案外人救济机制竞合问题研究——以我国新《民事诉讼法》施行为背景

On Relief Mechanism Concurrence of Third Party——Taking Implication of Our “Criminal Procedure Law” as Background

此次民事诉讼法修改引入了第三人撤销之诉制度,立法者试图使用该制度解决两方面的问题,一方面是控制恶意诉讼、虚假诉讼,另一方面是赋予案外人更多的事后救济途径。然而,上述制度的引进却在实践中与已经存在的案外人救济机制产生了竞合问题。我国民事诉讼案外人大致可以划分为三个类型,在实践中,立法对这三种案外人的保护已经处于一种厚此薄彼的态势。这种态势在引入第三人撤销之诉制度后,不但没有缓解,却更增加了混乱与冲突的可能。基于上述考量,我国立法机关应主要从消除竞合的角度,对案外人救济机制进行改造。

This criminal law modification introduces the system of the third party＇s lawsuit revocation. The lawmakers want to use this system to solve two problems ： one is to control malicious or false lawsuit, and the other is to provide the third party with more relief ways after the event. However, in practice it produces concurrence problem with the original third party relief mech- anism. In our criminal procedure law, the third party can be divided into three kinds. In practice, the lawful defense for the third party seems discriminatory. After the introduction the system of the third party＇s lawsuit revocation, this condition is not improved, but some confusion and conflict may appear. Therefore, our legislatures should carry out reform to the third party re- lief mechanism so as to eliminate concurrence.