期刊文献+

国际海运服务环境保护之法律审视

A Legal Examination of Environmental Protection of International Maritime Transport Services
下载PDF
导出
摘要 国际海运服务环境保护不仅是国际环境法律问题,而且更是国际服务贸易法律问题。各国在国际海运服务环境保护中应该谨慎行使国家主权,善意履行国际义务,审慎利用生命例外原则,不应妨碍国际海运服务贸易自由化,并通过国际合作和真正落实共同但有区别责任原则来提高发展中国家和不发达国家参与国际海运服务环境保护的积极性和主动性,最终实现国际海运服务环境保护目标。 The environmental protection of international maritime transport services is a legal issue not only of international environment but also of international services trade. During protecting the environment in the course of international maritime transport services, every country should exercise its national sovereignty restrainedly, perform international obligations in good faith, impose the exception of protecting human, animal or plant life or health by prudence and should not hinder the liberalization of maritime transport services. In order to realize goals of environmental protection of maritime transport services ultimately, we should enhance the enthusiasm and initiative of developing and the least developed countries for taking part in environment protection of international maritime transport services by international cooperation and carrying on the principal of "common but differenced responsibility" really.
作者 佘少峰
出处 《国际商务研究》 北大核心 2013年第6期50-60,共11页 International Business Research
基金 教育部人文社科青年项目"科学发展观视野下我国航运强国战略实现的法律保障"(项目编号:09YJC820073) 上海哲学社会科学规划办公室一般项目"经济全球化下中国国际海运服务法律制度完善研究--兼论中国由海运大国迈向海运强国"(项目编号:2008BFX008)
关键词 国际海运服务 环境保护 法律审视 international maritime transport services environmental protection legal examination
  • 相关文献

参考文献28

  • 1高江虹欧盟海运碳税:马士基们无法承受之重[OL].21世纪经济报道http://www21cbh.tom[2012-03-02](2013-03-02).
  • 2Molenaar, Jaap Erik. Coastal State Jurisdiation over Vessel-Source Pollution[M], Hague: Kluwer Law International, 1998, 19-20.
  • 3Committee on Shipborne Wastes, National Research Council. Clean Ships, Clean Ports, Clean Oceans: Contro-lling Garbage and Plastic Wastes at Sea[M], Dulles: The National Academies Press, 1995: 157-160.
  • 4See: Tan, Alan Khee-Jin. Vessel-Source Marine Pollution: The Law and Politics of International Regulation[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006: 246.
  • 5See Hellenic Lines Ltd. v. Rhoditis, 398 U.S. 306, 316, 90 S.Ct. 1731, 1738, 26 L.Ed.2d 252, 1970 AMC 994 (1970).
  • 6The UNCTAD Secretariat. Review of Maritime Transport: 2012. UNCTAD/RMT/2012, UNITED NATIONS Publication, 41.
  • 7See: Griffin, Andrew. Marpo173/78 and Vessel Pollution: A Glass Half Full or Half Empty[J]. Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, 1994, Spring, 490-508.
  • 8余丽.欧洲法院关于欧盟航空排放交易指令合法性初裁[J].北京理工大学学报(社会科学版),2013,15(1):107-113. 被引量:9
  • 9Parrish, L. Austen. Reclaiming International Law from Extraterritoriality [J]. Minnesota Law Review, 2009, Feburary, 843.
  • 10R0diger, Wolfrum, et al. WTO-Trade in Services[M]. Boston :Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2008: 303.

二级参考文献34

  • 1杨兴.试论国际环境法的共同但有区别的责任原则[J].时代法学,2003,1(1):83-93. 被引量:26
  • 2于贵瑞,牛栋,王秋凤.《联合国气候变化框架公约》谈判中的焦点问题[J].资源科学,2001,23(6):10-16. 被引量:51
  • 3张笑成.《论国际环境法的共同但有区别责任原则》,华东政法学院硕士论文2003年.
  • 4金瑞林、汪劲.《20世纪环境法学研究述评》,北京:北京大学出版社,2003年,第317页.
  • 5《北京宣言》第2、4、6、7、8条.
  • 6《里约环境与发展宣言》原则6、7.
  • 7于冰.《遏制全球气候变暖是人类的共同责任》,《工人日报》2005年2月20日,第4版.
  • 8[法]亚历山大·基斯 张若斯译.国际环境法[M].法律出版社,2000.20.
  • 9United States - Measures Affecting the Cross - border Supply of Gambling and Betting Services ( complaint by Antigua and Babuda), Report of the Appellate Body, WT/DS285/AB/R, circulated 7 April 2005 ; Report of the Panel, WT/DS285/R, circulated 10 November 2004,专家组报告,第3.5段.专家组报告,第6.360—6.362段.专家组报告,第6.55—6.61段.专家组报告,第6.62—6.110段.专家组报告,第6.277—6.290段,第6.356—6.421段.专家组报告,第6.461—6.290段.专家组报告,第6.488—6.535段.专家组报告,第6.607段.专家组报告,第164—167段.上诉机构报告,第309—311段.上诉机构报告,第367—369段.专家组报告,第7.4段.
  • 10See W. Giles, U.S. Loses WTO Ruling Covering Online Gambling, http ://www. laavegassum, com/sunbin/stories/gaming/2004/mar/24/516580670. html.

共引文献35

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部