摘要
作"买+一般可能补语"宾语的词语都是体词性词语。实际语料用例中,"买不了"后亦为体词性宾语,"你买不了吃亏,你买不了上当"中"吃亏、上当"在词典词性标注中都为动词,"买不了+动词"结构违反了一般的语法规律。语用频率效应、语义特征分析、动词名物化、有界无界说都不能从本质上解释此现象,语义和谐律是其合理存在的本质动因。
Those words which function as the objects of "mai (buy)" following the pattern "Mai (buy) + normally a possible com- plement" are usually nominal ones. Nevertheless, in the special sentence pattern "Ni maibuliao chikui, ni maibuliao shangdang", the object - serving words "chikui" and "shangdang" are both verbs in the dictionary, turning the original pattern into "maibuliao + V" which violates the general rule of grammar. The pragmatic frequency effect, semantic characteristic analysis , verb is used as noun,the bounded and unbounded theory all fail to explain the linguistic phenomenon in essence. As a matter of fact, the Semantic Harmony Principle is the real rationale for its existence.
出处
《绍兴文理学院学报》
2013年第5期79-82,共4页
Journal of Shaoxing University
关键词
"买不了+吃亏
上当"
可能补语
语义和谐律
Mai Buliao + Chikui / Shangdang
possible complement
semantic harmony principle