期刊文献+

定量冠状动脉造影和血管内超声预测左冠状动脉前降支单支病变致血流储备分数<0.80的价值 被引量:7

Optimized quantitative angiographic and intravascular ultrasound parameters predicting the functional significance of single de novo lesions in patients with unstable angina
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的本研究旨在针对左冠状动脉前降支(LAD)单支病变的不稳定型心绞痛(UA)患者,探讨定量冠状动脉造影(QCA)和血管内超声(IVUS)预测冠状动脉血流储备分数(FFR)<0.80的最佳临界值。方法连续入选169例LAD单支病变的患者,分别测定QCA、IVUS和FFR。使用受试者工作曲线(ROC)建立QCA和IVUS测定值预测FFR<0.80的价值。结果 99例患者(58.6%)FFR<0.80。最小管腔面积(MLA)和斑块负荷(PB)是预测FFR<0.80的两个独立因子。病变长度预测FFR<0.80的价值较小。MLA和PB预测总体LAD病变的FFR<0.80的临界值分别为3.03mm2和75.4%。MLA和PB对LAD近端(临界值分别为3.04 mm2和76.5%)及远端(临界值分别为2.82 mm2和80.6%)病变具有相似的诊断价值。联合MLA(2.82 mm2)和PB(80.6%)对于诊断远端LAD具有更大的意义。结论当病变局限在LAD时,MLA和PB预测FFR<0.80具有相似的诊断价值。联合MLA和PB对预测远端LAD病变的功能学意义具有更大的价值。 Objective The current study aimed at determine the best cutoff value of angiographic and intravascular ultrasound ( IVUS ) parameters for defining fractional flow reserve ( FFR ) 〈 O. 80 in patients with left anterior descending artery (LAD) lesion. Methods Quantitative coronary analysis, IVUS and FFR measurements were underwent in 169 patients with single LAD lesion. The best angiographic and IVUS cutoff value and their predictive value for FFR 〈 0. 80 were compared using Area under the Receiver- operator characteristic curve (AUC) in overall patients or in subgroups stratified by lesion sites. Results FFR 〈0. 80 was in 99 lesions(58. 6% ). Minimal lumen area (MLA), and plaque burden(PB) were two predictors of FFR 〈0. 80. Lesion length had less value in predicting FFR 〈 0. 80. The cutoff value of PB and MLA for FFR 〈 0. 80 was 75.4% and 3.03 mm2. MLA and PB had similar high diagnostic value for proximal (cutoff value 3.04 mm2 and 76. 5% ) and distal LAD lesion (2. 82 mm2 and 80. 6% ) . Combination of MLA (2. 82 mm2) and PB(80. 6% ) had increased diagnostic value for distal LAD lesion. Conclusions MLA and plaque burden had equivalent diagnostic value for FFR 〈 O. 80 when lesion localized in LAD. The predictive value of combination of MLA and plaque burden for distal LAD lesion was strengthened.
出处 《中国介入心脏病学杂志》 2013年第5期284-289,共6页 Chinese Journal of Interventional Cardiology
关键词 定量冠状动脉造影 血管内超声 血流储备分数 受试者工作特征曲线 诊断价值 Quantitative coronary analysis Intravascular ultrasound Fractional flow reserve Receiver operator curve Diagnostic value
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1Tobis J,Azarbal B,Slavin L. Assessment of intermediate severity coronary lesions in the catheterization laboratory. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2007,49 : 839 -848.
  • 2Topoi EJ, Nissen SE. Our preoccupation with coronary luminology. The dissociation between clinical and angiographic findings in ischemic heart disease. Circulation, 1995,92 :2333- 2342.
  • 3Abizaid AS, Mintz GS, Mehran R, et al. Long-term follow-up after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty was not performed based on intravascular ultrasound findings: importance of lumen dimensions. Circulation, 1999,100:256-261.
  • 4Tonino PA, Fearon WF,De Bruyne B, et al. Angiographic versus functional severity of coronary artery stenoses in the FAME study fractional flow reserve versus angiography in muhivessel evaluation. J Am Coil Cardiol,2010,55:2816-2821.
  • 5Takagi A, Tsurumi Y, Ishii Y, et al. Clinical potential of intravascular ultrasound for physiological assessment of coronary stenosis: relationship between quantitative ultrasound tomography and pressure-derived fractional flow reserve. Circulation, 1999, 100:250-255.
  • 6Briguori C,Anzuini A, Aimldi F, et al. Intravascular ultrasound criteria for the assessment of the functional significance of intermediate coronary artery stenoses and comparison with fractional flow reserve. Am J Cardiol,2001,87 :136-141.
  • 7Jasti V, Ivan E, Yalamanchili V, et al. Correlations between fractional flow reserve and intravascular ultrasound in patients with an ambiguous left main coronary artery stenosis. Circulation, 2004,110:2831-2836.
  • 8Lee CH, Tai BC, Soon CY, et al. New set of intravascular ultrasound-derived anatomic criteria for defining functionally significant stenoses in small coronary arteries (results from Intravascular Ultrasound Diagnostic Evaluation of Atherosclerosis in Singapore [ IDEAS] study). Am J Cardiol,2010,105 : 1378- 1384.
  • 9Melikian N, De Bondt P, Tonino P, et al. Fractional flow reserve and myocardial perfusion imaging in patients with angiographie multivessel coronary artery disease. JACC Cardiovase Interv, 2010,3:307-314.
  • 10Abizaid A,Mintz GS, Pichard AD, et al. Clinical, intravascular uhrasound, and quantitative angiographic determinants of the coronary flow reserve before and after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. Am J Cardiol, 1998,82:423-428.

