期刊文献+

用于Hangman骨折治疗的椎弓根拉力螺钉的设计与生物力学测试 被引量:9

A new transpedicular lag-screw for treatment of Hangman's fracture
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的研制一种新型的专用于治疗Hangman骨折的椎弓根拉力螺钉。方法选取20具成人干燥颈椎标本,采用游标卡尺测量枢椎的椎弓根高度、椎弓根宽度、侧块中点(进钉点)至椎体前缘的距离、椎体上关节突前后径;6例Hangman骨折患者术前牵引复位后的X线片,采用计算机测量工具测量枢椎侧块中点至椎体前缘的距离、侧块中点至骨折线的距离、骨折线至椎体前缘的距离。参考Herbert螺钉的特点,根据测得的枢椎椎弓根的解剖数据设定新型螺钉各参数,研制一种专用于治疗Hangman骨折的双螺纹加压空心螺钉。用10个PVC高分子塑料制成的枢椎Hangman骨折模型,分别采用新型椎弓根拉力螺钉和普通螺钉对其进行固定,然后进行生物力学抗拉伸测试。结果标本测量:椎弓根高度平均为(7.40±1.04)mm,椎弓根宽度平均为(7.45±1.54)mm,侧块中点至椎体前缘的距离平均为(27.95±1.69)mm,上关节突前后径平均为(17.29±1.51)mm。X线片测量:侧块中点至椎体前缘的距离平均为(29.19±3.54)mm,侧块中点至骨折线的距离平均为(10.71±2.44)mm,骨折线至椎体前缘的距离平均为(15.35±1.66)mm。标本左、右侧椎弓根相关参数的差异无统计学意义。新型螺钉组抗拉伸力平均为(2266.47±158.82)N,普通螺钉组抗拉伸力平均为(1715.51±69.99)N,两组比较差异有统计学意义。结论新型螺钉经椎弓根内固定治疗Hangman骨折的生物力学性能优于普通螺钉。 Objective To design a novel transpedicular lag-screw for the treatment of Hangman's fracture. Methods Twenty adult dried cervical vertebrae specimens were selected and used vernier caliper to measure the indexes of C2, including the height of pedicle, the width of pedicle, the distance of massa lateralis midpoint (entry point) to anterior vertebral, and the anteroposterior diameter of processus articulares superiores. The X-ray films of six Hangman's fracture patients after reduction were selected, and the indexes of C2 were measured on computer, including the distance of entry point to anterior edge, the dis-tance of entry point to fracture line, and the distance of fracture line to anterior edge. According to the anatomic parameters of C2 pedicle and the characteristics of Herbert-screw, a new type of transpedicular lag-screw was designed, which is more suitable for the treatment of Hangman's fracture. This screw is double-threaded, and the biomechanics of which were compared with ordinary ones. Results Specimen measurements showed the height of pedicle (7.40±1.04) mm, the width of pedicle (7.45±1.54) mm, the distance of massa lateralis midpoint to anterior vertebrae (27.95±1.69) mm, and the anteroposterior diameter of processus articu-lates superiors (17.29±1.51) mm. X-ray measurements showed the distance of entry point to anterior edge (29.19±3.54) mm, the distance of entry point to fracture line (10.71±2.44) ram, and the distance of fracture line to anterior edge (15.35±1.66) ram. There were no significant differences between the two sides of the pedicle measurements. The new-screw group and the ordinary-screw group tensile strength was (2266.47±158.82) N and (1715.51±69.99) N, respectively. There were statistically significant differences between the two groups. Conclusion The effect of novel transpedicular lag-screws for the treatment of Hangman's fracture is better than that of the ordinary ones.
出处 《中华骨科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2013年第11期1141-1146,共6页 Chinese Journal of Orthopaedics
关键词 枢椎 脊柱骨折 内固定器 生物力学 Axis Spinal Fractures Internal Fixators Biomechanics
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1Hadley MN, Browner C, Sonntag VK. Axis fractures: a compre- hensive review of management and treatment in 107 cases. Neu- rosurgery, 1985, 17(2): 281-290.
  • 2Taller S, Suchomel P, Luk6s R, et al. CT-guided internal fixation of a hangman's fracture. Eur Spine J, 2000, 9(5): 393-397.
  • 3史峰军,刘长胜,冯刚,于泉,王大勇,张勇,张克非,崔明宇.应用椎弓根螺钉内固定治疗Hangman骨折[J].中华骨科杂志,2002,22(11):699-700. 被引量:16
  • 4谭军,贾连顺,侯黎升,周栋,周许辉,蔡晓斌,徐建伟,左金良,袁文.C_2椎弓根拉力螺钉选择性治疗Hangman骨折[J].中华骨科杂志,2002,22(11):653-656. 被引量:84
  • 5翁益民,徐华梓,水小龙,林焱,王向阳,孔建中,池永龙.经皮C2椎弓根拉力螺钉微创治疗Hangman骨折[J].中华创伤杂志,2008,24(8):612-614. 被引量:3
  • 6Levine AM, Edwards CC. The management of traumatic spondy- lolisthesis of the axis. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 1985, 67(2): 217-226.
  • 7Borne GM, Bedou GL, Pinaudeau M. Treatment of pedicular fractures of the axis. A clinical study and screw fixation tech- nique. J Neurosurg, 1984, 60(1): 88-93.
  • 8Abumi K, Kaneda K. Pedicle screw fixation for nontraumatic le- sions of the cervical spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 1997, 22(16): 1853-1863.
  • 9Ebraheim N, Rollins JR Jr, Xu R, et al. Anatomic consideration of C2 pedicle screw placement. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 1996, 21 (6): 691-695.

