期刊文献+

王士禄与王士禛词之比较 被引量:1

The Comparison of Ci between Wang Shilu and Wang Shizhen
下载PDF
导出
摘要 清初王士禄与王士禛兄弟二人的词,都有《花间》《草堂》的风调,他们在创作上体现出不同倾向:王士禄闺情之作表现静态的浓艳之美,山水之作表达隐逸的思致,王士禛写人有秀逸之美,写景注重历史时空因素的发掘;王士禄抒情较为内敛,含蓄蕴藉,王士禛则趋于外向,注重环境的感发;王士禄在表现上工笔描摹,有较明显的雕琢痕迹,王士禛重于写意,自然流畅。 Wang Shilu and Wang Shizhen were two brothers in the early Qing dynasty. Their Ci were both affected by Huajian and Caotang style. They reflected different tendency in the creation. Wang Shilu's Ci about Boudoir displayed the beauty of gaudy, and Ci about rural landscape expressed his hermit thoughts. Wang Shizhen had comely elegant beauty when describing characters, while he paid attention to space and time when writing about landscape; Wang Shilu's lyrical tended to be introverted and implicative, while Wang Shizhen tended to be extroverted and express environmental feelings; Wang Shilu depict in the meticulous and realistic style and carved obviously, Wang Shizhen attended to freehand brushwork and his Ci appears natural and smooth.
作者 贺琴
出处 《晋中学院学报》 2013年第5期105-108,124,共5页 Journal of Jinzhong University
关键词 王士禄 王士禛 比较 Wang Shilu Wang Shizhen Ci comparison
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1沈雄.古今词话下卷[M]//唐圭璋.词话丛编.北京:中华书局,1986.
  • 2王士禛.居易录卷五[M]/周光培.清代笔记小说.石家庄:河北教育出版社,1996.
  • 3王士禛.炊闻词[M].清康熙问留松阁刻本.
  • 4王士禛.衍波词[M].广州:广东人民出版社,1986.
  • 5王士禛.花草蒙拾[M]//唐圭璋.词话丛编.北京:中华书局,1986:686.
  • 6王士禛.王士祯年谱[M].孙言诚,点校.北京:中华书局,1992.
  • 7李调元.雨村词话卷四[M]//唐圭璋.词话丛编.北京:中华书局,1986.
  • 8永瑢,纪昀.四库全书总目提要[M].海口:海南出版社.1999:390.
  • 9王士禛.十笏草堂辛甲集[M]//四库全书存目丛书补编.济南:齐鲁书社,2001.
  • 10《衍波词》,王士禛著,李少雍编校,广东人民出版社,1986年.

共引文献15

同被引文献6

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部