期刊文献+

三江源区生物质资源沼气化利用潜力评价 被引量:5

The evaluation of the renewable resource potentional in the source region of Yangtse river,Yellow river and Lantsang river
下载PDF
导出
摘要 分析和评价三江源区生物质能资源潜力,是建设庭院生态经济模式的基础。通过构建模型的方法,对三江源区的养殖业生产和牧区居民生活过程产生的畜禽粪便和人粪尿等生物质能源潜力进行了估算,分析结果表明,仅2011年,江河源区产生的牲畜粪便总量为5 819.31万t,人的粪便总量为135.92万t,合计5 955.23万t,如果进行沼气化利用,可产生沼气11.23-18.84亿m3,相当于7.97-13.38亿kg的标准煤,对三江源生态移民点和灾后恢复重建点发展能源型庭院生态经济模式具有重要作用。 It’s the resource basis of building mode of courtyard economy to analyze and evaluate the biomass energy resource of the three-river fountainhead .The article estimate the biomass energy potential ,such as livestock and poultry manure ,human excreta and so on ,which produced by the breeding production and the pastoral resident life process of the three-river fountainhead ,it shows that just in 2011 ,the total livestock and poultry manure produced by the three-riv-er fountainhead is 5 819 .31 × 104 t ,the total human excreta is 135 .92 × 104 t ,add up to 5 955 .23 × 104 t .If carry on biogas utilization ,it can produce 1 .123 × 108~1 .884 × 108 m3 of biogas ,which is equivalent to a standard of 7 .97 × 108~13 .38 × 108 kg .It plays an important role in ecological settlements and area of post-disaster reconstruction of the three-river fountainhead developing mode of energy courtyard economy .
出处 《干旱地区农业研究》 CSCD 北大核心 2013年第5期156-160,共5页 Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas
基金 十一五科技支撑计划项目"三江源移民安置区可持续发展关键技术研究与示范"(2009BAC61B04)
关键词 三江源区 生物质资源 潜力评价 the three-river fountainhead the biomass energy resource potentional evaluation
  • 相关文献

参考文献23

  • 1Aaheim A, Amundsen H, Dokken T, et al. Impacts and adaptation to climate change in European economies [ J ]. Global Environmental Change, 2012,22 (4) : 959-968.
  • 2Hewitt C, Mason S, Walland D. The global framework for climate ser- vices[J]. Nature Climate Change, 2012,2(12) : 831-832.
  • 3Chu S, Majumdar A. Opportunities and challenges for a sustainable energy future[J]. Nature, 2012,488:294-303.
  • 4Feng Y, Guo Y, Yang G, Qin X, et al. Household biogas develop- ment in rural China: On policy support and other macro sustainable conditions[J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2012,16: 5617-5624.
  • 5De Leo G A, Rizzi L, Caizzi A, et al. Carbon emissions: The eco-nomic benefits of the Kyoto Protocol[J]. Nature, 2001,413:478-479.
  • 6Joeri Rogelj David L, McCollum Brian C, O'Neill, et al. Emissions levels required to limit warming to below 2℃[J]. Nature Climate Change, 2013,3(3) :405-412.
  • 7York R. Asymmetric effects of economic growth and decline on C02 E- missions [ J ]. Nature Climate Change, 2012,2 ( 11 ) : 762-764.
  • 8Gumey K R. China at the carbon crossroads[ J]. Nature, 2012,458: 977 -979.
  • 9Marland G. Emissions accounting: China' s uncertain CO2 emissions [ J]. Nature Climate Change, 2012,2(9) :645-646.
  • 10Yah X Y, Oliver R, David A. Biofuels and synthetic fuels in the US and China: A review of Well-to-Wheel energy use and greenhouse gas emissions with the impact of land-use change[J]. Energy & Environ- mental Science, 2010,3(2) : 190-197.

二级参考文献60

共引文献144

同被引文献102

引证文献5

二级引证文献26

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部