期刊文献+

公司成熟度、剩余负债能力与现金股利政策——基于财务柔性视角的实证研究 被引量:27

Firm Maturity,Spare Debt Capacity and Cash Dividend Policy:Empirical Study from a Perspective of Financial Flexibility
原文传递
导出
摘要 文章基于财务柔性视角,探讨了剩余负债能力对公司现金股利支付生命周期特征的影响机理,并利用中国上市公司2005-2011年数据进行了实证检验。研究发现,现金股利支付与公司成熟度总体上正相关,但当公司剩余负债能力不同时,两者的正相关关系会发生变化:当剩余负债能力较高时,两者之间不再存在正相关关系;而当剩余负债能力较低时,两者之间的正相关关系增强。文章研究结论从财务柔性角度拓展了现金股利政策的生命周期理论,并为公司管理者和政府监管部门的相关决策提供了新的思路。 From a perspective of financial flexibility, this paper discusses the effect of spare debt capacity on the life cycle characteristics of cash dividend pay- ments and makes an empirical test by using the data of Chinese listed companies from 2005 to 2011. It comes to the following conclusions, overall cash dividend payments are positively correlated with firm maturity, but in companies with dif- ferent spare debt capacity, this positive correlation will change, that is to say in companies with higher spare debt capacity, this positive correlation does not exist and in companies with lower spare debt capacity, this positive correlation strengthens. These conclusions extend the life cycle theory of cash dividend policy from a perspective of financial flexibility and provide new ideas for decision-making of managers and regulators.
作者 董理 茅宁
机构地区 南京大学商学院
出处 《财经研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第11期59-68,共10页 Journal of Finance and Economics
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(71372031 71072040)
关键词 现金股利 公司成熟度 剩余负债能力 财务柔性 生命周期理论 cash dividend firm maturity spare debt capacity finan-cial flexibility firm life cycle theory
  • 相关文献

参考文献20

二级参考文献109

  • 1江伟,李斌.制度环境、国有产权与银行差别贷款[J].金融研究,2006(11):116-126. 被引量:357
  • 2李寿喜.产权、代理成本和代理效率[J].经济研究,2007,42(1):102-113. 被引量:414
  • 3Fama, E., French, K. R., 2001, Disappearing dividend: changing firm characteristics or lower propensity to pay? Journal of Financial Economics, 60, pp.3-43.
  • 4Lintner J. Distribution of Incomes of Corporations among Dividends, Retained Earning, and Taxes [J]. American Economic Review, 1965, (46).
  • 5Dhrymes P., Kurz,M. Investment, Dividends and External Finance Behavior of Firms, in Determinates of Investment Behavior[R]. New York: Nation Bureau of Economic Research, 1967.
  • 6Jensen Meckling. Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure[J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 1976, (3).
  • 7Rozeff M. Growth, Beta and Costs as Determinants of Dividend Payout Ratio [J]. Journal of Financial Research, 1982, (3).
  • 8J.Fred Weston, Thomas E.Copeland. Modern Finance and Industrial Economics[M]. Oxford,UK:B.Blackwell,1987.
  • 9Smith C., L.Watts. The Investment Opportunity Set, and Corporate Financing, Dividend, and Compensation Policies[J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 1992, (32).
  • 10Dempsey S.J., G.Laber. Effects of Agency and Transaction Costs on Dividend Payout Ratios: Further Evidence of the Agency-transaction Hypothesis[J]. Journal of Financial Research,1992, (15).

共引文献228

同被引文献442

引证文献27

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部