大学生词块能力和词块学习策略研究被引量：1

A Study on College Students' Lexical Chunk Competence and Learning Strategy

下载PDF

导出

摘要本研究对399名大一学生的词块能力和词块学习策略进行调查分析,结果表明:大一学生的词块掌握情况并不乐观;大一学生整体上词块策略使用频率较低,虽然经常学习词汇,有强烈的词汇学习动机,但是没有很好的词块意识,很少或偶尔使用词块学习策略。高考高分组和低分组学生、学习策略高分组和低分组学生、文科生和理科生、男生和女生以及不同学校的学生之间在词块学习策略上存在着显著性差异。 The study aimed to conduct an investigation on 399 college students＇ lexical chunk competence and learning strategy. It turned out that sophomores＇ competence on lexieal chunks were much lower than expected. Though highly motivated and frequently reci- ting words, most students are unaware of the existence of lexical chunks, not to mention the adoption of ehunk learning strategies. Then, the study found out that there were significant differences between high grade students and low grade students, students majoring in Arts and Science, boys and girls, and students from different schools.

作者李玲玲

机构地区河南理工大学外国语学院

出处《黑龙江教育学院学报》 2013年第10期159-162,共4页 Journal of Heilongjiang College of Education

基金河南省哲学社会科学规划项目"基于语料库的中国英语学习者语块习得与输出能力之相关性研究"(项目批准号:2012BYY021) 河南省教育科学"十二五"规划课题重点课题"基于语料库的大学生英语语块能力调查及词汇教学模式研究"([2012]-JKGHAB-0032*)的阶段性研究成果

关键词词块词块能力词块学习策略 lexical chunks lexieal chunk competence learning strategy

分类号 H313 [语言文字—英语]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献9

1Wong-Fillmore L.The Second Time Around:Cognitive and Social Strategies in Second Language Acquisition[D].Doctoral dissertation,Stanford University,1976.
2Pawley A.& Syder F.H.Two puzzles for linguistic theory:Native-like selection and native-like fluency[C]//In Richards J.& Schmit R.(eds).Language and Communication.London:Longman,1983.
3Wray A.The Focusing Hypothesis:The Theory of Left Hemisphere Lateralized Language Re-examined[M].Amsterdam:John Benjamins,1992.
4Sinclair J.Corpus,Concordance,Collocation[M].Oxford:Oxford University Press,1991.
5Nattinger J.R.& DeCarrico J.S.Lexical Phrases and Language Teaching[M].Oxford:Oxford University Press,1992.
6刘晓玲,阳志清.词汇组块教学——二语教学的一种新趋势[J].外语教学,2003,24(6):51-55. 被引量：193
7Lewis M.The lexical approach:The state of ELT and away forward[M].Hove,England:Language Teaching Publications,1993.
8Cowie A.P.Multi-word lexical units and communicative language teaching[C]//In Arnaud,P.& Bejoint,H.(eds).Vocabulary and Applied Linguistics.London:Macmillan,1992.
9Gu Yongqi &Johnson R.K.Vocabulary learning strategies and language learning Outcomes[J].Language Learning,1996,(46):643-679.

二级参考文献18

1Schmitt, N. Vocabuylary in Language Teaching[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.
2Sperber, D. & Wilson, D. Relevance: Communication and Cognition[M]. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1986.
3Vihman, M. Formulas in First and Second Language Acquisition[A]. Exceptional Language and Linguistics[C]. In L. Obler & L. Menn(eds). New York: Academic Press, 1982.
4Widdowson, H. Knowledge of language and ability for use[J].Applied Linguistics, 1989(10): 2.
5Willis, D. The Lexical Syllabus[M]. London and Glasgow:Collins Co-Build, 1990.
6Yoshida, M. The acquisition of English vocabulary by a Japanese-speaking child [A]. Second Lanugage Acquisition: A Book of Readings[C]. In E. Hatch(ed). Rowley, MA: Newbury, 1978.
7Altenberg. The London-Lund Corpus and Applications in Proceedings of the 7th Annual Conference[R]. UW Center for the New OED. OUP,1991.
8Cook, V. Cognitive processes in Second Language Learning[J].IRAL, 1997(15).
9Cowie. A. P. Multi-word lexical units and communicative language teaching[A]. In Arnaud, P. ＆ Bejoint, H. (eds). Vocabulary and Applied Linguistics[C ]. London: Macmillan, 1992.
10Lakoff, G. &Johnson, M. Metaphors WeLiveby[M]. Chicago:University of Chicago Press, 1983.