期刊文献+

超声评价甲状腺结节恶性度分级的初步探讨 被引量:32

Exploration on an ultrasonographic imaging reporting and data system in malignancy grading of thyroid nodules
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 探讨超声鉴别诊断甲状腺结节良、恶性的价值,尝试建立量化分级系统.方法 回顾性分析527例甲状腺结节患者926个甲状腺结节的超声征象,并对20项指标进行评估.应用多因素Logistic回归模型,拟合出计算甲状腺结节为恶性的概率方程,根据模型进行概率预测,初步建立分级系统.结果 超声诊断良恶性甲状腺结节的准确率为80.1%.Logistic多因素回归结果显示,纵横比≥1、边界不清、边缘不规则、内部显著低回声、内部低回声、内部微钙化、后方回声衰减、甲状腺包膜受侵、周旁淋巴结异常和弹性成像5分法评分>3分与诊断甲状腺癌结节有关.根据Logistic回归模型分析结果,建立模型为Z=Logit(P)=-3.367+1.122X1+1.170X2+1.401X3+1.170X4+1.195X5 +0.758X6+ 1.056X7+2.082X8+1.751X9+0.918X10,根据Logistic回归模型计算公式Pus=1/[1+e-z],将Z代入,以Pus>0.50为界值,该模型预测的准确率为84.1%,其中,预测结节性甲状腺肿的准确率为92.2%,预测甲状腺癌的准确率为69.4%.根据建立的模型预测甲状腺癌,其受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线下面积为0.889(95%CI为0.865 ~0.913).Pus建立的超声诊断甲状腺结节的4级分级系统中,1级的恶性率为0 ~16%,2级的恶性率为17% ~ 50%,3级的恶性率为51% ~70%,4级的恶性率为71% ~ 100%.结论 量化分级系统可使超声报告更加客观化、规范化和标准化,可用于临床评估甲状腺结节的恶性风险度. Objective To explore the values of ultrasonographic features in differentially diagnosing benign and malignant thyroid nodules, and attempt to establish a quantitative ultrasound classification system. Methods We retrospectively analyzed 20 ultrasound features of 926 thyroid nodules in 527 patients. Using logistic regression analysis, we obtained the probability function for predicting the malignancy in thyroid nodules and established a preliminary ultrasound classification system. Results The ages of patients with thyroid nodules was older than that of the patients with thyroid carcinoma ( t = 6. 496, P 〈0.001 ). The correctness rate of ultrasonic diagnosis was 80. 1%. The logistic multivariate regression analysis showed that among all ultrasonographie features, aspect ratio ≥ 1, obscure boundary, irregular margin, significant internal hypoecho, internal hypoeeho, internal micro-calcifications, posterior echo attenuation, thyroid capsule invasion, abnormal adjacent lymph nodes, and ultrasonic elastography 5-point evaluation scores 〉 3 were contributing factors for thyroid carcinoma. The equation was pus = 1 / [ 1 + e - z ] , where z is the logit of malignant thyroid nodule, and taking pus 〉 0.50 as boundary value, the prediction accuracy rate was 84. 1%. Using this model, 92.2% of the thyroid nodules were predicted as nodular goiter, and 69.4% of the thyroid carcinomas were correctly predicted, pu~ was stratified into four levels: Level 1 : 0-16% malignancy; Level 2 : 17% -50% malignancy; Level 3 : 51% -70% malignancy; and level 4: 71%-100% malignancy. Conclusions The quantitative thyroid imaging reporting and data system developed in this study makes ultrasound reports more objective, normalized and standardized. It can be used to evaluate the malignancy risk of thyroid nodules and help to make right decision in clinics.
出处 《中华肿瘤杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2013年第10期758-763,共6页 Chinese Journal of Oncology
基金 浙江省医药科技计划(2012KYB033) 浙江省公益技术研究社会发展项目(2013C33206)
关键词 甲状腺结节 超声检查 影像报告和数据系统 诊断 预测 恶性 Thyroid nodule Ultrasonography Imaging reporting and data system Diagnosis Forecasting Malignancy
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1Cooper DS,Doherty GM,Haugen BR,et al.Revised American Thyroid Association management guidelines for patients with thyroid nodules and differentiated thyroid cancer.Thyroid,2009,19:1167-1214.
  • 2燕山,詹维伟,周建桥,等.甲状腺与甲状旁腺超声影像学.北京:中国技术文献出版社,2009:57-70.
  • 3Kang TW,Shin JH,Han BK,et al.Preoperative ultrasound-guided tattooing localization of recurrences after thyroidectomy:safety and effectiveness.Ann Surg Oncol,2009,16:1655-1659.
  • 4Iannuccilli JD,Cronan JJ,Monchik JM.Risk for malignancy of thyroid nodules as assessed by sonographic criteria:the need for biopsy.J Ultrasound Med,2004,23:1455-1464.
  • 5Arora N,Scognamiglio T,Zhu B,et al.Do benign thyroid nodules have malignant potential?.An evidence-based review.World J Surg,2008,32:1237-1246.
  • 6邹霞,李泉水,张家庭,粟辉,陈胜华,郭国强,姜健.超声显像鉴别甲状腺癌结节的价值[J].中国医学影像技术,2009,25(10):1777-1780. 被引量:29
  • 7马步云,Parajuly Shyam Sundar,彭玉兰,时莹瑜.甲状腺影像报告和数据系统在超声检查甲状腺结节中的应用[J].中国普外基础与临床杂志,2011,18(8):898-901. 被引量:50
  • 8Horvath E,Majlis S,Rossi R,et al.An ultrasonogram reporting system for thyroid nodules stratifying cancer risk for clinical management.J Clin Endocrinol Metab,2009,94:1748-1751.
  • 9Kwak JY,Han KH,Yoon JH,et al.Thyroid imaging reporting and data system for US features of nodules:a step in establishing better stratification of cancer risk.Radiology,2011,260:892-899.
  • 10Park JY,Lee HJ,Jang HW,et al.A proposal for a thyroid imaging reporting and data system for ultrasound features of thyroid carcinoma.Thyroid,2009,19:1257-1264.

