期刊文献+

制度质量与收入不均:基于中国省级层面数据的实证研究 被引量:1

Institutional Quality and Income Inequality:Empirical Research Based on Chinese Provincialevel Data
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文通过建立跨省动态面板模型,运用系统GMM估计方法考察各省制度质量对我国收入分配和收入不均的影响,发现我国制度质量与收入不均之间存在倒U型的关系,当制度质量较低的时候,制度质量的提升会加大贫富差距,但当制度质量提升到一定程度,跨过一定的门槛值之后,会缩小贫富差距。我国制度质量尚处于较低阶段,因此近年来我国制度质量的提升,加剧了财富由低收入人群向高收入人群的转移,扩大了贫富差距。 By inter-provincial dynamic panel model and the system GMM estimation,the study examines the impact on income distribution and income inequality of different institutional quality in different provinces in China,and finds that the inverted U-shaped relationship exists between institutional quality and income in- equality. When the institutional quality is poor,the improvement of institutional quality may worsen income inequality;when this improvement reaches a certain threshold,however,the improvement of institutional quality would narrow the wealth gap. As the institutional quality of China now still remains at a relatively low lev- el,enhancing institutional quality in recent years has exacerbated the wealth transfered from the low-income to the upper income level.
作者 郭苏文 张莉
出处 《广西财经学院学报》 2013年第5期1-6,共6页 Journal of Guangxi University of Finance and Economics
基金 重庆市教委人文社科研究项目"制度质量视域的重庆经济发展方式包容性转变研究"(13SKC12) 西南政法大学青年项目"基于制度质量视角的中国经济包容性增长问题研究"(2012-XZQN20)
关键词 制度质量 收入不均 收入分配 institutional quality income inequality income distribution
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

  • 1North D C. Institutions, Institutional Change and Econom- ic Performance[ M ]. Cambridge University Press, 1990.
  • 2Champernowne D G, Cowell F A. Economic Inequality and Income Distribution [M]. Cambridge University Press, 1998.
  • 3Chong A, Gradstein M. Inequality and Institutions [J]. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 2007, 89 (3): 454-465.
  • 4Carmignani F. Efficiency of Institutions, Political Stability and Income dynamics [J]. Public Economics, 2005, 503007.
  • 5Amendola A, Easaw J, Savoia A. Inequality in Develop- ing Economies: the Role of Institutional Development[J]. Public Choice, 2013, 155(1-2): 43-60.
  • 6Chaudhuri, S., and Ravallion, M.Partially Awakened Giants: Uncover Growth in China and India [R]. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 4069, November 2006.
  • 7卢峰,姚洋.金融压抑下的法治、金融发展和经济增长[J].中国社会科学,2004(1):42-55. 被引量:793
  • 8Gradstein M, Milanovi6 B, Ying Y. Democracy and In- come Equality: An Empirical Analysis [R].World Bank Research Working Paper, 2001, No. 2561.
  • 9Rogowski R, MacRae D C. Inequality and Institutions: What Theory, History, and (Some) Data Tell Us [J]. Democracy, Inequality, and Representation, 2008: 354- 86.
  • 10Johnston M. Corruption, Inequality, and Change [J]. Corruption, Development and Inequality: Soft Touch or Hard Graft, 1989: 13-37.

二级参考文献24

  • 1.《三角债问题仍然严重》[N].《人民日报》第5版,2002年5月15日.
  • 2高善文.《三角债的成因分析》(手稿)[M].中国人民银行,2000年..
  • 3Daniel Berkowitz, Katharina Pistor, and Jean-Francois Richard, Economic Development, Legality, and the Transplant Effect. European Economic Review, vol. 47, no. 1 (2003), pp. 165-195 .
  • 4Franklin Allen, Jun Qian, and Meijun Qian, Law, Finance, and Economic Growth in China. Working paper,University of Pennsylvania, 2002; La Porta, Ratael, Florencio Lopez-de-Silanes, Andrei Shleifer, and Robert Vishny, Law and Finance. Journal of Political Economy, vol. 106, no. 6 (1998), pp. 1113-1155.
  • 5Minxin Pei, Does Legal Reform Protect Economic Transactions? Commercial Disputes in China. In Peter Murrell(ed.), Assessing the Value of Law in Transition Countries, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2001, pp.180-210.
  • 6William Afford, The More Law, the More…Measuring Legal Reform in the People' s Republic of China. Working Paper no. 59, Stanford Center for International Development, Stanford University, 2000.
  • 7Ross Garnaut, Ligang Song, Yang Yao, and Xiaolu Wang, The Emerging Private Enterprise in China. Canberra:The National University of Australia Press, 2000.
  • 8Ronald McKinnon, Money and Capital in Economic Development. Washington, D. C. : Brookings Institution,1973
  • 9Qian, Yingyi, and Barry Weingast, China' s Transition to Markets: Market-Preserving Federalism, Chinese Style (Journal of Policy Reform, vol. 1, no. 2 (1996), pp. 149-185).
  • 10David Li, Beating the Trap of Financial Repression in China (Cato Journal, vol. 21, no. 1 (2001), pp.77-90).

共引文献875

同被引文献17

  • 1Ali I, Son H H. Measuring Inclusive Growth [ J ]. Asian Development Review, 2007, 24 (1) : 1 - 11.
  • 2ADB. Eminent Persons Group Report [ R]. Asian De- velopment Bank, Anila, 2007.
  • 3AFD (French Development Agency). Pro - Poor Growth in the 1990s: Lessons and Insights from 14 Countries [ R]. Communications Development Incorporated, Washington DC, 2OO5.
  • 4Pasha H A. Inclusive Growth: The Asian Experience [R]. pndpunjab.gov.pk, 2007, 23 (1): 1- 19.
  • 5Sen A. Presidential Address Delivered at the 66th Annu- al Conference of the India [J]. Indian Journal of Agricultural E- conomics, 2007, 62 (1) : 1 - 12.
  • 6Zhuang J, Ali I. Poverty, Inequality, and Inclusive Growth in Asia: Measurement, Policy Issues, and Country Stud- ies [M]. Anthem Press, 2010. 9.
  • 7Suryanarayana M H. Inculusive Growth: What is so Exclusive About It? [R]. Working Paper, No.019, 2012.
  • 8McKinley, T. Inclusive Growth Criteria and Indica- tors: An Inclusive Growth Index for Diagnosis of Country Progress [R]. Working Paper, No. 14, June 2010.
  • 9蔡荣鑫.“包容性增长”理念的形成及其政策内涵[J].经济学家,2009(1):102-104. 被引量:198
  • 10杜志雄,肖卫东,詹琳.包容性增长理论的脉络、要义与政策内涵[J].中国农村经济,2010(11):4-14. 被引量:144

引证文献1

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部