期刊文献+

Mast Quadrant微创系统下腰椎单侧固定椎间融合术的疗效对照研究 被引量:4

Clinical effect of lumbar unilateral fixed intervertebral fusion via Mast Quadrant minimally invasive system
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨MastQuadrant微创系统下腰椎单侧固定椎间融合术的可行性和有效性。方法对2010-05—2012-05在该院接受MastQuadrant微创系统下腰椎单侧固定椎间融合术22例(微创单侧组)和接受开放腰椎双侧固定椎间融合术25例(开放双侧组)作疗效对比观察。结果微创单侧组的切VI长度、手术时间、术中出血量、术后住院时间和术后伤口疼痛持续时间均少(短)于开放双侧组(P均〈0.01)。术后1年疗效评估,微创单侧组的13本骨科学下腰痛评分系统(JOA)评分高于开放双侧组(P〈0.01),视觉模拟评分法(VAS)评分低于开放双侧组(P〈0.01)。两组椎间隙高度、椎间融合率比较差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。结论MastQuadrant微创系统下腰椎单侧固定椎间融合术与传统开放腰椎双侧固定椎间融合术相比,在恢复椎间隙高度、提高椎间融合率、重建腰椎稳定性方面具有同样的临床效果,而微创单侧固定椎间融合术更具有手术创伤小、手术时间短、术后恢复快、并发症少等优点。 Objective To discussed the feasibility,validity and effect of lumbar unilateral fixed intervertebral fusion via Mast Quadrant minimally invasive system. Methods From May 2010 to May 2012,in our hospital,there were 22 patients undergoing surgery of lumbar unilateral fixed intervertebral fusion via Mast Quadrant minimally inva- sive system (the minimally invasive and unilateral fixed group), and 25 patients undergoing open surgery of lumbar bi- lateral fixed intervertebral fusion ( the open and bilateral fixed group). Results In these respects such as length of in- cision, time of operation, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative hospitalization duration and postoperative wound pain duration, the minimally invasive and unilateral fixed group was superior to the open and bilateral fixed group( all P 〈0. 01 ). One year after operation,the Japanese orthopeadic association(JOA) scores was higher and visual analog scale(VAS) scores was lower in the minimally invasion and unilateral fixed group than the open and bilateral fixed group( all P 〈 0. 01 ). While in the height of intervertebral space and the intervertebral fusion rate there was no statis- tically significant difference between the two groups (P 〉 0. 05 ). Conclusion The surgery of lumbar unilateral fixed intervertebral fusion via Mast Quadrant minimally invasive system and the surgery of lumbar bilateral fixed interverte- bral fusion have same clinical effects in recovery of intervertebral space height,increasing of intervertebral fusion rate and reconstruction of lumbar spinal stability. However, the minimally invasive and unilateral fixed intervertebral fusion has advantages of less operative wound, shorter operative and hospitalizing time, more rapid recovery and fewer com- plications.
出处 《中国临床新医学》 2013年第10期936-939,共4页 CHINESE JOURNAL OF NEW CLINICAL MEDICINE
基金 广西卫生厅重点科研课题(编号:桂卫重2011106)
关键词 微创 腰椎 单侧固定 椎间融合 Minimally invasion Lumbar vertebrae Unilateral fixation Intervertebral fusion
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献28

  • 1唐天驷,钱忠来.腰椎崩裂和滑脱症[J].中华骨科杂志,1997,17(1):5-7. 被引量:138
  • 2Foley KY,HoIly LT,Schwender JD. Minimally invasive lumbar fusion[J].Spine,2003,28(15 Suppl) :S26-S35.
  • 3Kim KT,Lee SH,Suk KS, et al. The quantitative of tissue injury markers after mini-open lumbar fusion[J].Spine,2006, 31 (6) :712-716.
  • 4Suk KS,Lee HM,Kim NH, et al. Unilateral versus bilateral pedicle screw fixation in lumbar spinal fusion[J]. Spine,2000, 25(14) : 1843-1847.
  • 5Ogilvie JW.Complications in spondylolisthesis surgery[J].Spine, 2005,30(6 Suppl) :S97-101.
  • 6Bridwell KH. Utilization of iliac screws and structural interbody grafting for revisi-on spondylolisthesis surgery[J].Spine, 2005.30(6 SUDD1) :S88-S96.
  • 7Salehi SA,Tawk R,Ganju A,et al.transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion:surgical technique and results in 24patients[J]. Neurosurgerv, 2004,54 (2) : 368-374.
  • 8Schizas C,Nicolas T,Elefterios T,et al.Minimally invasive versus open transforam-inal lumbar interbody fusion:evaluating initial experience[J].International Ortho-paedics(SICOT),2009, 33(11 ) : 1683-1688.
  • 9Chin Z,Zhao J,Liu A.Surgical treatment of recurrent lumbar disc heniation by transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion[J]. International Orthopaedics, 2008,21 (3) : 12.
  • 10Musacchio M,Patel N,Bagan B,et al.Mnimally invasive lumbar laminectomy via a dualtube technique:evaluation in a cadaver model[J].Surgeuro1,2007,67(4) :348-352.

共引文献57

同被引文献70

  • 1邱贵兴.骨科学高级教程[M].北京:人民军医出版社,2010:184-189.
  • 2Tajima N, Chosa E, Watanabe S. Posterolateral lumbar fusion [ J ]. J Orthop Sci ,2004,9 ( 3 ) :327 - 333.
  • 3Majani G,Tiengo M, Giardini A, et al. Relationship between MPQ and VAS in 962 patients:a rationale for their use [ J ]. Minerva Anestesiol, 2003,69:67 - 73.
  • 4Fairbank JC, Pynsent PB. The Oswestry disability index [ J ]. Spine, 2000,25:2940 - 2952.
  • 5Macnab I. Negative disc exploration. An analysis of the causes of Nerve-root involvement in sixty-eight patients [ J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 1971,53(5) : 891 -903.
  • 6Suk S, Lee CK, Kim WJ, et al. Adding posterior lumbar interbody fu- sion to pediele screw fixation and posterolater',d fusion after decom- pression in spondylolytic spondylolisthesis [ J ]. Spine ( Phila Pa 1976) ,1997,22(2) :210 -219.
  • 7Macnab IAN, Cuthbert H, Godfrey CM. The incidence of denervation of the saerospinales muscles following spinal surgery [ J ]. Spine, 1977, 2(4): 294-298.
  • 8Kawaguehi Y, MatsuiH, T suji H, et al. Back muscle injury after pos- terior lurabra spine surgery-A_ histologic and enzymatic anlaysis [ J ]. Spine(Phila Pa 1976) ,2010,21 (8) :941 -944.
  • 9Karikari IO, Isaacs RE. Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion : a review of techniques and outcomes [ J ]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2010, 35(26 Suppl) : S294 -S301.
  • 10Kawaguehi Y, Yabuki S, Styf J, et al. Back muscle injury after poste- rior lumbar spine surgery. Topographic evaluation of in-tramusculaa" pressure and blood flow in the porcine back muscle duirng surgery [J]. Spine(Phila Pa 1976) ,2010,21 (22):2683 -2688.

引证文献4

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部