二级参考文献60

  • 1吕珂,姜玉新,张缙熙,程玉芳,孙影.甲状腺结节的超声诊断研究[J].中华超声影像学杂志,2003,12(5):28-31. 被引量:240
  • 2彭玉兰,罗燕,张卫东,冯超,赵丽华,陈运.老年人甲状腺结节及甲状腺功能的相关性探讨[J].中华老年医学杂志,2005,24(4):290-291. 被引量:22
  • 3李泉水,张家庭,田平,李征毅,粟晖,高露露,杨秋红,李振洲.甲状腺癌的声像图特征研究[J].中国医学影像技术,2006,22(4):554-556. 被引量:48
  • 4罗葆明,欧冰,智慧,冯霞,文艳玲.乳腺肿块超声弹性成像误诊原因分析及对策[J].中国超声医学杂志,2007,23(4):259-261. 被引量:61
  • 5Cappelli C, Castellano M, Pirola I, et al. Thyroid nodule shape suggests malignan.cy. Eur J Endocrinol, 2006,155(1) :27-31.
  • 6Das DK, Mallik MK, Haji BE. Psammoma body anditsprecursor in papillary thyroid carcinoma: a study by fine-needle aspiration cytology. Diagn Cytopathol, 2004,31(6) : 380-386.
  • 7Jun P, Chow LC, Jeffrey RB. The sonographic features of papillary thyroid carcinomas: pictorial essay. Utrasound Q, 2005, 21 (1):39-45.
  • 8Wong KT, Ahuja AT. Ultrasound of thyroid cancer. Cancer Imaging, 2005,5 : 157-166.
  • 9Gorges R, Eising EG, Fotescu D, et al. Diagnostic value of highresolution B mode and power mode sonography in the follow-up of thyroid cancer. EurJ Ultrasound, 2003,16(3):191-206.
  • 10Mary C.Frates,Carol B.Benson,Peter M.Doubilet,et al.Prevalence and Distribution of Carcinoma in Patients with Solitary and Multiple Thyroid Nodules on Somography.J Clin Endocrinol Metab,2006,91(9):3411-3417.

共引文献161

同被引文献289

引证文献32

二级引证文献222

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部