二级参考文献31

  • 1王振汉,刘淼.枢椎椎弓骨折延迟诊断与误诊原因分析[J].临床误诊误治,1993,6(3):97-98. 被引量:3
  • 2王振汉,刘淼.枢椎椎弓骨折的诊治[J].中华创伤杂志,1993,9(3):143-144. 被引量:1
  • 3林研,印心奇.枢椎椎弓峡部骨折的诊治体会[J].中国矫形外科杂志,1996,3(2):119-120. 被引量:1
  • 4Effendi B, Roy D, Cornish B, et al. Fracture of the ring of the axis. A classification based on the analyse of 131 cases. J Bone Joint Surg (Br), 1981, 63(3) :319 -327.
  • 5Verheggen R, Jansen J. Hangman' s fracture : argument in favor of surgical therapy for type Ⅱ and Ⅲ according to Edwards and Levine. Surg Neurol, 1998, 49 (3) : 253 - 261.
  • 6Levine AM, Edwards CC. The management of traumatic spondylolisthesis of the axis. J Bone Joint Surg (Am), 1985, 67 (2) :217 - 226.
  • 7Madawi AA, Casey ATH, Solanki GA, et al. Radiological and anatomical evaluation of the atlantoaxial transarticular screw fixation technique. J Neurosurg, 1997, 86(6) :961 -966.
  • 8Albumi k, Shono Y, ho M, et al. Complications of pedicle screw fixation in reconstructive surgery of the cervical spine. Spine, 2000, 25 (8) :962 - 969.
  • 9Muller EJ, Wick M, Muhr G. Traumatic spondylolisthesis of the axis: treatment rational based on the stability of the different fracture types. Eur Spine J, 2000, 9(2) :123 -128.
  • 10Starr JK, Eismont FJ. Atypical hangman' s fractures. Spine, 1993,18(14) :1954 -1957.

共引文献88

同被引文献53

  • 1董凡,戴克戎.小关节完整性与腰椎稳定性的相关研究[J].中华骨科杂志,1993,13(5):366-369. 被引量:29
  • 2李浩淼,刘少喻,梁春祥,陈柏龄,于滨生.前路内固定治疗Ⅱ型及Ⅱa型Hangman骨折的疗效[J].中国脊柱脊髓杂志,2007,17(2):107-110. 被引量:16
  • 3康辉,贾连顺,谭军,张亮,周许辉.椎弓根螺钉固定或联合侧块螺钉固定治疗Hangman骨折[J].中国脊柱脊髓杂志,2007,17(10):757-760. 被引量:7
  • 4Campos WK, Dos Santos Sousa D. Anterior screw fixation for od- ontoid fracture using the direct approach at the C2-C3 level: case report and literature review[J]. J Spine, 2014, 3(2) :1-4.
  • 5Park JH, Kim SH, Cho KH. Clinical outcomes of posterior C2-C3 fixation for unstable Hangman' s fracture compared with posterior C1-C3 fusion[ J]. Korean J Spine, 2014, 11 (2) :33-38.
  • 6Platzer P, Thalhammer G, Krumboeck A, et al. Plate fixation of odontoid fractures without C1-C2 arthrodesis: practice of a novel surgical technique for stabilization of odontoid fractures, including the opportunity to extend the fixation to C3 [ J ]. Neurosurgery, 2009, 64(4) :726-733.
  • 7Platzer P, Eipeldauer S, Leitgeb J, et al. Biomechanical compari- son of odontoid plate fixation versus odontoid screw fixation[ J]. J Spinal Disord Tech, 2011,24(3) :164-169.
  • 8Nourbakhsh A, Patil S, Vannemreddy P, et al. The use of bioab- sorbable screws to fix Type I1 odontoid fractures: a biomechanical study[J]. J Neurosurg Spine. 2011, 15(4) :361-366.
  • 9Daniels AH, Magee W, Badra M, et al. Preliminary biomechani- cal proof of concept for a hybrid locking plate/variable pitch screw construct for anterior fixation of type Ⅱ odontoid fractures [ J 1. Spine, 2012, 37(19) :E1159-E1164.
  • 10Anderson LD, D' Alonzo RT. Fractures of the odontoid process of the axis[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 1974, 56(8) :1663-1674.

引证文献9

二级引证文献28

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部