期刊文献+

10%溴氰虫酰胺OF对水稻稻纵卷叶螟的田间药效评价

Efficacy Evaluation of Cyantraniliprole 10% OF against Cnaphalocrocis medinalis Guenée
原文传递
导出
摘要 [目的]明确10%溴氰虫酰胺油悬浮剂对稻纵卷叶螟的防治效果及使用剂量。[方法]采用田间茎叶喷雾法检测防治效果,以邓肯氏新复极差法检验差异显著性。【结果】10%溴氰虫酰胺油悬浮剂20~40ga.i.mm^2剂量处理,药后15d,保叶效果85.80%-90.60%,防虫效果90.55%-94.24%,与20%氯虫苯甲酰胺悬浮剂30ga.i./hm^2的防效相当,比40%毒死蜱乳油600ga.i./hm^2的防效好。【结论】10%溴氰虫酰胺油悬浮剂1).220-40ga.i./hm^2剂量处理能有效控制稻纵卷叶螟的为害,可以在生产上推广应用。 [Aims] The aims of the research is to confirm the efficacy and the optimum dosage of cyantraniliprole 10% OF on controlling Cnaphalocrocis medinalis Guen6e in rice field. [Methods] Using the method of field spray on stems-leaves of rice, the efficacy of cyantraniliprole 10% OF against C. medinalis was determined. And the Duncan's new multiple range test (DMRT) was used to analyze and test the significance of differences. [Results] On the 15th day after treatment with dosage of 20-40 g a.i./ha of cyantraniliprole 10% OF, the protective effect on rice leaves was 85,80-90.60%, the insecticidal effect on larvae of C. medinalis was 90.55-94.24%. The results indicated that there were no significant difference of efficacy between the cyantraniliprole and the chlorantraniliprole 20% SC of 30 g a.i./ha. But compared with the chlorpyrifos 40% EC of 600 g a.i./ha, the cyantraniliprole performed better control effect on the C. medinalis. [Conclusions] The dosage of 20-40 g a.i./ha of cyantraniliprole 10% OF could effectively control the damage by C. medinalis, it can be applied and extended in rice to guarantee the safety of grain production..
出处 《农药》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2013年第11期842-843,共2页 Agrochemicals
基金 福建省科技计划项目(2009R10028-2)
关键词 溴氰虫酰胺 稻纵卷叶螟 药效 cyantraniliprole Cnaphalocrocis medinalis Guen6e efficacy
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献60

  • 1周宇杰,徐铁平,陈月娣,蔡国梁.四种药剂对稻纵卷叶螟的田间药效试验[J].江西农业学报,2011,23(1):113-114. 被引量:32
  • 2吕昭智,李进步,田卫东,田长彦.生物多样性在害虫控制中的生态功能与机理[J].干旱区研究,2005,22(3):400-404. 被引量:29
  • 3翟保平,程家安.2006年水稻两迁害虫研讨会纪要[J].昆虫知识,2006,43(4):585-588. 被引量:103
  • 4Agnew CW, Smith JW, 1989. Ecology of spiders (Araneae) in a peanut agroecosystem. Environ. Entomol., 18( 1 ) : 30 -42.
  • 5Andow DA, 1991. Vegetational diversity and arthropod population response. Annu. Rev. Entomol., 36(1): 561 -586.
  • 6Chamberlain K, Khan Z, Pickett J, Toshova T, Wadhams L, 2006. Diel periodicity in the production of green leaf volatiles by wild and cultivated host plants of stemborer moths, Chilo partellus and Busseola fusca. J. Chem. Ecol., 32 (3) : 565 - 577.
  • 7Cook SM, Khan ZR, Pickett JA, 2007. The use of push-pull strategies in integrated pest management. Annu. Rev. Entomol., 52 (1) : 375 - 400.
  • 8Corbett A, Plant RE, 1993. Role of movement in the response of natural enemies to agroecosystem diversification: a theoretical evaluation. Environ. Entomol., 22 : 519 - 531.
  • 9Hansen J, New T, 2005. Use of barrier pitfall traps to enhance inventory surveys of epigaeic Coleoptera. J. Insect Conserv., 9 ( 2 ) : 131 - 136.
  • 10Hooks CRR, Johnson MW, 2003. Impact of agricultural diversification on the insect community of cruciferous crops. Crop Prot., 22 : 223 - 238.

共引文献190

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部