soil sites in Qing- dao due to the migration of chromiumalong with the change of chromi- um behavior in the contamination process. The results of our study show that the concentration of the total chromium [Cr(T) ] in the soil increased to 7 850 mg/kg, most of which is at presence in the form of trivalent chromium [ Cr( Ⅲ ) ] with the concentration of 6 464 mg/kg. After a 4 - 6 days of remediation with 1 V/cm DC voltage, Cr( Ⅵ ) in soil, which exists as an oxyanion, turns to migrate to the anode, the removal efficiency of which can be made as high as 32% -44%, though the removal efficiency of Cr(T) could only be made to reach 5.1% - 8.7%. It was mainly because that most of Cr( Ⅲ ) in the soil is existing as Cr(OH)3, which is believed to be hard to migrate under the influence of the electric field. The problem can be thought to get somewhat improved as the result of adjusting the pH value by adding NaOH and acetic acid to the electrodes. For its special man- ner of distribution, the presence of chromium in the soil is mainly due to the organic matter(38.0% ) and residual(54.4% ), and the con- tent of chromium left overby the iron and manganese oxides at least ( 1.5 % ). After the reaction, the part of chromium which would be turned into weak acid, which can be basically reduced via extrac-tion, where at the cathode side it can be reduced from 1 693 mg/kg to 578 mg/kg. Chromium content bound to iron and manganese turns to get some-what decreased to make isequal to or less than other kinds of organic matters and residual. However, the residual chromium is hardly influenced by the electrokinetic remediation. Therefore, it can only be removed from the contaminated soil through electrokinetic re- mediation. The technology that is available for the removal from the soils at different permeability. And, therefore, whether the removal efficiency can be made high depends on the soil and the type of pollu- tion. The initial valence of chromium in the contaminated soil is like- ly to be affected more or less by the removal. However, on the most biological effective part, the chromium ingredients in the soil were weak, which can be extracted by using acid. Then, with the help of acid, it would be easy to remove the contaminant content of the chromium and in turn the environmental risk caused by the chromium will be able to get reduced and even ehminated to a great extent.
出处 《安全与环境学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2013年第5期56-60,共5页 Journal of Safety and Environment
基金 环保公益性行业科研专项项目(201009009-04) 中国环境科学研究院中央级公益性科研院所基本科研业务专项资助项目(2013-YKY-006)
关键词 环境工程学 电动修复 铬渣 土壤污染 铬形态 environmental engineering electrokinetic remediation chromium-containing slag soil pollution speciation ofchromium
  • 相关文献

参考文献22

  • 1顾继光,周启星,王新.土壤重金属污染的治理途径及其研究进展[J].应用基础与工程科学学报,2003,11(2):143-151. 被引量:279
  • 2XU Zhongjian(许中坚), SHI Hongwen(史红文), QIU Xiyang(邱喜阳). Uptake and bioconcentration of heavy metals by vegetables around a lead-zinc smeltery. J湖南科技大学学报: 自然科学版, 2008, 23(4): 107-110.
  • 3CHEN Chuanhong(陈传红). Study on China's environmental protection and ecological environment construction technology development strategy in early twenty-first Century(21世纪初期中国环境保护与生态环境建设科技发展战略研究)[M]. Beijing: China Environmental Science Press, 2001: 10-11.
  • 4NIVAS B T, SABATINI D A, SHIAU B J, et al. Surfactant enhanced remediation of subsurface chromium contamination[J]. Water Research, 1996, 30(3): 511-520.
  • 5PROCTOR D M, FREDRICK M M, SCOTT P K, et al. The prevalence of chromium allergy in the United States and its implications for setting soil cleanup: a cost-effectiveness case study[J]. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology, 1998, 28(1): 27-37.
  • 6CHAI Liyuan, HUANG Shunhong, YANG Zhihui, et al. Cr(VI) remediation by indigenous bacteria in soils contaminated by chromium-containing slag[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2009, 167(1/2/3): 516-522.
  • 7LU Ping, FENG Qiyan, MENG Qingjun, et al. Electrokinetic remediation of chromium-and cadmium-contaminated soil from abandoned industrial site[J]. Separation and Purification Technology, 2012, 98: 216-220.
  • 8ACAR Y B, ALSHAWABKEH A N. Principles of electrokinetic remediation[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 1993, 27(13): 2638-2647.
  • 9GENT D B, BRICKA R M, ALSHAEABKEH A N, et al. Bench and field-scale evaluation of chromium and cadmium extraction by electrokinetics[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2004, 110(1/2/3): 53-62.
  • 10VIRKUTYTE J, SILLANPAA M, LATOSTENMAA P. Electrokinetic soil remediation-critical overview[J]. The Science of Total Environment, 2002, 289: 97-121.

二级参考文献63

共引文献521

同被引文献121

引证文献7

二级引证文献72

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部