期刊文献+

U形可折断椎弓根螺钉微创内固定治疗胸腰椎骨折 被引量:6

Minimal invasive internal fixation with U-shaped break-off pedicle screws for treatent of thoracolumbar fractures
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨应用U形可折断椎弓根螺钉利用椎旁肌间隙通过小切口微创内固定治疗胸腰椎骨折的疗效及其优越性.方法:选择2010年8月至2012年6月,共40例胸腰椎骨折患者,男27例,女13例,年龄22~60岁.T11骨折4例,T12骨折13例,L1骨折17例,L2骨折6例.依据Denis骨折分型,均为爆裂型骨折,椎管占位小于1/3.依据AO分型,均为A型或B1型损伤.均无神经损伤症状和体征.患者随机分为2组,A组(微创组)20例采用U形可折断椎弓根钉小切口微创内固定手术方法于伤椎上下一个节段植入椎弓根钉;B组(开放手术组)20例采用常规后正中入路开放椎弓根钉固定手术,比较两组手术时间、术中出血量、术后引流量、手术前后VAS评分、X线暴露时间、远期随访结果.结果:微创组在手术时间、术中术后出血量、术后早期缓解疼痛等方面较开放手术组有显著优势,在X线暴露时间和远期疗效两组差异无统计学意义.结论:应用U形可折断椎弓根螺钉小切口微创内固定治疗胸腰椎骨折疗效好,具有微创、出血少、术后恢复快等优势,且无需特殊器械,不增加X线暴露. Objective: To investigate the clinical outcome of minimal invasive internal fixation with U-shaped break-off pedicle screws through paraspinal muscle sparing approach to treat thoracolumbar fractures, and to discuss its advantages. Methods: From August 2010 to June 2012, we had 40 thoraco- lumber fractures patients (27 males and 13 females). Their ages ranged from 22 to 60 years. Of the 40 cases, 4 were T11 fractures, 13 T12 fractures, 17 L1 fractures,6 L2 fractures. According to Denis classi- fication, all of them were burst fractures, with vertebral canal compromise less than 1/3. According to AO classification they were type A or type B1 injuries. All the cases had no nerve injury. The patients were randomly divided into two groups. With Group A (20 cases) we took the method of minimal invasive in- ternal fixation with U-shaped break-off pedicle screws to fix one level above and below the injured verte- bra through the parespinal muscle sparing approach. With Group B (20 cases), we took the traditional posterior midline approach and open procedure. Then we compared the two groups by operation time, blood loss, drainage, Visual Analogue Scales and X-ray exposure. Results: Minimal invasive group had obvious advatages in operation time, bleeding control and early pain relief of post-operation. The X-ray exposure and long-term follow-up outcome were almost the same. Conclusion: Through paraspinal mus- cle sparing approach minimal invasive internal fixtation with U-shaped break-off pedicle screws to treat thoracolumber has more advantages than traditional procedure in blood control and quick recovery. The method needs no special instruments and don't increase X-ray exposure.
出处 《北京大学学报(医学版)》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2013年第5期728-731,共4页 Journal of Peking University:Health Sciences
基金 卫生公益性行业科研专项(201002014) 教育部创新团队项目(IRT1201)资助~~
关键词 脊柱骨折 骨折固定术 外科手术 微创性 Spinal fractures Fracture fixation, internal Surgical procedures, minimally
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1Been HD, Bouma GJ. Comparison of two types of surgery for tho- raeolumbar burst fractures : combined anterior and posterior stabili- zation vs. posterior instrumentation only [ J ]. Aeta Neuroehir (Wien), 1999, 141 (4) : 349 - 357.
  • 2Wihse LL, Bateman JG, Hutchinson RH, et al. The paraspinal saerospinalis-splitting approach to the lumbar spine [ J ]. J Bone Joint Surg Am,1968, 50(5) : 919 -926.
  • 3Wihes LL, Spencer CW. New uses and refinements of the parospi- hal approach to the lumbar spine [ J]. Spine, 1988, 13 (6): 696 - 706.
  • 4Anand N, Baron EM, Bray RS. Benefits of the paraspinal muscle sparing approach versus the conventional midline approach for pos- terior nonfusion stabilization: comparative analysis of clinical and functional outcomes[J]. SAS J, 2007, 1 (3) : 63 -67.
  • 5李楠,张贵林,田伟,张波,袁强,行永刚,刘波,李勤.经椎旁肌入路治疗胸腰段椎体骨折[J].中华骨科杂志,2008,28(5):379-382. 被引量:73
  • 6方向前,胡志军,范顺武,赵兴,黄悦,赵凤东,陈剑.胸腰段骨折经肌间隙入路与传统入路内固定的比较研究[J].中华骨科杂志,2009,29(4):315-319. 被引量:136
  • 7Foley ILl. Guptask percutaneous pedicle screw fixation of the lum- ber spine: preliminary clinical results [ J ]. J Neurosurg, 2002, 97 ( Suppl 1 ) : 7 - 12.
  • 8Foley KT. Gupta SK. Percutaneous pediele screw fixation of the lumber spine[J]. Neurosury Focus, 2001, 10(4) : 10.
  • 9Learch TJ, Massie JB, Pathria MN, et al. Assessment of pedicle screw placement utilizing conventional radiography and computed tomography: a proposed systematic approach to improve accuracy of interpretation [ J ]. Spine ( Phila Pa 1976 ), 2004, 29 ( 7 ) : 767 - 773.

