摘要
目的:了解男同性恋者性角色与性别角色之间的区别。方法:采取定性研究中的滚雪球式个案访谈与参与观察。结果:通常认为同性恋者的性角色有"攻"和"受"之分,然而性角色并不总是与性别角色相一致,女性气质的男同性恋者在性行为中可能扮演主动的角色,反之亦然。性别角色与性角色之间无法相互推断。性角色和性别角色部分源于生理性别与社会性别之间的划分,但性角色并不是完全由生理因素决定,攻、受行为并没有完全结构化。结论:男同性恋社群中"受"的角色占多数,这与长期的历史-社会塑造、文化心态有关。通过性别角色规范作为中介,文化对同性恋社群性行为的作用得以实现,从中亦可以发现社会/文化是如何建构行为的。
Objectives: To identity the difference between sexual role and gender role. Method: Based on snowball sam- piing and participative observation. Results: The sexual role division in gay male is "to attack" (1) and "accepted" (0). The gender role in gay relationship is like male role and female role in the heterosexual discourses; however, sexual role of gay male is not always consistent with the gender role, feminine gay male would actually play the role of an attack, which is the positive role in sex activity, vice versa. Accordingly, gender role and sexual role cant deduce with each other. The role dislocation and role taxonomy is a result of social construction. Sexual role was not totally decided by the physical factor. In other words, roles of "to attack" and "accepted" was not structured. Conclusion: a majority of gay male play passive role in the homosexual behav- ior, this phenomenon is related to the historical -social and cultural personality. Culture affects sexual role through gender role, from which it can be told that how society/culture constructs behavior.
出处
《中国性科学》
2013年第10期102-107,共6页
Chinese Journal of Human Sexuality
基金
国家社科基金青年项目阶段性成果(13CSH082)
关键词
同性恋
性角色
性别角色
角色错位
文化建构
Homosexual
Sexual Role
Gender Role
Role Dislocation
Cultural Construct