摘要
马克思恩格斯无论在理论上还是实践上都非常重视历史的经济解释。那么,历史为什么要经济解释呢?对于这个问题他们尽管没有专论,但在他们关于唯物史观的著述中,至少从历史的前提、历史的基础,历史的发展三个方面作了零散却全面的解释。这些解释告诉我们,历史需要经济解释,但经济解释只是历史解释的一种,尽管相对其他解释,这种解释是最为根本、最为有力的,但并不是无条件的,否则便是夸大真理走向谬误。
No matter in theory or in practice, Marx and Engels all attach great importance to the economic interpretation of history. So, wily history need the economic explanation? They have no monograph for this problem, but in their writings about the historical materialism, at least from the premise of history, the basis of the history and the development of history three aspects, they made the scattered but comprehensive explanation. These explanations tell us that history needs economic explanation, but the economic interpretation is a kind of historical explanation, although relative to other explanation, which is the most fundamental and most powerful, but it is not unconditional, otherwise is to exaggerate the truth to the fallacy.
出处
《河北经贸大学学报》
CSSCI
北大核心
2013年第6期31-34,共4页
Journal of Hebei University of Economics and Business
基金
教育部人文社会科学规划基金项目"中共党史的经济解释研究"(10YJA770050)的阶段性研究成果
关键词
马克思恩格斯
历史经济解释
劳动
经济生产
经济关系
经济条件
Marx and Engels
the historical economy explanation
labour
economy production
economy relationship
economy condition