国际制度理论研究新转向与国际法学的贡献被引量：10

New Directions of International Institutionalist Theory and the Contributions of International Law Studies

导出

摘要国际关系学与国际法学是紧密关联的学科,国际制度研究是双方跨学科合作的平台。近年来,西方国际制度理论出现了新的研究转向,表现在两方面:一是国际制度的组织转向,即从国际制度研究转向国际组织研究;二是国际制度的治理转向,即从国际制度研究转向制度治理或全球治理研究。国际制度理论的新近转向为跨学科合作提供了新契机。从跨学科研究的视角出发,利用国际法的理论、观点与方法有助于阐述制度理论转向所产生的影响,推动制度理论的完善,提升认知世界事务、应对全球性问题的能力。同时,也证实了国际法学在制度理论转向过程中的作用。国际制度理论的新转向为我国国际关系研究者在跨学科合作研究中发挥作用提供了机遇。 In recent years,Western international institutionalist theory has taken new research directions:one is the turn to organizations,i.e.,from studying international institutions to studying international organizations;the other is the turn to governance,i.e.,from studying international institutions to studying institutional governance and global governance.These turns of international institutionalist theory provide new opportunities for interdisciplinary cooperation.From the perspective of interdisciplinary research,the theories,ideas,and methods of international law studies can help to explain the impact of the research turns,to improve institutionalist theory,and to elevate our ability to understand global affairs and tackle global problems.Meanwhile,it proves that international law studies have played a role in the research turns of institutionalist theory.

作者王明国

机构地区上海对外经贸大学法学院国际战略与政策分析研究所副教授

出处《国际政治研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第3期131-151,9-10,共21页 The Journal of International Studies

基金作者主持的2013年教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目“国际制度复杂性对东亚一体化进程的影响及我国对策研究”(项目批准号:13YJCGJW011)的阶段性成果中央财政支持地方高校发展专项资金上海市高校“085工程”项目资助上海对外经贸大学“085工程”重大攻关项目“全球治理机制有效性现状评估及中国参与的对策研究”(项目编号:Z085ZDGG13004)的资助

关键词国际政治理论国际制度国际法学国际关系学

分类号 D034 [政治法律—政治学] D99 [政治法律—国际法学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献84

1Oona Anne Hathaway and Harold Hongju Koh, Foundations of International Law and Politics, New York. Foundation Press, 2005, p. 2.
2Jan Klabbers, "The Relative Autonomy of International Law or The Forgotten Politics of Interdisciplinari- ty " Journal of International Law & International Relations,Vol. 1, No. 1-2, 2005, p. 41.
3Jeffrey L. Dunoff and Mark A. Pollack, "International Law and International Relations. Introducing an In- terdisciplinary Dialogue," in Jeffrey L. Dunoff and Mark A. Pollack, eds. , Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Interna- tional Law and International Relations. The State of the Art, Cambridge. Cambridge University Press, 2012, p. 11.
4Jan Klabbers, "The Bridge Crack' d. A Critical Look at Interdisciplinary Relations," International Rela- tions, Vol. 23, No. 1, 2009, p. 120.
5Colin Wight, " Philosophy of Social Science and International Relations," in Walter Carlsnaes, Thomas Risse, and Beth A. Simmons, eds. , Handbook of International Relations, Thousand Oaks, CA. Sage Publications, 2002, p. 35.
6Geoffrey Samuel, "Interdisciplinarity and the Authority Paradigm. Should Law Be Taken Seriously by Sci- entists and Social Scientists?" Journal of Law and Society, Vol. 36, No. 4, 2009, pp. 432-433.
7J. M. Balkin, "Interdisciplinarity as Colonization," Washington and Lee Law Review, Vol. 53, No. 3, 1996, pp. 949-970.
8Jan Klabbers, "The Bridge Crack'd. A Critical Look at Interdisciplinary Relations," p. 124.
9路甬祥.学科交叉与交叉科学的意义[J].中国科学院院刊,2005,20(1):58-60. 被引量：313
10Jeffrey L. Dunoff and Mark A. Pollack, "What Can International Relations Learn from International Law?" Legal Studies Research Paper, April 9, 2012, p. 37, http .//ssrn. corn/abstract = 2037299, 2013-03-17.