期刊文献+

基于通用知识的软件设计安全性评估 被引量:1

Knowledge-Based Security Evaluation in Software Design
下载PDF
导出
摘要 安全性作为软件系统的重要属性,越来越受到人们的重视.在软件开发的早期对安全性进行评估,对软件的质量控制和成本控制有着重要意义.当前的软件安全性评估主要依靠专家评审,结果的客观性及准确性常常受到专家主观意见的影响.通过使用通用知识作为评估依据,提出一种可以对UML顺序图形式的软件设计文档进行自动化分析的方法,可以发现软件设计中潜在的安全性漏洞.该方法可以减少结果中的主观性,同时,通过基于该方法的辅助工具的使用,可以大大提高评估效率. As an important property of the software system, software security has drawn more and more attention. Security evaluation in the early phase of the software development is important to software quality and cost control. Current expert-based review and inspection methods can be error-prone and subjective. In this paper, we have proposed a knowledge-based security evaluation approach which can detect vulnerabilities in the UML sequence diagrams. With common knowledge as the evaluation reference, we can reduce the subjectivity in the result. We also have developed a support tool which can automatically perform most of the work in the method and improve the efficiency.
出处 《计算机系统应用》 2013年第11期1-6,80,共7页 Computer Systems & Applications
基金 国家自然科学基金(61073044 71101138 61003028) 国家重大科技专项(2012ZX01039-004) 北京市自然科学基金(4122087)
关键词 软件安全性 通用知识 攻击模式 软件安全性评估 UML顺序图 software security common knowledge attack pattern software security evaluation UML sequencediagram
  • 相关文献

参考文献22

二级参考文献78

  • 1赵冬梅,马建峰,王跃生.信息系统的模糊风险评估模型[J].通信学报,2007,28(4):51-56. 被引量:63
  • 2朱鸿 金凌紫.软件质量保障与测试[M].北京:科学出版社,1999..
  • 3IanSommerville.软件工程[M].北京:机械工业出版社,2007.
  • 4[1]Standish Group. The CHAOS Report[R].Found at http://www. standishgroup. com. 1995.
  • 5[2]The Inquiry Board. Ariane 5 Flight 105 Inquiry Board Report [ R ].Paris: European Space Agency Press,July 1996.
  • 6[3]National Science,Technology Council (NSTC). America in the Age of Information: A Forum on Federal Information and Communications R&D[R]. Bethesda, Maryland, July 6 - 7,1995.
  • 7[4]NSTC.Research challenges in high confidence systems[A]. Proceedings of the Committee on Computing, Information, and Communications Workshop[ C ]. USA: http://www. hpcc. gov/pubs/hcs-Aug97/intro.html, August 6 - 7,1997.
  • 8[5]High Confidence Systems Working Group, NSTC. Setting an interagency high confidence systems (HCS) research agenda [ A ]. Proceedings of the Interagency High Confidence Systems Workshop [ C ]. Arlington,Virginia,25 March 1998.
  • 9[6]High Confidence Software and Systems Coordinating Group. High Confidence Software and Systems Research Needs[ R]. USA: http://www.ccic. gov/pubs/hcss-research. pdf, January 10,2001.
  • 10[7]President's Information Technology Advisory Committee. Information Technology Research:Investing in Our Future[ R] .Report to the President, USA: http://www. cs. rice. edu/~ ken/presentations/PITAC.pdf, February 24,1999.

共引文献159

同被引文献1

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部