期刊文献+

Poisson回归模型和负二项回归模型在评价药物安全性中的应用

Application of Poisson Regression Model and Negative Binomial Regression Model in Drug Safety Evaluation
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:应用Poisson回归模型和负二项回归模型评价药物的安全性,分析不良事件发生的影响因素。方法:对某上市降糖药的前瞻性临床研究进行实例分析,以处理、性别、年龄及其他基线情况为影响因素,以胃肠道不良事件的发生次数为反应变量,拟合Poisson回归模型及负二项回归模型。结果:Lagrange乘子检验统计量为7.701 5(P=0.005 5),资料存在过离散;负二项回归模型偏差411.146 8,低于Poisson回归模型的偏差546.893 1,负二项回归模型较优。使用负二项回归模型拟合资料,模型有统计学意义,"性别"进入回归模型。结论:负二项回归模型应用于药物的安全性评价,可以解决传统药物安全性评价中仅考虑不良事件发生例数而未考虑例次的不足,能进一步分析影响不良事件发生频次的影响因素,有益于更全面深入地评价药物安全性。 OBJECTIVE: To apply Poisson regression model and negative binomial regression model for the drug safety evalua- tion, so as to analyze influential factors of adverse events. METHODS: By analyzing prospective clinical trial of marketed hypoglyce- mic agents, Poisson regression model and negative binomial regression model were fitted, using treatment, gender, age and baseline as influential factors and the number of gastrointestinal adverse events as response variable. RESULTS: The statistics of Lagrange test was 7.701 5(P=0.005 5), and data dispersion had existed. The bias of negative binomial regression model was 411.146 8, which was lower than 546.893 1 of Poisson regression model; the negative binomial regression mode/ was better than Poisson model. There was statistical significance of negative binomial regression model and gender factor was included in the regression model. CONCLUSIONS: The application of negative binomial regression model in drug safety evaluation which analyzes not only the num- ber of adverse events but also the frequency of them, and further analyzes the influential factors of adverse events, contributes to the more comprehensive evaluation of drug safety.
出处 《中国药房》 CAS CSCD 2013年第42期3995-3997,共3页 China Pharmacy
关键词 POISSON回归 负二项回归 胃肠道不良事件 Poisson regression model Negative binomial regression model Gastrointestinal adverse events
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献13

  • 1Chuang-Stein C. Safety analysis in controlled clinical trials[ J ].Drug Information Journal, 1998, 32:1363S-1372S.
  • 2ICH Harmonised Tripartite Guideline. Statistical principles for clinical trials [ EB/OL ]. At http :∥www. ich. org/pdfICH/e9.pdf, 1998.
  • 3ICH Harmonised Tripartite Guideline. Statistical principles for clinical trials [ EB/OL]. At http:∥/www. ich. org/pdfICH/e3. pdf,1998.
  • 4North PH. Ensuring good statistical practice in clinical research:Guildelines for standard operating procedures ( an update) [ J ].Drug Information Journal, 1998, 32:665-682.
  • 5Jerald FL. Negative binomial and mixed Poisson regression[J].Can J Stat, 1987;15(3):209-225.
  • 6Byers AL, Heather A, Thomas MG, et al. Application of negative binomial modelling for discrete outcomes:A case study in aging research[J]. J Clin Epidemiol, 2003;56:559-564.
  • 7Welsh AH, Cunningham RB, Chambers RL. Methodology for estimating the abundance of rare animals: Seabirds nesting on North East Herald Cay[J]. Biometrics, 2000;56:22-30.
  • 8Lee AH, Wang K, Yau KW, et al. Truncated negative binomial mixed regression modelling of ischaemic stroke hospitalizations[J]. Stat Med, 2003;22:1129-1139.
  • 9SAS software system. Version 8.1. Cary (NC): SAS Institute; 2000.
  • 10Scott J. Regression models for categorical and limited dependent variables[M]. CA: Sage Publications, 1997:217-249.

共引文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部