期刊文献+

新型股骨远端前外侧入路治疗股骨远端骨折疗效观察 被引量:8

NEW ANTEROLATERAL APPROACH OF DISTAL FEMUR FOR TREATMENT OF DISTAL FEMORAL FRACTURES
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的与常规入路比较,探讨新型股骨远端前外侧入路治疗股骨远端骨折的疗效。方法2007年7月-2009年12月,58例接受切开复位内固定术且符合选择标准的股骨远端骨折患者纳入研究。其中28例采用新型股骨远端前外侧入路,沿大腿外侧弧形向前、向上至股四头肌扩张部,延伸至髌骨外侧达胫骨结节作切口(新型入路组),30例采用常规股骨远端外侧或前外侧入路(常规入路组)。两组患者性别、年龄、致伤原因、侧别、骨折类型、合并症、受伤至手术时间及术前处理方法比较,差异均无统计学意义(P〉0.05),具有可比性。记录两组患者手术时间、术中出血量、术中透视次数、住院时间及膝关节功能美国特种外科医院(HSS)评分。结果两组患者均顺利完成手术,术中无血管、神经损伤发生;术后切口均Ⅰ期愈合。新型入路组手术时间、术中透视次数显著少于常规入路组,差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05);两组术中出血量及住院时间比较,差异均无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。患者均获随访,随访时间12~36个月,平均19.8个月。X线片复查示,两组患者骨折均愈合,新型入路组骨折愈合时间为(12.62±2.34)周,常规入路组为(13.78±1.94)周,比较差异无统计学意义(t=2.78,P=0.10)。末次随访时,新型入路组膝关节HSS评分为(94.4±4.2)分,显著优于常规入路组(89.2±6.0)分(t=3.85,P=0.00)。结论与常规入路比较,采用新型股骨远端前外侧入路行切开复位内固定术中治疗股骨远端骨折,对软组织损伤小,骨折显露更充分,允许膝关节术后早期功能锻炼,促进膝关节功能恢复。 Objective To assess the effectiveness of the new anterolateral approach of the distal femur for the treatment of distal femoral fractures. Methods Between July 2007 and December 2009, 58 patients with distal femoral fractures were treated by new anterolateral approach of the distal femur in 28 patients (new approach group) and by conventional approach in 30 patients (conventional approach group). There was no significant difference in gender, age, cause of injury, affected side, type of fracture, disease duration, complication, or preoperative intervention (P 〉 0.05). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, intraoperative fluoroscopy frequency, hospitalization days, and Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) score of knee were recorded. Results Operation was successfully completed in all patients of 2 groups, and healing of incision by first intention was obtained; no vascular and nerves injuries occurred. The operation time and intraoperative fluoroscopy frequency of new approach group were significantly less than those of conventional approach group (P 〈 0.05). But the intraoperative blood loss and the hospitalization days showed no significant difference between 2 groups (P 〉 0.05). All patients were followed up 12-36 months (mean, 19.8 months). Bone union was shown on X-ray films; the fracture healing time was (12.62 + 2.34) weeks in the new approach group and was (13.78± 1.94) weeks in the conventional approach group, showing no significant difference (t=2.78, P=0.10). The knee HSS score at last follow-up was 94.4 ± 4.2 in the new approach group, and was 89.2 ± 6.0 in the conventional approach group, showing significant difference between 2 groups (t=3.85, P=0.00). Conclusion New anterolateral approach of the distal femur for distal femoral fractures has the advantages of exposure plenitude, minimal tissue trauma, and early function rehabilitation training so as to enhance the function recovery of knee joint.
出处 《中国修复重建外科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2013年第11期1296-1299,共4页 Chinese Journal of Reparative and Reconstructive Surgery
关键词 股骨远端骨折 新型股骨远端前外侧入路 手术入路 切开复位内固定术 Distal femoral fracture New anterolateral approach of distal femur Surgical approach Open reduction and internal fixation
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1陈亮清,白龙,蔡祖祥,谢振宇.闭合复位逆行交锁髓内钉治疗股骨远端骨折[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2007,22(5):377-379. 被引量:14
  • 2#NAME?tinet O, Cordey J, Harder Y, et al. The epidemiology of fractures ofthe distal femur. Injury, 2000,31 Suppl 3: C62-C63.
  • 3Gulabi D, Erdem M, Bulut G, et al. The outcome and complicationsof the locked plating management for the peri prosthetic distal femurfractures after a total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Surg, 2013, 5(2):124-128.
  • 4Schatzker J. Fractures of the distal femur revisited. Clin Orthop RelatRes, 1998, (347): 43-56.
  • 5Insall JN,Ranawat CS, Aglietti P, et al. A comparison of four modelsof total knee replacement prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg (Am), 1976,58(6): 754-765.
  • 6Harris B, Owen JR, Wayne JS, et al. Does femoral component loosen-ing poredispose to femoral fracture?: an in vitro comparison of ce-mented hips. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2010,468(2): 497-503.
  • 7Kijowski R, Gold GE. Routine 3D magnetic resonance imaging ofjoints. J Magn Reson Imaging, 2011, 33(4): 758-771.
  • 8Sher I,Umans H, Downie SA, et al. Proximal iliotibial band syndrome:what is it and where is it? Skeletal Radiol, 2011,40(12): 1553-1556.
  • 9Whiteside LA. Selective ligament release in total knee arthroplasty ofthe knee in valgus. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 1999,(367): 130-140.
  • 10Kanamiya T, Whiteside LA, Nakamura T, et al. Effect of selective later-al ligament release on stability in knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop RelatRes, 2002, (404):24-31.