同被引文献59

  • 1屈飞(综述),马洪山(审核).血流储备分数在冠心病临界病变介入诊疗中的应用[J].医学信息(医学与计算机应用),2014,0(18):639-640. 被引量:2
  • 2Steigen TK, Maeng M, Wiseth R, et al. Randomized study on simple versus complex stenting of coronary artery bifurcation lesions: the Nordicbifurcation study. Circulation, 2006, 114:1955-1961.
  • 3Valgimigli M, Malagutti P, Rodriguez-Granillo GA, et al. Distal left main coronary disease is a major predictor of outcome in patients undergoing percutaneous intervention in the drug-eluting stent era: an integrated clinical and angiographic analysis based on the Rapamycin-Eluting Stent Evaluated At Rotterdam Cardiology Hospital (RESEARCH) and Taxus-Stent Evaluated At Rotterdam Cardiology Hospital (T-SEARCH) registries..J Am Coil Cardiol, 2006, 47:1530-1537.
  • 4Kim YH1, Dangas GD, Solinas E, et al. Effectiveness of drug- eluting stent implantation for patients with unprotected left main coronary artery stenosis. Am J Cardiol, 2008, 101:801-806.
  • 5Nico H.J. Pijls, M.D., Ph.D.,, et al. Measurement of fractional flow reserve to assess the functional severity of coronary artery stenoses. N Engl J Med, 1996, 334:1703-1708.
  • 6De Bruyne B1, Pijls NH, Bartunek J,et al. Fractional flow reserve in patients with prior myocardial infarction. Circulation, 2001, 104: 157-162.
  • 7N.H. Pijls, B. Van Gelder, P. Van der Voort, et al. Fractional flow reserveA useful index to evaluate the influence of an epicardial coronary stenosis on myocardial blood flow. Circulation, 1995, 92:3183-3193.
  • 8Koo BK, Park KW, Kang H J, et al. Physiological evaluation of the provisional side-branch intervention strategy for bifurcation lesions using fractional flow reserve. Eur Heart J, 2008, 29:726-732.
  • 9Mintz GS, Nissen SE, Anderson WD, et al. American College of Cardiology clinical expert consensus document on standards for acquisition,measurement and reporting of intravascular ultrasound studies (IVUS) A report of the American College of Cardiology Task Force on Clinical Expert Consensus Documents.J Am Coll Cardiol, 2001, 37:1478-1492.
  • 10Jasti V, Ivan E, Yalamanchili V, et al. Correlations between fractional flow reserve and intravascular ultrasound in patients with an ambiguous left main coronary artery stenosis. Circulation, 2004,110:2831-2836.

引证文献7

二级引证文献47

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部