二级参考文献19

  • 1Darden BV 2nd, Wade JF, Alexander R, et al. Far lateral disc herniations treated by microscopic fragment excision. Techniques and results. Spine, 1995, 20: 1500-1505.
  • 2Melvill RL, Baxter BL. The intertransverse approach to extraforaminal disc protrusion in the lumbar spine. Spine. 1994. 19: 2707-2714.
  • 3Wiltse LL, Bateman JG, Hutchinson RH. et al. The paraspinal sacrospinalis-splitting approach to the lumbar spine. J Bone Joint Surg(Am), 1968, 50: 919-926.
  • 4Wiltse LL, Spencer CW. New uses and refinements of the paraspinal approach to the lumbar spine. Spine, 1998, 13: 696-706.
  • 5Watkins MB. Posterolateral fusion of the lumbar and lumbosacral spine. J Bone Joint Surg(Am), 1953, 35: 1014-1018.
  • 6Kolil K, Akeetin M, Bilge T. A minimally invasive transmuseular approach to far-lateral L5-S1 level disc herniations: a prospective study. J Spinal Disord Teeh, 2007, 20: 132-138.
  • 7Wiltse LL, Bateman JG, Hutchinson RH, et al. The paraspinal sacrospinalis-splitting approach to the lumbar spine. J Bone Joint Surg(Am), 1968, 50: 919-926.
  • 8Kawaguchi Y, Matsui H, Tsuji H. Changes in serum creatine phosphokinase MM isoenzyme after lumbar spine surgery. Spine, 1997, 22: 1018-1023.
  • 9Thesleff S, Ward MR. Studies on the mechanism of fibrillation potentials in denervated muscle. J Physiol, 1975, 244: 313-323.
  • 10Watkins MB. Posterolateral bonegrafting for fusion of the lumbar and lumbosacral spine. J Bone Joint Surg(Am), 1959, 41: 388-396.

共引文献191

同被引文献68

  • 1袁强,田伟,张贵林,刘波,行勇刚,李勤,胡临,李志宇.骨折椎垂直应力螺钉在胸腰椎骨折中的应用[J].中华骨科杂志,2006,26(4):217-222. 被引量:306
  • 2徐宏兵,孙常太,文良元,薛庆云,路奎元,黄公怡.65岁以上老年人腰椎管狭窄症手术治疗的临床分析[J].中华老年医学杂志,2006,25(7):522-524. 被引量:17
  • 3李勤,田伟,刘波,胡临,李志宇,袁强.导航辅助微创经皮穿刺椎弓根内固定术治疗胸腰椎骨折的疗效观察[J].中华医学杂志,2007,87(19):1339-1341. 被引量:16
  • 4严峻,方旭东,徐玉生,李威.老年退行性腰椎管狭窄症手术治疗的疗效分析[J].脊柱外科杂志,2007,5(5):265-268. 被引量:9
  • 5Kim GW,Jang JW,Hur H,et al.Predictive factors for a kyphosis recurrence following short-segment pedicle screw fixation including fractured vertebral body in unstable thoracolumbar burst fractures[J].J Korean Neurosurg Soc,2014(3):230-236.
  • 6Cakir E,Eyuboglu EE,Yazar U,et al.May"Dubel"be a solution for pullout problem of the pedicle screws at osteoporotic spine[J].Turk Neurosurg,2014(5):726-730.
  • 7Bakhsheshian J,Dahdaleh NS,Patwardhan AG,et al.Comment on the biomechanical analysis of four-versus sixscrew constructs for short-segmentpedicle screw and rod instrumentation of unstable thoracolumbar fractures[J].Spine J,2014(8):1810-1811.
  • 8Foley Kevin T,Gupta Sanjay K.Percutaneous pedicle screw fixation of the lumbar spine: preliminary clinical results. Journal of Neurosurgery . 2002
  • 9Neel Anand,Eli M. Baron,Robert S. Bray.??Benefits of the Paraspinal Muscle-Sparing Approach Versus the Conventional Midline Approach for Posterior Nonfusion Stabilization: Comparative Analysis of Clinical and Functional Outcomes(J)SAS Journal . 2007 (3)
  • 10Foley K T,Gupta S K,Justis J R,Sherman M C.Percutaneous pedicle screw fixation of the lumbar spine. Neurosurgical focus . 2006

引证文献6

二级引证文献21

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部