期刊文献+

3.0T MRI定量动态对比增强对乳腺疾病的应用价值研究 被引量:9

3.0T quantitative dynamic contrast enhanced MRI in diagnosing breast tumor
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的研究3.0T MRI动态对比增强定量参数对乳腺疾病的诊断价值。方法采用3.0T MRI扫描仪和16通道乳腺相控阵线圈对45例怀疑乳腺肿瘤患者进行动态对比增强MRI检查,共发现病灶52个,其中5例为2个病灶(1例为双侧,4例为单侧),1例为3个病灶(双侧),所有2个以上病灶都取最大的病灶纳入研究。分别测量定量血流动力学参数,包括容量转移常数(volume transfer constant,Ktrans)和血管外细胞外间隙容积比(extravascular extracellular space distribute volume per unit tissue volume,Ve)。采用单因素方差分析比较乳腺癌、纤维瘤和其他良性病变的组间差异,受试者特性曲线(receiver operating characteristic curve,ROC)分析良、恶性病变的组间差异。结果乳腺癌(n=23)的Ktrans和Ve均值分别为(10.18±2.65)min-1和7.64±1.20;良性病变(n=22)的Ktrans和Ve均值分别为(5.68±1.15)min-1和8.44±2.01;良性病变中纤维瘤(n=12)的上述均值分别为(7.31±1.42)min-1和11.25±2.75,其他良性病变(n=10)的上述均值分别为(3.73±0.83)min-1和5.07±1.13。乳腺癌与良性病变间Ktrans的差异有统计学意义(F值为4.271,P值<0.05),Ve的差异无统计学意义(F值为1.553,P值>0.05);乳腺癌、乳腺纤维瘤与其他良性病变3组间Ktrans和Ve的差异均有统计学意义(F值分别为4.316和3.944,P值均<0.05)。以最大约登指数为最佳诊断切点值,Ktrans和Ve判断乳腺良恶性病变的敏感度分别为87.5%和81.3%;特异度分别为55.6%和38.9%。综合2个定量参数作为联合指标诊断良、恶性病变的敏感度、特异度和准确度分别为91.3%(21/23),77.3%(17/22)和84.4%(38/45)。结论 3.0T MRI动态对比增强定量血流动力学参数Ktrans对乳腺良恶性病变的鉴别诊断具有很高的诊断价值,Ve对鉴别乳腺癌与纤维瘤具有一定的诊断价值。 Objective To evaluate the value of quantitative parameters of Dynamic Contrast Enhanced MRI (DCE MRI) in the diagnosis of breast tumors. Methods 45 patients suspected of breast tumour underwent DE-DCE MRI examination using 3.0 T whole-body MR scanner with a sixteen-channel phased-array breast coil. Quantitation of the pharmacokinetic parameters was measured including volume transfer constant (Ktrans), extravascular extracellular space distribute volume per unit tissue volume (Ve). The mean Ktrans and Ve of the breast cancer, fibroma and other benign lesions were calculated. One-way ANOVA and receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis were used for comparing the differences between malignant and benign lesions. Results The mean Ktrans and Ve of the lesions were as follows: breast cancer (n =23) ,(10.18±2.65) min^-1 , and 7.64±1.20; benign lesions (n=22), (5.68±1.15) min^-1和 8.44±2.01. The mean Ktrans and Ve of fibroma (n=12) were (7.31±1.42) min^-1 , and 11. 254±2.75; The mean Ktrans and Ve of other benign lesions (n=10) were (3.73 ±0.83) min^-1 , and 5.07±1.13, respectively. There were significant differences between breast cancer and fibroma in Ktrans ( F = 4. 271, P〈0.05). There were no significant differences between breast cancer and fibroma in Ve ( F=1. 553, P〉0.05). There were significant differences among 3 groups of breast cancer, fibromain and other benign lesions in Ktrans and Ve ( F = 4. 316, 3. 944, respectively, P 〈0.05 in all intergroups). The sensitivity of Ktrans and Ve were 87.5%, and 81.3% and the specificity of those were 55.6%, and 38.9%, respectively, for differential diagnosis of breast lesions with the maximum Youden' index as cut off. When combining with 2 quantitative parameters,the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy for differential diagnosis of breast tumors were 91.3% (21/23), 77.3% (17/22) and 84.4%(38/45), respectively. Conclusion The differential diagnosis of breast cancer from benign lesion by K derived from 3.0T DCE MRI is valuable. Ve can improve the diagnostic performance of breast MRI to differentiate breast cancer from fibroma.
出处 《医学影像学杂志》 2013年第10期1558-1561,共4页 Journal of Medical Imaging
基金 浙江省医药卫生一般研究计划项目(编号:2011KYA121)
关键词 乳腺癌 磁共振动态对比增强 Breast cancer Dynamic contrast enhanced Magnetic resonance imaging
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Kvisted KA. Rydland J, Vainio J, et al. Breast lesions, eval uation with dynamic contrast-enhanced Tj-weight MR ima ging and with Tz * -weighted first-pass perfusion MR imaging [J]. Radiology,2000, 216: 545-553.
  • 2欧阳翼,谢传淼,伍尧泮,吕衍春,阮超美,郑列,彭康强,何浩强,陈林,张伟章.动态增强MRI定量参数及最大线性斜率比值对鉴别乳腺良恶性疾病的价值[J].中华放射学杂志,2008,42(6):569-572. 被引量:26
  • 3Yankeeh)v TE, (;()re JC. Dynamic contrasl enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in oncology: theory, data acquisition, a nalysis, and examples[J]. Current Medical Imaging Re views, 2007, 3: 91-107.
  • 4Torts PS, Brix G. Buckley I)L, et al. Estimating kinetic pa rameters from dynamic contrast enhanced Tt-weighted MR1 of a diffusable tracer: standardized quantities and symbols [J]. J Magn Reson Imaging. 1999. 10:223 232.
  • 5汪晓红,耿道颖,顾雅佳,彭卫军,杨天锡.动态增强MRI鉴别乳腺良恶性病变的价值[J].放射学实践,2005,20(8):662-666. 被引量:58
  • 6李建一,翁卿吉,吴忠汉,项凤琳,金赞辉.乳腺肿瘤MRI动态增强模式研究[J].浙江医学,2007,29(1):18-19. 被引量:5
  • 7汤伟军,李克,王红鹰.等.乳腺肿瘤磁共振动态增强模式发肿瘤微血管密度的相关性研究[J].中国医学汁算机成像杂志.2004.10:23-28.
  • 8Kvisted KA. Rydland J, Vainio J, et al. Breast lesions: eval uation with dynamic contrast-enhanced T:-weight MR ima- ging and with Tz : -weighted first pass perfusion MR imaging [J]. Radiology. 2000. 216: 545-553.
  • 9李瑞敏,顾雅佳,毛健,彭卫军,孙非,谭红娜,唐峰,钱敏.定量动态增强MRI鉴别乳腺良恶性病变的研究[J].中华放射学杂志,2011,45(2):164-169. 被引量:83
  • 10Li J, Yu Y, Zhang Y, et al. A clinically feasible method to estimate pharmacokinetic parameters in breast cancer[J]. Medical Physics, 2009, 36.. 3786-3794.

