期刊文献+

询价制度改革与中国股市IPO“三高”问题——基于网下机构投资者报价视角的研究 被引量:82

IPO Book-building Reform and the Problem of IPO "Three Highs" in China Stock Market:A Perspective of offline Institutional Investors' Quotes
原文传递
导出
摘要 2009年询价制度改革后,中国股票市场IPO过程中"三高"问题突出、财富分配不公现象严重。对此,本文基于网下机构报价信息披露,从机构投资者报价行为视角进行研究。研究发现,询价制度改革后,由于制度安排不合理,使得参与询价的机构投资者之间过度竞争,导致IPO定价过高,并产生了IPO"三高"问题,使得财富分配过于向发行人倾斜而不利于投资者。长期来看,随着询价申购阶段机构竞争程度加剧,IPO股票价格跌破发行价的可能性越高、长期超额投资回报越低,从而进一步论证了上述理论。本文的研究一定程度上打开了中国特色询价机制运行中的IPO定价黑箱、揭示了IPO"三高"问题背后的制度根源。 After the reform of IPO book - building mechanism in 2009, the problem of IPO "three highs" in China stock market is very serious. This paper studies these problems from the perspective of institutional investors' quotes during IPO book - building. We find that after the reform, unreasonable arrangement of IPO book - building mechanism results in the over - competition among institutional investors, which further results in IPO over- pricing, and leads to the problem of "three highs". Besides, we find that with the increasing of institutional investors' competition, the probability of the stock price below the issuing price increases in the fu- ture, and the abnormal return decreases more. This research opens the "black box" of IPO book - building process with Chinese characteristics and discloses institutional reason of unfairness during wealth allocation.
出处 《金融研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第10期167-180,共14页 Journal of Financial Research
基金 国家自然科学基金重点项目(70932003) 国家自然科学基金项目(71102036 71203091) 教育部人文社科青年项目(10YJC790352)资助
关键词 询价制度改革 IPO“三高” 机构投资者报价 过度竞争 IPO book - building Reform, IPO "Three Highs", Quotes of Institutional Investor, Over - competition
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1方军雄,方芳.新股发行制度市场化改革与融资超募现象[J].证券市场导报,2010(12):39-45. 被引量:39
  • 2刘志远,郑凯,何亚南.询价对象之间是竞争还是合谋——基于IPO网下配售特征的分析[J].证券市场导报,2011(3):35-44. 被引量:29
  • 3刘志远,郑凯,何亚南.询价制度第一阶段改革有效吗[J].金融研究,2011(4):158-173. 被引量:62
  • 4邵新建,巫和懋.中国IPO中的机构投资者配售、锁定制度研究[J].管理世界,2009,25(10):28-41. 被引量:46
  • 5BenvenisteL. M. and P. A. Spindt, 1989, “How Investment Bankers Determine the Offer Price and Allocation of NewIssues”,Journal of Financial Economics 24(2),pp. 343 -361.
  • 6Bhojraj S. and C. M. C. Lee, 2002 , “Who is My Peer? A Valuation - Based Approach to the Selection of ComparableFirms”,Journal of Accounting Research 40(2),pp. 407 -444.
  • 7Chemmanur T. J.,G. Hu, and J. K. Huang, 2010, 4<The Role of Institutional Investors in Initial Public Offering" , Re-view of Fi nancial Studies 23( 12),pp. 4490 - 4540.
  • 8Green T. C. and B. H. Hwang, 2012 , IPOs as Lotteries : Skewness Preference and First - Day Returns" , ManagementScience 58(2),pp. 432 -444.
  • 9Jenkinson T. and H. Jones,2009,“ IPO Pricing and Allocation : A Survey of the Views of Institutional Investors”,Reviewof Financial Studies 22(4),pp. 1477 -1504.
  • 10Liu X. D. and J. R. Ritter, 2010,“The Economic Consequences of IPO Spinning”,Review of Financial Studies 23(5), pp. 2024 -2059.

二级参考文献78

共引文献147

同被引文献880

引证文献82

二级引证文献473

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部