期刊文献+

血清NSE,CEA,SCC,CYFRA21-1和ProGRP联合检测诊断肺癌及与其病理分型的关系 被引量:4

Diagnostic Value and Pathological Classfication of Combined Determination of Serum Tumor Markers (NSE,CEA,CYFRA21-1,SCCA and ProGRP) Levels in Patients with Lung Cancer
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的 探讨神经元特异度烯醇化酶(NSE)、癌胚抗原(CEA)、鳞状细胞癌抗原(SCCA)、细胞角蛋白19片段(CYFRA21-1)和胃泌素释放肽前体(ProGRP)在肺癌诊断中的价值,分析几项肿瘤标志物水平与其病理分型的关系.方法 采用化学发光法分别检测64例肺癌患者,58例肺良性疾病患者血清NSE,CEA,SCCA,CYFRA21-1及ProGRP的含量.结果 肺癌组各肿瘤标志物血清水平皆显著高于肺部良性疾病组(t=3.36~7.41,P值均〈0.05),NSE+CEA+CYFRA21-1+SCCA+ProGRP 联检对肺癌诊断的灵敏度、特异度和准确度分别为81.25%,82.76%和81.97%,灵敏度和准确度明显大于各标志物单项检测(t=3.11~4.13,P值均〈0.05),肺癌肿瘤标志物血清水平与病理类型有关,血清NSE,ProGRP水平在小细胞肺癌(SCLC)时显著升高(F=31.20,P〈0.05),CEA在腺癌时显著升高(F=25.36,P〈0.05),而血清CYFRA21-1和SCCA水平则在鳞癌时显著升高(F=11.24~25.36,P值均〈0.05).结论 NSE,CEA,CYFRA21-1,SCCA及ProGRP肿瘤标志物检测有利于指导肺癌的病理分型,其联检明显提高了对肺癌诊断的灵敏度. Objective To study the diagnostic value and pathological classfication of determination of serum levels of NSE, CEA,CYFRA21-1,SCCA and ProGRP inpatients with lung cancer. Methods Serum NSE, CEA, CYFRA21-1, SCCA and ProGRP (with CLIA) levels were measured singly or combinedly in 64 patients with lung cancer and 58 patients with vari-ous kinds of benign lung disorders. Results The levels of serum NSE,CEA,CYFRA21-1,SCCA and ProGRP in patients with lung cancer were all significantly higher than the respective levels in patients with benign lung diseases (P〈0.05). The sensitivity and accuracy of combined determination of NSE, CEA, CYFRA21-1 was 81.25%, 82.76% and 81.97% respec-tively,being higher (P〈0. 05) than that with any single determination. For various pathological types of lung cancer,the levels of NSE and ProGRP in SCLC were significantly higher than adenocarcinom and squamous ceil carcinoma, the levels of CEA in adenocarcinom was significantly higher than SCLC,and the levels of CYFRA21-1 and SCCA in squamous cell earci-noma were significantly higher than adenocarcinom and SCLC. Conclusion Determination of serum levels of NSE,CEA,CY-FRA21-1 ,SCCA and ProGRP is helpful for clinical diagnosis of lung cancer,combined determination can increase the sensi-tivity.
出处 《现代检验医学杂志》 CAS 2013年第5期89-92,共4页 Journal of Modern Laboratory Medicine
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1Tiseo M, Ardizzoni A, Cafferata MA, et al. Predictive and prognostic significance of neuron-specific enolase (NSE) in non-small cell lung Cancer[J]. Anticancer Research, 2008,28 (1B) : 507-513.
  • 2Molina R, Aug6 JM, Bosch X, et al. Use{ulness of ser- um tumor markers, including progastrin-releasing peptide,in patients with lung cancer., correlation with histology[J]. Turnour Biology the Journal of the In- ternational Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine,2009,30(3) 121-129.
  • 3Grunnet M, Sorensen JB. Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) as tumor marker in lung cancer[J]. Lung Cancer, 2012,76 (2) : 138-143.
  • 4税莉莉.肺癌患者血清中CEA、CYFRA21-1、NSE、SCC检测的临床意义[J].西安交通大学学报(医学版),2010,31(6):708-710. 被引量:30
  • 5黄芳,耿燕,李婷婷,张西英.血清CEA,CA125,NSE,CYFRA21-1联合检测对肺癌的诊断价值[J].现代检验医学杂志,2008,23(6):97-99. 被引量:17
  • 6Ardizzoni A, Cafferata MA, Tiseo M, et al. Decline in serum carcinoembryonic antigen and cytokeratin 19 fragment during chemotherapy predicts objective re-sponse and survival in patients with advanced nons- mall cell lung cancer[J]. Cancer, 2006,107 (12) : 2842- 2849.
  • 7Wang J, Zhang N, Li B, et al. Decline of serum CY- FRA21-1 during chemoradiotherapy of NSCLC: a probable predictive factor for tumor response [J]. Tumour Biology: the Journal of the International Soci- ety for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine, 201 1, 32 (4) 689-695.

二级参考文献12

共引文献45

同被引文献35

  • 1林婉媚,卢劲松,魏换娣.血清CYFRA21-1、CEA检测对非小细胞肺癌病理分型的诊断分析[J].黑龙江医学,2013,37(9):824-825. 被引量:4
  • 2章毅,王永志.根据血清胱抑素C浓度推测肾小球滤过率的临床应用[J].中国血液净化,2004,3(12):655-656. 被引量:52
  • 3李萍,赵莹,黄亨健,彭志英,徐克和.胱蛋白酶抑制剂C对肾小球滤过功能的评价[J].中华检验医学杂志,2005,28(5):515-516. 被引量:29
  • 4Lukaszewicz M, Mroczko B, Gryko M, et al. Comparison between clinical significance of serum proinflammatory proteins (IL-6 and CRP )and classic tumor markers (CEA and CAl9-9 ) in gastric cancer [ J ]. Clin Exp Med,2011 ,ll (2) :89-96.
  • 5Harmsma M,Schutte B,Ramaekers FC. Serum mark- ers in small cell lung cancer: opportunities for im- provement[J]. Biochim Biophys Acta, 2013,1836 (2) : 255-272.
  • 6Pass HI, Beer DG,Joseph S, et al. Biomarkers and molecular testing for early detection, diagnosis, and therapeutic prediction of lung cancer[J]. Thorac Surg Clin,2013,23(2) :211-224.
  • 7Winther-Larsen A, Hoffmann L, Moeller DS, et al. E- valuation of factors associated with loco-regional fail- ure and survival in limited disease small cell lung cancer patients treated with chemoradiotherapy[J]. Acta Oneol,2015,54(9) : 1574-1581.
  • 8Kalemkerian GP, Akerley W, Bogner P, et al. Small cell lung cancer[J]. J Natl Compr Canc Netw, 2013, 11(1):78-98.
  • 9Yang H J, Gu Y, Chen C, et al. Diagnostic value of pro-gastrin-releasing peptide for small cell lung canc- er:a meta-analysis[J]. Clin Chem Lab Med, 2011,49 (6) : 1039-1046.
  • 10Hye-Ran K, In-Jae O, Myung-Geun S,et al. Plasma proGRP concentration is sensitive and specific for dis- criminating small cell lung cancer from nonmalignant conditions or non-small cell lung cancer[J]. J Korean Med Sci,2011,26(5) :625-630.

引证文献4

二级引证文献28

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部