我国的收入转移与集中趋势

Income Transference and Concentration in China

我国的收入转移可以从增加值、初次分配、再分配、总体分配这四个环节进行考察。在初次分配阶段,政府部门的正转移率非常高,说明政府部门在初次分配阶段,通过征收生产税净额,在补偿公共品生产的耗费之后,掌握了大量的剩余。在再分配阶段,政府部门的正转移率趋于提高,住户部门的正转移率趋于下降。在总体分配阶段,政府部门的正转移率在初次分配的基础上进一步提高。在1992-1999年,收入趋于分散。在2000-2008年,收入趋于集中。这反映了我国政府推动型经济的性质不仅没有转变,反而在不断强化。我国这种政府强力推动的经济,虽然在经济增长方面取得巨大成绩,但不可避免导致一系列严重问题,与中央政府提出的转变经济增长方式和转变政府职能的要求完全背道而驰。从原则上看,解决问题寄希望于:第一,加强制约政府增加收入的力量;第二,削弱政府高投资的意愿。

The examination of income transference in China may be done from such stages as that of the added value,of the initial distribution,of redistribution and of the overall distribution. In the second,transference to the government is very positive,meaning that governmental sectors still get possession of a large amount of left-out income,levied through the net taxes on production,after the public-goods production has been sufficiently financed. In the third,positive transference rate of the governmental departments is increasing,while that of the household sectors is declining. In the forth,positive transference rate of governmental departments tends to go up on the basis of initial distribution. In 1992- 1999,income tended to disperse,but to concentrate in 2000- 2008. This means that the nature of our economy as a government-driven type does not have any change,but continued to be enhanced instead. This type of economy,with its great achievements in economic growth,inevitably leads to a series of serious problems and goes against the change of the economic growth mode and of the government functions intended by the central government. Theoretically,a solution may include: first,restricting governments' power in income increase; and second,putting a damper on governmental investment.