二级参考文献36

  • 1江海平.逆行交锁髓内钉治疗股骨远端骨折[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2005,20(1):56-57. 被引量:27
  • 2孙林,刘兴华,王雪松,吴宏华,龚晓峰,安贵生,武勇,王满宜.带锁髓内钉治疗新鲜四肢长骨干骨折1224例疗效分析[J].中华骨科杂志,2005,25(3):129-135. 被引量:160
  • 3Ostendorf M,van Stel HF,Buskens E,et al.Patient-reported outcome in total hip replacement:a comparison of five instruments of health status.J Bone Joint Surg Br.2004;86:801-802.
  • 4Lipscomb J,Gotay CC,Snyder CF.Patient-reported outcomes in cancer:a review of recent research and policy initiatives.CA Cancer J Clin.2007;57:278-300.
  • 5Ribeiro B.Patient-reported outcome measures.J R Soc Med.2007;100:397.
  • 6Lysholm J,Gillquist J.Evaluation of knee ligament surgery results witll special emphasis on use of a scoring scale.Am J Sports Med.1982;10:150-154.
  • 7Knutsen G,Engebretsen L,Ludvigsen TC,et al.Autologous chondrocyte implantation compared with microfracture in the knee.J Bone Joint Surg Am.2004;86:455-464.
  • 8Briggs KK,Kocher MS,Rodkey WG,et al.Reliability,validity,and responsiveness of the Lysholm knee score and Tegner activity scale for patients with meniscal injury of the knee.J Bone Joint Surg Am.2006;88(4):698-705.
  • 9Smith HJ,Richardson JB,Tennant A.Modification and validation of the Lysholm Knee Scale to assess articular cartilage damage.Osteoarthdtis Cartilage.2009;17(1):53-58.
  • 10Marx RG,Jones EC,Allen AA,et al.Reliability,validity and responsiveness of four knee outcome scales for athletic patients.JBJS Am.2001;83:1459-1469.

共引文献106

同被引文献60

  • 1牛维,刘海全.锁定加压钢板在胫腓骨骨折中的初步应用[J].中医正骨,2005,17(7):29-30. 被引量:9
  • 2Ng AC, Drake MT, Clarke BL, et al. Trends in subtrochanteric, diaphyseal, and distal femur fractures, 1984-2007. Osteoporos Int, 2012, 23(6): 1721-1726.
  • 3Kim), Kang SB, Nam K, et al. Retrograde intramedullary nailing for distal femur fracture with osteoporosis. Clin Orthop Surg, 2012, 4(4): 307-312.
  • 4胥少汀,葛宝丰,徐印坎.实用骨科学.4版.北京:人民军医出版社,2012:984—985.
  • 5Johnson KD, Hicken G. Distal femoral fractures. Orthop Clin North Am, 1987, 18(1): 115-132.
  • 6Rademakers MV, Kerkhoffs GM, Sierevelt IN, et al. Intra-articular fractures of the distal femur: a long-term follow-up study of surgically treated patients.) Orthop Trauma, 2004,18(4): 213-219.
  • 7Johnson EE. Combined direct and indirect reduction of comminuted four-part intraarticular T -type fractures of the distal femur. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 1988, (231): 154-162.
  • 8Bolhofner BR, Carmen B, Clifford P. The results of open reduction and internal fixation of distal femur fractures using a biologic (indirect) reduction technique. J Orthop Trauma, 1996, 10(6): 372-377.
  • 9Ostrum RF, Geel C. Indirect reduction and internal fixation of supracondylar femur fractures without bone graft. I Orthop Trauma, 1995, 9( 4): 278-284.
  • 10Henderson CE, Kuhl LL, Fitzpatrick DC, et al. Locking plates for distal femur fractures: is there a problem with fracture heal ing? I Orthop Trauma, 2011, 25 Suppl 1: S8-S 14.

引证文献8

二级引证文献61

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部