期刊文献+

苯醚甲环唑在烟叶和土壤中农药残留与降解 被引量:4

Residues and Decline Dynamics of Difenoconazole in Tobacco and Soil
原文传递
导出
摘要 【目的】研究苯醚甲环唑在烟草上的合理安全使用,为农药使用和限量制定提供科学依据。【方法】建立烟叶及其土壤中苯醚甲环唑农药残留的气相色谱检测方法,并测定烟叶及土壤中苯醚甲环唑农药残留降解动态和烤后烟叶中的最终残留量。【结果】苯醚甲环唑在烟叶中降解较快,土壤中相对偏慢,半衰期分别为4.84-7.74、15.20-17.68d,施药后35d,烟叶中农药残留降解率达90%以上,在土壤中的降解率超过80%。苯甲·福美双可湿性粉剂按苯醚甲环唑有效成分150、225ga.i./hm^2于烟草现蕾期喷雾3-4次,距末次施药后间隔21d采样,烟叶中苯醚甲环唑的残留量为0.86~9.61mg/kg,土壤中的残留量低于0.18mg/kg。 [Aims] It was to provide guidance for safe and reasonable use and MRL of difenoconazole on tobacco. [Methods] The analytical method of difenoconazole and dissipation dynamics in tobacco leaf and soil were investigated, [Results] Results of the decline dynamics study showed that the dissipation in fresh tobacco leaves was faster than in soil, and half-life (t1/2) were 4.84-7.74 d in fresh tobacco leaves and 15.20-17.68 d in soil, respectively. 35 Days after application, the residue remained less than 10% of initialization in fresh tobacco leaves, and less than 20% of initialization in soil. The ultimate residues of difenoconazole in curied tobacco leaves and soil were determined after the third and fourth application at levels of 150 and 225 g a.i./ha, with the residues ranging from 0.86-9.61 mg/kg in tobacco leaves and below 0.18 mg/kg in soil 21 days after the last treatment.
出处 《农药》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2013年第11期821-823,841,共4页 Agrochemicals
基金 国家烟草专卖局重点项目(TS-06-20110039 110200902073)
关键词 苯醚甲环唑 烟叶 土壤 农药残留 降解 difenoconazole tobacco leaf soil pesticide residue dissipation
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

二级参考文献42

共引文献143

同被引文献88

  • 1王忠华.转Bt基因水稻对土壤微生态系统的潜在影响[J].应用生态学报,2005,16(12):2469-2472. 被引量:31
  • 2王一茹.应重视和支持食品中农药残留检测[J].农业环境与发展,1996,13(1):22-24. 被引量:18
  • 3徐珍,郭正元,黄帆,杨仁斌,唐美珍.霸螨灵、克螨特及其混剂对土壤过氧化氢酶的影响[J].农业环境科学学报,2006,25(6):1654-1658. 被引量:3
  • 4何巧力,颜增光,汪群慧,李发生.利用蚯蚓回避试验方法评价萘污染土壤的生态风险[J].农业环境科学学报,2007,26(2):538-543. 被引量:8
  • 5周军英,单正军,石利利,等.农药生态风险评价与风险管理技术[M].北京:中国环境科学出版社,2012.
  • 6Cunha J P, Chueca P, Garcerd C, et al. Risk assessment of pesticide spray drifl from citrus applications with air-blast sprayers in Spain[J]. Crop Protection, 2012, 42:116-123.
  • 7USEPA. EPA/630/R-95/002F Guidelines for ecological risk assessment[R/ OL]. (1998-05-14). http://www, epa. gov/raf/publications/pdfs/E- COTXTBX. PDF.
  • 8USEPA. EPA/600/R-05/111 PRZM-3, A model for predicting pesti- cide and nitrogen fate in the crop root and unsaturated soil zones:Users manual for release 3.0[R/OL]. ( 2005 -09 -21 ). http ://www. epa. gov/ athens/publications/reports/Suarez600R05111PRZM3, pdf.
  • 9Foeks A, Horst M, van den Berg E, et al. Integrating chemical fate and population-level effect models for pesticides at landscape scale:New options for risk assessment[J]. Ecological Modelling, 2014, 280: 102- 116.
  • 10Beinat E, Berg R van den. EUPHIDS: A decision support system for the admission of pesticides [EB/OL]. [ 1996-4- 30]. http ://www. rivm. nl/ dsresource objectid =rivmp : 19299&type =org&disposition =inline&ns_ ne=1.

引证文献4

二级引证文献13

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部