二级参考文献41

  • 1陈蓉,龚水根,张伟国,陈金华,何双梧,刘宝华,李增鹏.乳腺癌MRI形态学表现与病理、分子生物学相关性研究[J].中华放射学杂志,2004,38(6):620-625. 被引量:55
  • 2张嵘,李勇,任俊杰,梁碧玲,文艳玲,李海刚.乳腺叶状瘤的影像诊断[J].中华放射学杂志,2004,38(7):717-720. 被引量:23
  • 3邓丽萍,王林波,章士正,陈文军,章雁.乳腺动态增强核磁共振检查的临床应用价值[J].中华普通外科杂志,2005,20(3):164-166. 被引量:13
  • 4Westerhof JP, Fischer U, Moritz JD, et al. MR imaging of mammographically detected clustered microcalcifications: is there any value? Radiology, 1998,207 : 675-681.
  • 5Nagashima T, Suzuki M, Yagata H, et al. Dynamic-enhanced MRI predicts metastatic potential of invasive ductal breast cancer. Breast Cancer,2002,9 : 226-230.
  • 6Esserman L, Hyhon N, George T, et al. Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging to assess tumor histopathology and angiogenesis in breast carcinoma. Breast J, 1999,5 : 13-21.
  • 7Matsubayashi R, Matsuo Y, Edakuni G, et al. Breast masses with peripheral rim enhancement on dynamic contrast-enhanced MR images: correlation of MR findings with histologic features and expression of growth factors. Radiology,2000,217 : 841-848.
  • 8Sardanelli F, Iozzelli A, Fansto A, et al. Gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced MR imaging breast vascular maps: association between invasive cancer and ipsilateral increased vascularity. Radiology,2005,235 : 791-797.
  • 9Buadu LD, Murakami J, Murayama S, et al. Breast lesions : correlation of contrast medium enhancement patterns on MR images with histopathologic findings and tumor angiogenesis. Radiology, 1996,200 : 639-649.
  • 10Sinha S,Sinha U.Recent advances in breast MRI and MRS.NMB Biomed,2009,22:3-16.

共引文献160

同被引文献82

引证文献9

二级引证文献47

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部