期刊文献+

随钻脉冲中子—伽马密度测井响应数值模拟 被引量:6

Numerical Simulation on Pulsed Neutron-Gamma Ray Density Logging Response in Logging while Drilling
原文传递
导出
摘要 随钻过程中采用D-T可控中子源和2个NaI晶体探测器系统,记录两个探测器的非弹性散射和俘获伽马射线,采用俘获伽马计数比值进行含氢指数校正后,建立非弹性散射伽马计数比和地层密度的响应关系,从而实现脉冲中子-伽马密度测井.利用蒙特卡罗方法模拟地层条件下非弹性散射和俘获伽马分布,得到非弹伽马计数与地层密度和含氢指数都有关,但近、远探测器俘获伽马计数比反映含氢指数灵敏度高,利用其对含氢指数校正后就可以得到非弹伽马计数与地层密度的关系;通过二元回归方法得出地层密度校正后的响应公式,校正后视密度和真密度值相差很小.研究结果表明,在随钻过程中利用脉冲中子伽马测井方法可以确定地层密度. The inelastic and capture gamma ray at different spacing can be recorded with the system of D-T pulsed neutron source and two NaI crystal detectors.The response of inelastic gamma ray counting ratio from near and far detectors and formation density can be obtained after hydrogen index was corrected by the capture gamma ray counts ratio.As a result,the formation density can be measured with pulsed neutron-gamma logging method.The distributions of inelastic and capture gamma ray under different formation conditions are simulated using Monte Carlo method,and then the inelastic gamma ray counting is related to formation density and hydrogen index.Owing to the higher sensitivity of capture gamma ray reflecting to hydrogen index than inelastic gamma ray,the response of formation density and the inelastic gamma ray counting ratio from near and far detectors is founded,which hydrogen index is corrected by capture gamma ray counting.In addition,the binary regression method is utilized to get the density response formula,with which the apparent density after correction is very close to the real one.It is concluded that the formation density can be determined by pulsed neutron gamma logging method while drilling.
出处 《地球科学(中国地质大学学报)》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2013年第5期1116-1120,共5页 Earth Science-Journal of China University of Geosciences
基金 国家自然科学基金(No.40784065) 国家重大油气专项(Nos.2011ZX0520-002 2011ZX05009-003) 山东省自然科学基金(NoZR2012DM002) 中石油创新基金(No.2012D-5006-0302) 中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金(No.10CX03001A)
关键词 随钻测井 脉冲中子 伽马射线 地层密度 蒙特卡罗模拟 数值模拟 logging while drilling pulsed neutron gamma rays formation density Monte Carlo simulation numerical simulation.
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1Quirein, J. A., Smith, H., Chen, D. D., et al., 2005. Formation Density Prediction Using Pulsed Neutron Capture Tools. SPWLA Annual Logging Symposium, USA.
  • 2Aitken, J. D., Adolph, R., Evans, M., et al., 2002. Radiation Sources in Drilling Tools:Comprehensive Risk Analysis in the Design, Development and Operation of LWD Tools.SPE International Conference on Health, Safety and Environment in Oil and Gas Exploration and Pro- duction, Malaysia.
  • 3Huang, L. J., 1985. Radioactivity Logging Theory. Petroleum Industry Press, Beij ing (in Chinese).
  • 4Mirto, E., Weller, G., E1-Halawani, T., et al., 2006. New De- velopments in Sourceless Logging-While-Drilling For- mation Evaluation. A Case Study From Southern Italy. SPE EUROPEC/EAGE Annual Conference and Exhibi- tion, Austria.
  • 5Odom,R.C., Bailey, S. M., Wilson, R. D., et al., 1999. Pulsed Neutron Density Measurements : Modeling the Depth of Investigation and Cased-Hole Wellbore Uncertainties. SPWLA Annual Logging Symposium, USA.
  • 6Jacobson, L., Durbin, D., Reed, S., et al., 2004. An ImprovedFormation Density Measurement Using PNC Tools. SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Houston.
  • 7Briesmeister, J. F., 2000. MCNpXM-A General Monte Carlo N-Particle Transport Code. Los Alamos National Labo- ratory Press,Los Alamos.
  • 8Odom, R.C., Tiller, D. E., Wilson, R. D., et al., 2000. Improve- ments in a Through-Casing Pulsed-Neutron Density Log.SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Louisiana.
  • 9Weller,G., Galvin, S., EI-Halawani, T., et al., 2005. A New Integrated LWD Platform Delivers Improved Drilling Efficiency, Well Placement, and Formation Evaluation Services.Offshore Europe,United Kingdom.
  • 10Committee on Radiation Source and Replacement, 2008. Na- tional Research Council. National Academies Press, Washington D.C..

二级参考文献62

共引文献15

同被引文献49

引证文献6

二级引证文献19

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部