期刊文献+

基于创新投入的企业竞争战略对绩效的影响 被引量:11

The Effect of Firm Competitive Strategy on Performance Based on Innovation Input
原文传递
导出
摘要 基于2006--2011年的制造业上市公司研究企业的创新投入在竞争战略对企业影响中的作用,研究结果显示:差异化战略与低成本战略对企业绩效都有正向影响,其中差异化战略对企业绩效的总效应略微大于低成本战略;差异化战略对企业的创新投入有正向影响,且创新投入对企业绩效有正向影响,创新投入在差异化战略对企业绩效的影响中起到一定的中介效应,其效应大小约为差异化战略对企业绩效总效应的8.5%. Based on the manufacturing listed companies from 2006 to 2011, this paper studies the role of innovation input in the influence competitive strategy has on enterprises. The results show that: (1) that differentiation strategy and low cost strategy have a positive effect on firm performance, while the overall effect of differentiation strategy on firm performance is slightly greater than that of low cost strategy~ (2) differentiation strategy have a positive effect on firm's innovation input, which positively influences firm performance and can mediate the impact of differentiation strategy on firm performance, and its effect is about 8.5 ~ of the overall effect of differentiation strategy on firm performance.
作者 雷辉 杨丹
出处 《系统工程》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2013年第9期114-120,共7页 Systems Engineering
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(71272208) 教育部新世纪优秀人才支持计划项目(NCET-11-0125) 国家自然科学基金重点资助项目(71031004) 湖南省社会科学重点项目(11ZDB054) 湖南省自然科学基金资助项目(12JJ6070)
关键词 竞争战略 创新投入 企业绩效 中介效应 Competitive Strategy~ Innovation Input~ Firm Performance~ Mediating Effect
  • 相关文献

参考文献20

  • 1Porter M E. Competitive strategy. Techniques for analyzing industries and competitors [M ]. New York, The Free Press, 1980.
  • 2Dess G G, Davis P S. Porter (1980) generic strategies as determinants of strategic group membership and organizational performance [J]. Academy of Management Review, 1984,27 (3) : 467 -488.
  • 3Miller D, P H Friesen. Porter's (1980) generic strategies and performance- An empirical examina- tion with America data (Part I: Testing Porter)[J]. Organization Studies, 1986,7 (1), 37"- 55.
  • 4Miller D, P H Friesen. Porter- s (1980) generic strategies and performance. An empirical examina- tion with America Data (Part II: Performance Implications )[J]. Organization Studies, 1986,7 (3) : 255-261.
  • 5Campbell-Hunt, Colin. What have we learned about generic competitive strategy? Ameta-analysis [J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2000, 21 (2): 127 154.
  • 6Amoko-Gyampah K, Aequaah M. Manufacturing strategy, competitive strategy and firm performance: An empirical study in a developing economy environment[J]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2007, doi: 10, 1016/j, ijpe. 2007.02. 030.
  • 7王铁男.竞争优势:低成本领先战略的理性思考——沃尔·马特与邯钢保持竞争优势的比较分析[J].管理世界,2000,16(2):189-196. 被引量:24
  • 8刘睿智,胥朝阳.竞争战略、企业绩效与持续竞争优势——来自中国上市公司的经验证据[J].科研管理,2008,29(6):36-43. 被引量:73
  • 9蔺雷,吴贵生.我国制造企业服务增强差异化机制的实证研究[J].管理世界,2007,23(6):103-113. 被引量:107
  • 10Zajac E J, Shortell S M. Changing generic strategies: Likelihood, direction, and performance implications [J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1989, (10) : 413-430.

二级参考文献100

共引文献355

同被引文献106

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部