期刊文献+

Hero642镍钛机动器械一次性根管治疗 被引量:7

Hero642 nickel-titanium rotary instrument for single-visit root canal treatment
下载PDF
导出
摘要 背景:多项研究表明Hero642是一种安全性能较高的机用镍钛锉,其根管成形能力良好。目的:评价Hero642镍钛机动器械一次性根管治疗的临床效果。方法:选择400例牙髓炎或根尖炎患者,分别采用Hero642镍钛机动器械和手用镍钛根管锉进行一次性根管治疗,记录根管预备时间、患牙治疗后1周疼痛情况,并评价2年后根管治疗效果,计算治疗后1周疼痛率和治疗2年后的成功率。结果与结论:Hero642镍钛机动器械组平均单根管预备时间为(3.57±0.76)min,手用镍钛根管锉组为(7.62±0.25)min,两组根管预备时间比较差异有显著性意义(P<0.01);Hero642镍钛机动器械组和手用镍钛根管锉组治疗后1周疼痛的发生率分别3.5%和22.8%,两组间比较差异有显著性意义(P<0.01);治疗后2年Hero642镍钛机动器械组和手用镍钛根管锉组治疗成功率分别为94.4%,92.4%,两组治疗效果比较差异无显著性意义。表明采用Hero642镍钛机动器械进行一次性根管治疗时间短、术后反应小,效果良好。 BACKGROUND:Several studies have shown that Hero642 is a rotary nickel-titanium file with high safe performance, and its ability of root canal shaping is good. OBJECTIVE:To observe the clinical effect of single-visit root canal treatment using Hero642 nickel-titanium rotary instrument on teeth with chronic pulpitis and apical periodontitis. METHODS:Total y 400 teeth with chronic pulpitis and apical periodontitis were operated by Hero642 nickel-titanium rotary instrument and nickel-titanium hand file, respectively. The efficiency of root canal preparation was taken. Pain reactions were recorded 1 week after operation and curative effects were evaluated 2 years after root canal treatment. Rates of pain and success were calculated at 1 week and 2 years after treatment, respectively. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION:The average time for root canal preparation was (3.57±0.76) minutes in the Hero642 group and (7.62±0.25) minutes in the hand file group, and there was a significant difference between the two groups (P〈0.01). After 1 week of treatment, the pain rates were 3.5%and 22.8%in the two groups, respectively, showing a significant difference (P〈0.01). Two-year fol ow-up was performed, and ratios of success were 94.4%in the Hero642 group and 92.4%in the hand file group, but there was no difference between the two groups. Hero642 nickel-titanium rotary instrument for single-visit root canal treatment showed excellent efficiency on clinical treatment, reduced treatment period and had less postoperative reactions.
出处 《中国组织工程研究》 CAS CSCD 2013年第42期7408-7413,共6页 Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research
关键词 生物相容性材料 根管疗法 牙科器械 疼痛 biocompatible materials root canal therapy dental instruments pain
  • 相关文献

参考文献30

  • 1Civjan S,Huget EF,DeSimon LB. Potential applications of certain nickel-titanium (nitinol) al oys[J].{H}Journal of Dental Research,1975,(01):89-96.
  • 2Walia HM,Brantley WA,Gerstein H. An initial investigation ofthe bending and torsional properties of Nitinol root canal files[J].{H}Journal of Endodontics,1988,(07):346-351.
  • 3Schafer E,Zapke K. A comparative scanning electron microscopicinvestigation of the efficacy of manual and automated instrumentationof root canals[J].{H}Journal of Endodontics,2000,(11):660-664.
  • 4?elik D,Ta?demir T,Er K. Comparative study of 6 rotary nickel-titanium systems and hand instrumentation for root canal preparation in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth[J].{H}Journal of Endodontics,2013,(02):278-282.
  • 5Vaudt J,Bitter K,Neumann K. Ex vivo study on root canal instrumentation of two rotary nickel-titanium systems in comparison to stainless steel hand instruments[J].{H}International Endodontic Journal,2009,(01):22-33.
  • 6Yoshimine Y,Ono M,Akamine A. The shaping effects of three nickel-titanium rotary instruments in simulated S-shaped canals[J].{H}Journal of Endodontics,2005,(05):373-375.
  • 7Rhodes SC,Hülsmann M,McNeal SF. Comparison of root canal preparation using reciprocating Safesiders stainless steel and Vortexnickel-titanium instruments[J].{H}Oral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology Oral Radiology and Endodontics,2011,(05):659-667.
  • 8汪轶,朱亚琴,王海宁,韩俊力,何艳,朱铭颐.3种机动镍钛器械预备磨牙根管的效果评价[J].上海口腔医学,2010,19(2):118-123. 被引量:16
  • 9肖海波.三种机用镍钛器械在根管治疗中的临床应用比较[J].临床口腔医学杂志,2010,26(6):353-354. 被引量:9
  • 10梁景平.我国根管治疗的现状分析[J].中华口腔医学杂志,2010,45(7):385-388. 被引量:11

二级参考文献139

共引文献420

同被引文献78

二级引证文献48

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部