期刊文献+

术前良恶性甲状腺结节鉴别诊断评分系统的建立及验证 被引量:9

The derivation and validation of a prediction rule for differential diagnosis of thyroid nodules
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的建立术前良恶性甲状腺结节鉴别诊断评分系统,并评价其临床价值。方法以1997年6月—2012年7月在上海长征医院行甲状腺结节手术患者为研究对象,通过查阅病历获取其临床信息。随机抽取2/3研究对象作为建模人群,其余作为验证人群。采用多元logistic回归分析方法建立恶性结节术前诊断预测模型。根据模型中各变量的B值赋予分值,建立良恶性结节鉴别诊断评分系统。通过预测一致性、良恶性区分能力和诊断准确度评价评分系统的临床价值。结果共纳入13980例患者(建模人群9195例,验证人群4785例)。评分系统由性别、发热、颈部疼痛、颈部包块、心悸盗汗、结节数量、结节位置、回声性质、结节边界、颈部淋巴结、结节最大径、促甲状腺素(TSH)、游离T,(FT,)、甲状腺过氧化物酶抗体(TPOAb)、甲状腺球蛋白抗体(TgAb)、甲状腺球蛋白(Tg)、降钙素、癌胚抗原(CEA)组成,其预测的一致性好(P=0.437),良恶性区分能力强(受试者工作特征曲线下面积为0.928),诊断准确度高(以63.5分作为诊断界值,其敏感度、特异度、准确率、阳性预测值、阴性预测值、阳性似然比、阴性似然比分别为89.3%、81.5%、83.2%、56.8%、96.6%、4.83和0.13)。评分系统在验证人群中的鉴别诊断效能与建模人群中的结果相似。结论所建立的术前良恶性甲状腺结节鉴别诊断评分系统具有良好的诊断效能,可以在术前较为准确地预测甲状腺结节的良恶性质。 Objective To set up a prediction rule for the pro-operative differential diagnosis of thyroid nodules and evaluate its clinical value. Methods All patients of thyroid nodules underwent thyroid operations in Changzheng hospital from June, 1997 to July, 2012 were included in this study. They were randomly divided into the derivation cohort (2/3) and the validation cohort (1/3). A prediction rule was developed based on the logistic regression model and the scoring system was established in accordance with assigning of the value of each variable 13 in the model. The prediction consistency, discriminatory power and diagnostic accuracy were conducted to evaluate the clinical value of the scoring system. Results A total of 13 980 patients were enrolled in the study with 9195 in the derivation cohort and 4785 in the validation cohort. The prediction rule consisted of 18 variables, which were gender, clinical manifestations including fever, neck sore, neck mass, palpitation and sweating, serum level of thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) , free triiodothyronine ( FT3 ) , thyroid peroxidase antibody ( TPOAb ) , thyroglobulin antibody ( TgAb ) , thyroglobulin(Tg), calcitonin and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), uhrasonography features including nodules number, location, size, boundaries and ethological patterns and the presence and patterns of lymph nodes. The model showed good calibration consistency ( P = 0. 437 ) and discrimination power ( area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0. 928 ) in the derivation cohort. The sensitivity, specificity,accuracy, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, positive likelihood ratio and negative likelihood ratio of the model were 89. 3%, 81.5%, 83.2%, 56. 8%, 96. 6%, 4. 83 and 0.13, respectively. Conclusion The prediction rule and its scoring system established in the study are efficacious for the calibration and discrimination of thyroid nodules in Chinese population, which could be a useful tool for the pro-operative risk stratification.
出处 《中华内科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2013年第11期945-950,共6页 Chinese Journal of Internal Medicine
关键词 甲状腺结节 诊断 鉴别 LOGISTIC模型 危险分层 Thyroid nodule Diagnosis, differential Logistic model Risk stratification
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1Cai QC,Yu ED,Xiao Y,et al.Derivation and validation of a prediction rule for estimating advanced colorectal neoplasm risk in average-risk Chinese.Am J Epidemiol,2012,175:584-593.
  • 2Hosmer DW Jr,Lemeshow S.Applied logistic regression.2nd ed.New York:John Willey & Sons,2000.
  • 3Moons KG,Harrell FE,Steyerberg EW.Should scoring rules be based on odds ratios or regression coefficients?.J Clin Epidemiol,2002,55:1054-1055.
  • 4Hanley JA,McNeil BJ.The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.Radiology,1982,143:29-36.
  • 5Shimura H,Haraguchi K,Hiejima Y,et al.Distinct diagnostic criteria for ultrasonographic examination of papillary thyroid carcinoma:a multicenter study.Thyroid,2005,15:251-258.
  • 6刘增波,方平,谭跃萍,宋维,蔡丽萍,袁志忠,周长林.彩色多普勒超声对甲状腺恶性肿瘤鉴别的多因素分析[J].中华超声影像学杂志,2005,14(2):158-159. 被引量:19

二级参考文献4

共引文献18

同被引文献149

  • 1邹宝波,程科萍,何琅,刘金满,王健,陈炳为,邱海波,沈其君.外科患者手术后切口感染危险因素的logistic回归分析[J].现代医学,2005,33(2):98-100. 被引量:32
  • 2钱碧云,何敏,董淑芬,王继芳,陈可欣.1981年至2001年天津市甲状腺癌的发病率和死亡率[J].中华内分泌代谢杂志,2005,21(5):432-434. 被引量:46
  • 3单忠艳,关海霞.甲状腺癌相关研究进展[J].中国实用内科杂志,2007,27(1):33-36. 被引量:24
  • 4孙燕,周际昌.临床肿瘤内科手册[M].4版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2003:568-569.
  • 5中华医学会内分泌学分会,中华医学会外科学分会内分泌学组,中国抗癌协会头颈肿瘤专业委员会,等.甲状腺结节和分化型甲状腺癌诊治指南[J].中华内分泌代谢杂志,2012,28:779-797.
  • 6NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. Thyroid carcinoma. Versiort2. 2012[ S/OL]. (2012-05-21) [2013-07-29 ]. http ://www. endocrinologia, org. mx/descargas/guias _ endos! Ca% 20tiroides% 20NCCN% 202012. pdf.
  • 7Pellegriti G, Frasca F, Regalbuto C, et al. Worldwide increasing incidence of thyroid cancer: update on epidemiology and risk factors [ J ]. J Cancer Epidemio1,2013 ,2013 :965212.
  • 8Cerfolio RJ, Bryant AS, Scott E, et al. Women with pathologic stage I,II,and III non-small eel1 lung cancer have better survival than men [J]. Chest,2006,130 : 1796-1802.
  • 9Ricarte-Filho J, Ganly I, Rivera M, et al. Papillary thyroid carcinomas with cervical lymph node metastases can be stratified into clinically relevant prognostic categories using oncogenic BRAF, the number of nodal metastases, and extra-nodal extension [ J ]. Thyroid ,2012,22:575-584.
  • 10Brito JP, Yarur A J, Prokop LJ, et al. Prevalence of thyroid cancer in muhinodular goiter versus single nodule: a systematic review and meta-analysis[ J]. Thyroid,2013,23:449-455.

引证文献9

二级引证文献72

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部