摘要
目的探讨时间分辨荧光法(TRFIA)、化学发光免疫分析法(CLIA)和酶联免疫吸附法(ELISA)检测胃蛋白酶原Ⅱ(PGⅡ)的相关性,及其临床实用性。方法在TRFIA法检测的临床标本中随机选择88份血清标本,分别用CLIA法和ELISA法再次检测PGⅡ,分析3种方法检测结果的相关性;对消化科门诊/病房患者和体检人群进行回顾性分析,验证TRFIA法检测PGⅡ对胃病筛查的可行性。结果 TRFIA法(Y)与CLIA法(X)PGⅡ检测结果呈显著正相关(r=0.946 7,P=0.000 1),回归方程为:Y=0.952 8 X+0.571 1(P=0.000 1);TRFIA法(Y)与ELISA法(X)PGⅡ检测结果呈显著正相关(r=0.961 8,P=0.000 1),回归方程为:Y=0.727 5 X+0.2617(P=0.0001);ELISA法(Y)与CLIA法(X)PGⅡ检测结果呈显著正相关(r=0.980 6,P=0.000 1),回归方程为:Y=1.304 9 X+0.480 0(P=0.000 1);体检人群、消化科门诊患者、消化科住院患者的血清PGⅡ水平分别为(15.97±10.82)ng/mL、(20.75±17.27)ng/mL、(35.64±41.14)ng/mL,消化科门诊患者血清PGⅡ水平明显高于体检人群(P<0.05),消化科住院患者血清PGⅡ水平明显高于消化科门诊患者(P<0.05)。结论 PGⅡ可能用于浅表性胃炎、胃十二指肠糜烂或溃疡的筛查,但鉴于不同方法检测结果的差异,建议各实验室根据不同方法建立自己的参考值。
Objective To evaluate the correlation of three pepsinogenⅡ(PGⅡ)detection methods and its clinical applications.Methods 88serum samples were randomly selected,and PGⅡwas detected by using time-resolved fluoroimmunoassay(TRFIA),chemiluminescence immunoassay(CLIA)and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay(ELISA),respectively.Then,their results were processed using regression and correlation analysis.To verify the feasibility of gastric disease screening by PGⅡdetection,5 439 people were divided into three groups:gastroenterology outpatients,gastroenterology hospitalized patients,and physical examination population.Results It showed a significant positive correlation between any two of the three methods(P&lt;0.05).PGⅡserum levels were(15.97±10.82)ng/mL,(20.75±17.27)ng/mL,and(35.64±41.14)ng/mL in physical examination population,outpatients,and hospitalized patients,respectively.There was significantly difference between the three groups(P&lt;0.05).Conclusion PGⅡdetection may be used for the screening of superficial gastritis and gastroduodenal ulcer.But the laboratory should establish its own reference values according to different methods.
出处
《国际检验医学杂志》
CAS
2013年第19期2519-2520,共2页
International Journal of Laboratory Medicine
基金
上海市科委课题(10411950800)