期刊文献+

单药培美曲塞二线治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌的疗效观察 被引量:5

Eicacy of single pemetrexed as a second-line treatment for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer
原文传递
导出
摘要 【摘要】目的:探讨培美曲塞二线治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌的临床疗效。方法:2008年1月--2012年1月56例接受含铂联合化疗方案一线治疗失败的ⅢB期和Ⅳ期非小细胞肺癌患者,接受单药培美曲塞(500mg/m2,d1)二线治疗,21d为1个周期。化疗2个周期后评价近期疗效和不良反应。远期指标包括中位生存期和1年生存率。结果:本组56例患者完成2~6个周期培美曲塞治疗,共178个周期,均可评价疗效。其中,完全缓解0例,部分缓解9例(16.1%),疾病稳定19例(33.9%),疾病进展28例(50.0%),客观有效率为16.1%;中位生存期为8.9个月,1年生存率为30.35%。主要不良反应为骨髓抑制和胃肠反应,严重程度较轻,均可耐受,无治疗相关死亡。结论:培美曲塞二线治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌疗效确切,且不良反应可以耐受。 Objective: To investigate the efficacy of pemetrexed as a second-line treatment for patients with NSCLC (advanced non-small cell lung cancer). Methods: Fifty-six patients with stages IIIB - IV NSCLC, who failed in the first-line cisplatin-based chemotherapy, were enrolled in this study between January 2008 and January 2012. All the patiients received pemetrexed 500 mg/m2 on day 1 and repeated every 21 days as a second-line chemotherapy. After two cycles of chemotherapy, the clinical efficacy and the adverse effects were evaluated. The median survival time and the one-year survival rate were calculated. Results: All the patients received 2-6 cycles of the chemotherapy with a total of 1 78 cycles. All patients were evaluable. Of the 56 patients, no one achieved complete response, 9 (16.1%) achieved partial response, 10 (33.9%) achieved stable disease, 28 (50.0%) achieved progressive disease. The objective response rate was 16.1% (9/56). The median survival time was 8.9 months, and the one-year survival rate was 30.35%. The common adverse effects were bone marrow suppression and gastrointestinal toxicities with a light severity and could be tolerable. No treatment-related deaths occurred. Conclusion: Chemotherapy with pemetrexed as a second-line treatment for advanced NSCLC has a definite efficacy, and the adverse effects can be tolerable.
出处 《肿瘤》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2013年第10期919-921,共3页 Tumor
关键词 非小细胞肺 培美曲塞 治疗结果 Carcinoma, non-small cell lung Pemetrexed Treatment outcome
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1YOICHIRO O. Chemoradiotherapy for lung cancer[J]. Expert Opion Pharmacother, 2005, 6(16):2793-2804.
  • 2周政涛,王金万,鲁明骞,王杰,许新华,文彩虹,彭绪申.固定剂量率输注吉西他滨联合顺铂一线治疗非小细胞肺癌的临床研究[J].肿瘤,2009,29(2):168-171. 被引量:5
  • 3CI-IATTOPADHYAY S, MORAN R G, GOLDMAN I D, Pemetrexed: biochemical and cellular pharmacology, mechanisms, and clinical applications[J]. Mol Cancer Ther, 2007, 6(2):404-417.
  • 4李树婷,马飞,孙燕.抗肿瘤代谢新药——培美曲塞[J].癌症进展,2005,3(5):471-476. 被引量:73
  • 5VOGELZANG N J, RUSTHOVEN J J, SYMANOWSKI J, et al. Phase III study of pemetrexed in combination with cisplatin versus cisplatin alone in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma[J].J Clin Oncol, 2003, 21 (14):2636-2644.
  • 6RUSTHOVEN J, EISENHAUER E, BUTTS C, et al. Multitargeted antifolate LY231514 as first-line chemotherapy for patients with advanced non- small-cell lung cancer: A phase 1I study. National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group[J]. J C/in Onol, 1999, 17:1194-1199.
  • 7CLARKE S J, ABRATT R, GOEDHALS L, et al. Phase II trial of pemetrexed disodium (ALIMTA, LY231 514) in chemotherapy-na'l've patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer[J]. Ann Oncol, 2002, 13(5):737-741.
  • 8CEPPI P, VOLANTE M, SAVIOZZI S, et al. Squamous cell carcinoma of the lung compared with other histotypes shows higher messenger RNA and protein levels for thymidylate synthase[J]. Cancer, 2006, 107(7):1589-1596.

二级参考文献27

  • 1JEMAL A, SIEGEL R, WARD E, et al. Cancer statistics, 2008 [J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2008, 58(2):71-96.
  • 2SCHILLER JH, HARRINGTON D, BELANI CP, et al. Comparison of four chemotherapy regimens for advanced non-small cell lung cancer[ J]. N Engl J Med, 2002, 346(2) :92-98.
  • 3PLUNKETT W, HUANG P, XU Y, et al. Gemcitabine : metabolism, mechanisms of action, and self potentiation [ J ]. Semin Oncol, 1995, 22(4 Suppl 11 ) :3-10.
  • 4GANDHI V, PLUNKETT W, DU M, et al. Prolonged infusion of gemcitabine : Clinical and pharmacodynamic studies during a phase Ⅰ trial in relapsed acute myelogenous leukemia [ J ]. J Clin Oncol, 2002, 20 ( 3 ) :665-673.
  • 5GRIMISON P, GALETTIS P, MANNERS S, et al. A randomized crossover study evaluating the effect of gemcitabine infusion dose rate : Evidence of autoinduction of gemcitabine accumulation [ J ]. J Clin Oncol, 2007, 25 (36):5704-5709.
  • 6TEMPERO M, PLUNKETY W, RUIZ VAN HAPEREN V, et al. Randomized phase Ⅱ comparison of dose-intense gemcitabine: Thirty-minute infusion and fixed dose rate infusion in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma[ J]. J Clin Oncol, 2003, 21 ( 18 ) : 3402 -3408.
  • 7SO0 R A, WANG L Z, THAM L S, et al. A multicentre randomized phase Ⅱ study of carboplatin in combination with gemcitabine at standard rate or fixed dose rate infusion in patients with advanced stage non-small cell lung cancer[ J]. Ann Oncol, 2006, 17(7) :1128-1133.
  • 8CERIBELLI A, GRIDELLI C, DE MARINIS F, et al. Prolonged gemcitabine infusion in advanced non-small cell lung carcinoma : A randomized phase Ⅱ study of two different schedules in combination with cisplatin[ J ]. Cancer, 2003, 98 (2) :337-343.
  • 9PEREIRA JR, FEIN L, DEL GIGLIO A, et al. Gemcitabine administered as a short infusion versus a fixed dose rate in combination with cisplatin for the treatment of patients with advanced nonsmall-cell lung cancer [ J ]. Lung Cancer, 2007, 58 ( 1 ) :80-87.
  • 10COMELLA P, PUTZU C, MASSIDDA B, et al. Intra-patient alternated dose escalation of paclitaxel and gemcitabine versus paclitaxel followed by fixed dose rate infusion of gemcitabine in fit elderly non-small cell lung cancer patients: A Southern Italy Cooperative Oncology Group randomized phase Ⅱ trial [ J ]. Lung Cancer, 2007, 56(2):263-271.

共引文献76

同被引文献49

引证文献5

二级引证文献12

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部