期刊文献+

公正的主观性:“社会人”的公正判断 被引量:2

The Subjectivity of Justice:Justice Judgment of “Homo Sociologicus”
下载PDF
导出
摘要 公正并非一种客观存在,而是基于"有限理性"判断产生的主观感受。在对事件做出公正判断时,个体并不全然参照社会标准,往往受诸多主观因素的影响。社会公正的主观判断强调判断过程中的主观维度,关注公正的主观性,更接近真实的判断模式。本文结合已有研究,总结影响公正判断的主观因素,分析"非理性"的公正判断对情绪及行为的影响,最后对公正判断的未来研究做出总结与展望,旨在为此课题的深入探究提供新的研究思路。 but is the Justice is not a kind of objective existence, subjective judgment and feelings based on the bounded rationality. When making a justice judg- ment about an event, the individual would be not com- pletely in line with the social standard, and often be influenced by many subiective factnr~ 1,1 v; ,,~ ~ho^the subject of social justice ciologicus" rather than the judgment is the "homo so- "homo economicus", it is much closer to the real model of judgment when the research focused on the "irrational" of justice judg- ment. Combined with the existing studies, this essay summarized the subjective factors in justice judgment,and underlined the effects of justice judgment on be- havior. The integration of cross-curricular interests is called for in the future. The studies of this title can pay attention to some new orientations.
作者 葛茜 蒋京川
出处 《社会心理科学》 2013年第8期19-21,52,共4页 Science of Social Psychology
关键词 公正 公正判断 主观因素 非理性 justice justice judgment subjective factors irrationality
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1胡金生,叶春,李旭,高婷婷.公正判断中的“非理性”:加工特征、主要表现和影响因素.心理科学进展,2005,18(4),623-629.
  • 2Oosterbeek, Hessel, Randolph Sloof and Gijs van de Kuilen (2004). Cultural Differences in Ultima- tum Game Experiments: Evidence from a Meta-Analysis. Experimental Economics, 7, 171 - 188.
  • 3Schmitt, M., Baumert, A., Gollwitzer, M., & Maes, J. (2010). The justice sensitivity inventory: Factorial validity, location in the personality facet space, demographic pattern, and normative data. So- cial Justice Research, 23, 211-238.
  • 4Baumert, A., & Schmitt, M. (2009). Jus- tice-sensitive interpretations of ambiguous situations. Australian Journal of Psychology, 61 (1), 6 - 12.
  • 5Gollwitzer, M., Maes, J. & Baer, A. (2005). Asymmetrical effects of justice sensitivity perspectives on pro-social and antisocial behavior. Social Justice Research, 18, 183-201.
  • 6Hafer C. L, Begue L., Choma B. L., et al. (2005).Belief in a just world and commitment to long-term deserved outcomes. Social Justice Re- search, 18(4): 429-444.
  • 7Graham, C., & Felton, A. (2006). Inequality and happiness: Insights from Latin America. Journal of Economic Inequality, 4,107-122.
  • 8吴胜涛,王力,周明洁,王文忠,张建新.灾区民众的公正观与幸福感及其与非灾区的比较[J].心理科学进展,2009,17(3):579-587. 被引量:40
  • 9Sanfey, A. G., R.illing, J. K., Aronson J A , Nystrom L E, Cohen J D (2003). The neural basis of economic decision-making in the Ultimatum Game. Science, 300,1755-1758.
  • 10Singer T, Seymour B, O'Doherty J P, Stephan K E, Dolan R J, Frith C D (2006). Empathic neural responses are modulated by the perceived fair- ness of others. Nature,439:466-469.

二级参考文献11

共引文献39

同被引文献9

引证文献2

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部