期刊文献+

MMP-3基因多态性对冠状动脉介入术后再狭窄的影响 被引量:2

Effects of MMP-3 Gene Polymorphism in Restenosis after Percutaneous Coronary Interventions
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨基质金属蛋白酶-3(MMP-3)启动子区域5A/6A基因多态性是否参与了经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)术后再狭窄发生发展过程。方法入选行PCI治疗术后复查的冠状动脉造影患者437例。收集患者复查冠状动脉造影前、后临床资料及造影结果,并留取血标本进行血清MMP-3含量以及基因多态性分析。根据MMP-3基因表型不同,分为突变组(5A/5A+5A/6A,n=136)和野生组(6A/6A,n=301)。比较2组相关资料,分析基因多态性与再狭窄的关系。结果 2组再狭窄率差异无统计学意义(42.2%vs 33.1%,P>0.05)。与突变组比较,野生组再狭窄程度([56.28±11.10)%vs(36.00±10.17)%]较高(P<0.01);2组血清MMP-3含量([13.38±3.00)μg/L v(s12.33±2.96)μg/L]差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。携带6A等位基因患者再狭窄率要高于携带5A等位基因患者(P<0.05)。携带野生基因型是PCI术后再狭窄的危险因素。结论携带6A等位基因患者再狭窄风险性明显高于携带5A等位基因患者。 Objective To investigate the relationship between matrix metalloproteinase-3 (MMP-3) gene promoter polymorphisms 5A/6A and the restenosis after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Methods A total of 437 patients with PCI were selected in this study. Patients were divided into mutant genotype group (5A/5A±SA/6A, n=136) and wild genotype group (6A/6A, n=301) according to MMP-3 polymorphism. The angiography and clinic data were collected before and after coronary angiography in two groups of patients. The serum level MMP-3 and genotype analysis were compared be- tween two groups. Results There was no significant difference in the restenosis rate between two groups (42.2% vs 33.1%, P 〉 0.05). The restenosis degree was significantly higher in wild genotype group than that in mutant genotype group (56.28%± 11.10% vs 36.00%± 10.17%, P 〈 0.01). There was no significant difference in the serum level of MMP-3 between two groups (13.38μg/L ±3.00 μg/L vs 12.33 μg/L_±2196 μg/L, P 〉 0.05). There was a higher restenosis rate in patients carrying 6A al- lele than that of patients canting 5A allele (P 〈 0.05). Canting wild genotypes are risk factors for restenosis after PCI. Conclusion Patients carrying 6A allele have significantly higher risk of resteonsis than patients carrying 5A allele.
出处 《天津医药》 CAS 北大核心 2013年第11期1063-1066,共4页 Tianjin Medical Journal
关键词 基质金属蛋白酶3 多态现象 遗传 血管成形术 经腔 经皮冠状动脉 冠状动脉再狭窄 matrix metalloproteinase 3 polymorphism, genetic angioplasty, transluminal, percutaneous coronary coronary restenosis
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1Henniller JB, Nikolsky E, Lansky Aj.et al. Clinical and angiograph?ic outcomes of elderly patients treated with everolimus-eluting ver- sus paclitaxel-eluting stents: three-year results from the SPIRIT ill randomised trial[J]. EuroIntervention, 2011,7(3):307-311.
  • 2Backes A, Seay U, Sedding DG, et al. Inhibition of matrix deposi?tion: a new strategy for prevention of restenosis after balloon angio?plasty[J]. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol, 2010,55(2): 213-218.
  • 3Munhoz FB, Godoy-Santos AL, Santos MC. MMP- 3 polymorphism: Genetic marker in pathological processes (Review)[J]. Mol Med Re?port, 2010, 3(5): 735-740.
  • 4Osherov AB, Gotha L, Cheema AN,et al. Proteins mediating colla?gen biosynthesis and accumulation in arterial repair: novel targets for anti-restenosis therapy[J]. Cardiovasc Res, 2011,91(1):16-26.
  • 5Mori S, Gibson G, McTiernan CF. Differential expression of MMPs and TIMPs in moderate and severe heart failure in a transgenic mod?el[J]. J Card Fail, 2006,12(4):314-325.
  • 6Ghaderian SM, Akbarzadeh Najar R, Tabatabaei Panah AS. Genetic polymorph isms and plasma levels of matrix metalloproteinases and their relationships with developing acute myocardial infarction[J]. Coron Artery Dis, 2010,21(6):330-335.
  • 7Humphries S, Bauters C, Meirhaeghe A,et al. The 5A6A polymor?phism in the promoter of the stromelysin-l (MMP3) gene as a risk factor for restenosis[J]. Eur Heart J,2002,23(9):721-725.
  • 8Ragino YI, Chernjavski AM, Polonskaja YV,et al. Blood levels of in?flammatory and destructive biomarkers in coronary atherosclerosis of different severity[J]. Bull Exp BioI Med,2010,149(5):587-590.

同被引文献22

  • 1Lee JY, Park DW, Kim YH, et al. Incidence, predictors, treatment, and long - term prognosis of patients with restenosis after drug- eluting stent implantation for unprotected left main coronary artery disease [J]. J Am Coll Cardio, 2011, 22, 57 (12) : 1349 -1358.
  • 2Kang SJ, Mintz GS, Park DW, et al. Mechanisms of in - stent restenosis after drug - elut ing stent implantation intravascular ultrasound analysis [J]. Circ Cardiovasc Interv, 2011, 4 (1) : 9 - 14.
  • 3Wang LF, Tao LW, Huang MX, et al. Clinical Evaluation of Coronary In - Stent Restenosis Using Dual - Source Computed Tomography [ J]. Eehoeardiography, 2015, 32 (11): 1681 - 1687.
  • 4Magalhaes MA, Minha S, Chen F, et al. Response to letter regarding article," clinical presentation and outcomes of coronary in - stent restenosis across 3 - stent generations" [J]. Circ Cardiovasc Interv, 2015, 8 (4): 2459.
  • 5Marino BC, Nascimento GA, Rabelo W, et al. Clinical Coronary In - Stent Restenosis Follow - Up after Treatment and Analyses of ClinicalOutcomes [J]. Arq Bras Cardiol, 2015, 104 (5): 375-386.
  • 6Maeng M, Baranauskas A, Christiansen EH, et al. A 10 - month angiographic and 4 - year clinical outcome of everolimus - e|uting Versus sirolimus - eluting coronarystents in patients with diabetes mellitus (the DiabeDES IV randomized angiography trial ) [ J ]. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2015. 86 (77 .. 1161 -1167.
  • 7Pomerantses EV, Juergens CP, Gerekens U, et al. Angio~aphic preditor ofrestenosis after optimal coronary stent placement [ J ]. Circulation, 1995', 96 (11) : 471 -473.
  • 8Kobayashi Y, De Gregone J, Reimers B, et al. The length of the stented segment is an independent predictor of restenosis [ J]. J Am Coil Cardiol, 1998, 34 (7): 651-659.
  • 9Hoffmann R, Herrmann G, Siber S, et al. Randomized comparison of success and adverse event rates and cost effectiveness of one long versus two short stents for treatment of long coronary narrowings [ J ]. Am J Cardiol, 2002, 90 ( 11 ) : 460 - 464.
  • 10农一兵,林谦,吴旸,崔晓云,王轩,郭自强,廖家桢.凉血生肌中药对冠状动脉介入术后再狭窄及心血管事件的干预作用[J].中华中医药杂志,2008,23(2):161-164. 被引量:24

引证文献2

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部