期刊文献+

我国农业扭曲状况分析——基于世界银行农业扭曲指数数据库的考察 被引量:2

Agricultural Distortions in China: An Analysis Based on World Bank's Database
原文传递
导出
摘要 长期以来,农业部门的扭曲程度要远高于非农业部门,发达国家往往对农业进行正保护,而大多数发展中国家则采取对农业征税的态度,其中包括中国。本文采用世界银行农业扭曲指数数据库对我国农业扭曲状况进行分析,发现在相当长的一段时期内,我国对农业实行负保护,这集中体现在名义支持率为负值,不过随着我国政策向农业的倾斜,这一负值开始逐步减少,并且在1995年之后变为正值。通过分析我国的贸易减少指数和福利减少指数,得到两个重要结论,一是我国的贸易和福利状况在不断得到改善,二是不同农产品在这两个指数构成中存在很大的差异。 The degree of distortions to agricultural sector is much higher than non - agricultural sector for a long time. Incentives faced by farmers in developing countries were typically depressed by government policies, in contrast to the situation in most developed countries. This paper uses the indexes developed by World Bank to analyze agricultural distortions in China and shows that anti - agricultural, anti - trade, and welfare - reducing policies were prevalent in China for a long time which were reflected by negative NRA. With agricultural and trade policies reformed, NRA had declined and turned to be positive since 1995. Two clear conclusions can be drawn from the analysis of TRI and WRI in China. One is that situation of trade and welfare has been improved substantially, the other is that weights of different commodities in TRI and WRI vary a lot.
作者 李淑静 崔凡
出处 《经济评论》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第6期24-33,共10页 Economic Review
基金 对外经济贸易大学国内外联合培养研究生项目(项目编号:471402)的资助
关键词 农业扭曲 名义支持率 消费者等值税 贸易减少指数 福利减少指数 Agricultural Distortions NRA CTE TRI WRI
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1Anderson, K. , and W. Martin. 2008. "Distortions to Agricultural Incentives in China and Southeast Asia. " Agricultural Distortions Working Paper 69 , World Bank, Washington, DC.
  • 2Anderson, Kym, John Cockburn, and Will Martin. 2010. Agricultural Price Distortions, Inequality, and Poverty. Washington, D. C. : World Bank.
  • 3Anderson, K. , and Signe Nelgen. 2012. "Agricultural Trade Distortions during the Global Financial Crisis." Oxford Review of Economic Policy ,28 (1) :235 - 260.
  • 4Anderson, K. , Gordon Rausser, and Johan Swinnen. 2013. "Political Economy of Public Policies: Insights from Distortions to Agricultural and Food Markets. "Journal of Economic Literature ,51 (2) :423 - 477.
  • 5Bates, Robert H. 1981. Markets and States in Tropical Africa: The Political Basis of Agricultural Policies. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
  • 6Croser .Johanna L. , and K. Anderson. 2011." Agricultural Distortions in Sub - Saharan Africa : Trade and Welfare Indicators, 1961 to 2004. " World Bank Economic Review, 25 ( 2) : 250 - 277 .
  • 7Haberler, G. 1958. Trends in International Trade: Report by a Panel of Experts. Geneva: General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade.
  • 8Kishore, G. ,and Bernard, H. 2009 . Why Governments Tax or Subsidize Trade: Evidence from Agriculture. " Agricultural Distortions Working Paper 85 , May.
  • 9Krueger,Anne O. ,Maurice Schiff,and Alberto Valdes. 1988 . Agricultural Incentives in Developing Countries: Measuring the Effect of Sectorial and Economywide Policies. "World Bank Economic Review, 2 (3) : 255 - 271.
  • 10OECD. 2010. Agricultural Policies in OECD Countries: Monitoring and Evaluation 2010. Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.

同被引文献22

引证文献2

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部