期刊文献+

煤中形态硫在不同燃烧前预处理过程的脱除行为 被引量:2

The Removal Behavior of Sulfur Forms in Coal During Different Pretreatment Before Coal Combustion
原文传递
导出
摘要 利用ASTM形态硫分析法和X射线光电子能谱法(XPS)分析了田沟(TG)和胜利(SL)煤中不同形态硫组分及含量,在煤燃烧前通过过氧乙酸和NaOH/KOH溶液进行洗煤预处理以及不同温度和气氛下的温和热解预处理,分析煤中形态硫在不同的燃前预处理过程中的脱除行为.结果表明,酸/碱洗煤通过选择性氧化和亲核置换反应能有效脱除煤中黄铁矿硫、易分解的有机硫和部分难分解的苯并噻吩等有机硫;燃烧前温和热解预处理可使煤中含硫组分分解释放,微氧化性热解气氛能促进C-S键断裂,其对煤中黄铁矿硫和不稳定有机硫的脱除有明显促进,对稳定有机硫化物的脱除影响不大。 Different forms of sulfur in TianGou (TG) and ShengLi (SL) coals were identified by using X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), the two coals were pre-treated by two-step washing using peroxyacetic acid and NaOH/KOH solutions and also pyrolyzed in a fix-bed reactor under different atmospheres. Different pre-treatment methods were used to investigate the removal characteristics of different sulfur forms in coal. The results show that, via selective oxidation and nucleophilic displacement reaction, the coal-washing pretreatment could effectively remove pyrite, most unstable organic sulfur and sulfate and even part of hard decomposition organic sulfur. The mild thermal pyrolysis made the sulfur compounds release further. Oxygen can selectively break C-S bonds, which could promote to remove pyrite and unstable organic sulfur but have little effect on the stable thiophene.
出处 《工程热物理学报》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2013年第11期2170-2173,共4页 Journal of Engineering Thermophysics
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(No.51006042 No.51021065) 湖北省自然科学基金(No.2012FFB02602)
关键词 氧化 碱洗 热解 XPS 脱硫 oxidation caustic-washing pyrolysis XPS desulfurization
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献20

  • 1赵金成,胡旭东,高晋生.煤热解中有机硫的变化[J].煤炭转化,1993,16(2):76-81. 被引量:13
  • 2刘粉荣,李文,李保庆,陈皓侃.氧化性气氛下流化床中煤的热解脱硫及硫的分布[J].燃料化学学报,2006,34(4):404-407. 被引量:17
  • 3U. S. EPA. A study of hazardous air pollutant emissions from electric utility steam generating units : final report to congress , EPA-453/R-98-004a[R]. Washington, DC: U.S.Government Printing Office: 1998.
  • 4Minami W, Xu Z, Kim H. Mercury removal characteristics during thermal upgrading of fractionated alberta subbituminous coal [J]. Energy Fuels, 2007, 21(6): 3607-3611.
  • 5Iwashita A, Tanamachi S, Nakajima T, et al, Removal of mercury from coal by mild pyrolysis and leaching behavior of mercury [J]. Fuel, 2004, 83(6): 631-638.
  • 6Gryglewicz G, Jasienko S. The behavior of sulfur forms during pyrolysis of low-rankcoal[J]. Fuel, 1992, 71(11): 1225-1229.
  • 7Miura K, Mae K, Shimada M, et al. Analysis of formation rates of sulphur-containing gases during the pyrolysis of various coals[J]. Energy Fuels, 2001, 15(3): 629-636.
  • 8Thorpe AN, Senfile F E, Alexander C C, et al. Oxidation of pyrite in coaltomagnetite[J]. Fuel, 1984, 63(5): 662-668.
  • 9Levy J H., White T J. The reaction of Pyrite with Water Vapour[J]. Fuel, 1988, 67(10): 1336-1339.
  • 10Sugawara K, Kamoshita T, TkioY, et al. Dynamic behavior of sulfur forms inrapid pyrolysis of density-separated coals[J]. Fuel, 1994, 73(7): 1224-1228.

共引文献10

同被引文献10

引证文献2

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部