摘要
通过对EPR和CPR1000的防火设计进行比较,并对主要差异进行分析归纳,显示EPR在设计安全原则、防爆和人员保护方面规定的更加详细,在设计过程中对防火分区方法、薄弱环节分析和耐火极限的认定方法方面的改进都同CPR1000中的分析方法有很大的不同。EPR防火设计目前还在进行不断地变更,可以对其资料进行跟踪收集。
By comparing the fire protection designs of EPR and CPR1000, and conducting analysis and summarization to their main differences, it is shown that EPR is more detailed in terms of design safety principle, explosion protection and personnel protection, which differs greatly in the improvement of fire area division method, weakness analysis and fire resistance determination method from the analysis method adopted by CPR1000 nuclear power plants. In addition, fire protection design of EPR is still being updated, and it is necessary to trace and collect the design changes in the future.
出处
《发电设备》
2013年第6期396-400,共5页
Power Equipment
关键词
核电厂
防火设计
差异分析
nuclear power plant
fire protection design
difference analysis
