期刊文献+

儿童屈光不正及近视的视力筛查标准 被引量:8

Cutoff point of visual acuity to screen refractive error or myopia in Chinese children
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 探讨快速筛查儿童屈光不正及近视的视力标准.方法 横断面调查研究.使用2002年10月至2003年1月中山大学中山眼科中心对广州市荔湾区进行的屈光不止研究(RESC)数据,检查包含裸眼视力(ETDRS视力表)、散瞳下自动电脑验光(ARK-30;Nidek Corp.)及眼部健康检查.屈光不正定义为SE≤-0.50 D、SE≥+2.00 D或散光≤-1.00 D;近视定义为:等效球镜度(SE)≤-0.50 D、或SE≤-0.75 D、或SE≤-1.00 D;统计灵敏度、特异度、阳性和阴性预测值,并作ROC曲线图.结果 共统计3 715名7~15岁儿童数据.屈光不正ROC曲线图显示灵敏度,特异度都相对高的视力为0.625,其灵敏度、特异度、阳性和阴性预测值分别为71.7%、93.3%、92.9%和72.9%.近视ROC曲线图显示灵敏度、特异度都相对高的视力为0.5.等效球镜度≤-0.50、-0.75或-1.00 D的灵敏度分别为66.3%、73.5%和80.7%,特异度分别为94.3%、94.0%和93.5%,阳性预测值分别为89.7%、88.0%和86.3%,阴性预测值分别为78.9%、85.4%和90.5%.结论 对于7~15岁儿童,0.625为筛查屈光不正的视力截点,0.5为筛查高于-1.00D近视的视力截点. Objective To determine the cutoff point of visual acuity to screen refractive error or myopia in children. Methods This was a cross-sectional research. The database of the RESC (Refractive Error Study in Children) were used which were collected from October 2002 to January 2003. The examination included visual acuity measurement (ETDRs visual acuity chart), auto refraction (ARK-30; Nidek Corp.) and ocular health examination. The definition of refractive error was SE~〈-0.50 D, SE~〉+2.00 D or cylinder power ~〈-1.00 D. The sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values were calculated using each patient as a case; a receiver operator curve was plotted. Myopia was defined as: spherical equivalent (SE)〈^-0.50 D or SE〈^-0.75 D or SE~〈-I.00 D. Results The data of 3 715 cases 7-15 years old subjects' were analyzed. A satisfactory sensitivity/specificity profile was obtained which show 0.625 was the cutoff point for refractive error. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values were 71.7%, 93.3%, 92.9%, 72.9%, respectively. And 0.5 was the best cutoff point under three different myopia definitions. The sensitivity for SE~〈-0.50 D, -0.75 D or -1.00 D were 66.3%, 73.5%, 80.7%, respectively. The specificity were 94.3%, 94.0% and 93.5%, respectively. The positive predictive values were 89.7%, 88.0% and 86.3%, and the negative predictive values were 78.9%, 85.4%, 90.5%. Conclusion 0.625 is advised to screen refractive error, while 0.5 is advised to screen potential myopia subjects who aged 7 to 15.
出处 《中华眼视光学与视觉科学杂志》 CAS 2013年第10期587-592,共6页 Chinese Journal Of Optometry Ophthalmology And Visual Science
基金 眼科学国家重点实验室"青年基金"项目(2011Q07) 国家科技支撑计划项目(2012BHI08B02)
关键词 视力筛查 屈光不正 近视 儿童 Vision screening Refractive Error Myopia Children
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献12

  • 1[2]Fen-is FL 3rd,Bailey I.Standardizing the measurement of visual acuity for clinical research studies:Guidelines from the Eye Care Technology Forum.Ophthalmology,1996;103(1):181-182.
  • 2[3]Arditi A,Cagenello R.On the statistical reliability of letter-chart visual acuity measurements.Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci,1993;34(1):120-129.
  • 3[4]Reeves BC,Wood JM,Hill AR.Reliability of high-and low-cantrast letter charts.Ophthalmic Physiol Opt,1993 ;13(1):17-26.
  • 4[5]Dandona R,Dandona L,Srinivas M,et al.Refractive error in children in a rural population in India.Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci,2002 ; 43 (3):615-622.
  • 5[6]Bland JM,Altman DG.Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.Lancet,1986; 1 (8476):307-310.
  • 6[7]Lovie-Kitehin JE.Validity and reliability of visual acuity measurements.Ophthalmic Physiol Opt,1988;8(4):363-370.
  • 7[8]Manny RE,Hussein M,Gwiazda J,et al.Repeatability of ETDRS visual acuity in children.Invest Ophthalmol Via Sci,2003;44(8):3294-3300.
  • 8[9]Elliott DB,Sheridan M.The use of accurate visual acuity measurements in clinical anti-cataract formulation trials.Ophthalmic Physiol Opt,1988;8(4):397-401.
  • 9[10]Kheterpal S,Jones HS,Auld R,et al.Reliability of visual acuity in children with reduced vision.Ophthalmic Physiol Opt,1996 ; 16 (5):447 -449.
  • 10[11]施明光,主编.临床视觉光学.浙江:浙江大学出版社,1995:14-17.

共引文献221

同被引文献167

引证文献8

二级引证文献44

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部