摘要
在醉酒驾驶和追逐竞速驾驶受到危险驾驶罪规制之后,药后驾驶行为也应当纳入到该罪的范畴内。这是风险刑法语境下的必然要求,也是相同行为相同处理的应有之义。在域外国家和地区立法将药后驾驶行为犯罪化的今天,我国仅仅将产生严重危害后果的药后驾驶按照交通肇事罪或者以危险方法危害公共安全罪来定罪,而将未产生严重危害后果的药后驾驶仅予以行政处罚,存在调控范围不全面、所需构成要件严格和调控手段失调的弊端,可能导致药后驾驶的失控。因此,我国刑法应当将服用毒品和部分合法药品后进行的驾驶作为危险驾驶罪处理,并采纳主客观相结合的证据标准来判断被告人是否构成药后驾驶型的危险驾驶罪。
While the acts of drunk driving and racing have been regulated by the crime of dangerous driving, the drugged driving should be incorporated into the crime of dangerous driving too. It is the inevitable demand of Risikostrafrecht and in conformity with the principle of the same behavior with the same treatment. Compared with the fact that foreign countries and regions have criminalized the drugged driving, our regulation method is unbalanced. So we need to incorporate the driving after taking illegal drugs, narcotic drug and some legal drugs into the crime of dangerous driving and employ the subjective and objective evidence to judge whether the defendant constitutes the drugged driving.
出处
《中南大学学报(社会科学版)》
CSSCI
2013年第5期117-124,共8页
Journal of Central South University:Social Sciences
基金
国家社会科学基金重大项目子课题"现代城市交通安全的法律调控机制研究"(11&ZD160)
关键词
药后驾驶
毒后驾驶
危险驾驶罪
风险刑法
driving while taking drugs
drugged driving
dangerous driving
risikostrafrecht