期刊文献+

合作信息查寻与检索相关性判据的探索性因子分析 被引量:4

Analysis on Exploratory Factor of Relevance Criteria in Collaborative Information Seeking & Retrieval
原文传递
导出
摘要 基于案例研究结果及早期研究成果设计合作信息查寻与检索相关性的判据量表,通过问卷调查获取高校及科研院所学生合作信息查寻与检索的相关性判据使用数据,利用临界值比较、内部一致性分析、均值比较、探索性因子分析等方法对这些数据进行量化分析,得出以下主要结论:合作相关性判据量表的项目共34项,分属于8个类别,分别为信息来源特征、信息内容有用性、信息索引特征、信息表现形式、信息质量、可获取性、信息结构特征与信息传播特征;8个类别可解释的方差变异约为60%,表明相关性判据不是相关判断的唯一标准或依据,还有其他因素影响用户的相关判断过程。 The relevance criteria scale about collaborative information seeking and retrieval is given based on the cases study and early research achievements. The data on relevance judgment about it are collected with the questionnaire, which are completed by students of university and institute. Some exploratory statistical techniques, such as eritieal value comparison, internal consistence comparison, means comparison, and factor analysis, are applied to carry out quantitative analysis. Composed of 34 items in the relevance criteria scale, eight conceptual catalogues of collaborative relevance criteria are identified, which are information source characteristics, information content useflllness, information index cha,+acteristics, inlbrmation representation pattern, information quality, aecessibility, information strueture characteristics and information dissemination characteristics. But in terms of eight conceptual catalogues, probably 60% variation of variance can be interpreted, which means that the collaborative relevance criteria in the scale are not the sole basis to judge relevance and there are other factors to influence the collaborative relevance judgment.
出处 《图书情报工作》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第19期30-36,共7页 Library and Information Service
基金 国家社会科学基金项目"语境视角下合作信息查寻与检索的行为机制与相关性模型研究"(项目编号:12BTQ043)研究成果之一
关键词 合作信息查寻与检索 相关性 相关性判据 探索性因子分析 collaborative information seeking & retrieval relevance relevance criteria exploratory factor analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献31

  • 1Foster J.Collaborative information seeking and retrieval[J]. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 2006, 40: 329-356.
  • 2韩毅,李健,樊志伟,胡蓉,王艳,张克菊,金碧辉.合作信息检索的演化发展及研究现状[J].情报科学,2009,27(9):1430-1435. 被引量:13
  • 3吴丹,邱瑾.国外协同信息检索行为研究述评[J].中国图书馆学报,2012,38(6):100-110. 被引量:34
  • 4Baeza-Yates R, Ribeiro-Neto B.现代信息检索(影印版)[M].北京:机械工业出版社,2004:308.
  • 5Barry C L.User-defined relevance criteria: An exploratory study[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science,1994,45 (3):149-159.
  • 6Zhang X M.Collaborative relevance judgment:A group consensus method for evaluating user search performance[J].Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,2002,53(3):220-231.
  • 7Wu I, Liu D.A collaborative relevance feedback approach to task-driven recommendation[EB/OL]. [2012-10-17].http ://www. pacis - net. org/file/2OO3/papers/e - business/265, pdf.
  • 8Liu D, Wu I.Collaborative relevance assessment for task-based knowledge support[J].Decision Support Systems,2008,44(2):524-543.
  • 9Foley C, Smeaton A F, Lee H.Synchronous collaborative information retrieval with relevance feedback[EB/OL]. [2012-10-17].http ://doras. dcu. ie/222/1/ieee _ eollab _ com _2006. pdf.
  • 10Foley C.Division of labor and sharing of knowledge for synchronous collaborative information retrieval[D]. Dublin:Dublin City University,2008.

二级参考文献101

  • 1朱婕,靖继鹏,窦平安.国外信息行为模型分析与评价[J].图书情报工作,2005,49(4):48-51. 被引量:61
  • 2Hansen P,Javelin K. Collaborative information retrieval in an information-intensive domain[J]. Information Processing & Management, 2005,41 (5) : 1101-1119.
  • 3Catherine Blake,Wanda Pratt. Collaborative information synthesis I:A model of information behaviors of scientists in medicine and public health[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,2006,57 (13) : 1740-1749.
  • 4Mamata Bhandar,Shan-Ling Pan,Bernard C.Y. Tan. Towards understanding the roles of social capital it. knowledge hltegrafion:A case study of a collaborative information systems project [J]. Journal of the American Society for Informarion Science and Technology, 2007,58 (2) : 263-274.
  • 5Hassan Naderi,Beatriee Rumpler,and Jean-Marie Pinon. An Efficient Collaborative Information Retrieval System by Incorporating the User Pmfale [M]. S. Marchand-Maillet et al. (Eds.) : AMR 2006, LNCS 4398,2007 : 247-257.
  • 6Jason J. Jung. Ontological framework based on contextual mediation for collaborative information retrieval [J]. Informarion Retrieval, 2007 ( 1 O) : 85-109.
  • 7Madhu C. Reddy,Patricia Ruma Spence.Collaborative information seeking:A field study of a mulfidisciplinary patient care team [J]. Information Processing and Management, 2008,44 ( 1 ) : 242 - 255.
  • 8Morten Hertzum. Collaborative information seeking:The combined activity of information seeking and collaborative grounding [J]. Information Processing and Management, 2008,44 (2) : 957-962.
  • 9Proctor R, Goldenberg A, Davenport F. Genres in Support of Collaborative Information Retrieval in the Virtual Library [J]. Interacting with Computer, 1998,10(2) : 157-175.
  • 10Twidale M B,Nichols D M. Using Studies of Collaborative Activity in Physical Environments to Inform the Design of Digital Libraries [EB/OL]. http://www.comp.lancs.ac.uk/computing/research/cseg/projects/ariadne/docs/cscw98.html, 2008-10-12.

共引文献44

同被引文献72

  • 1成颖,孙建军.信息检索中的相关性研究[J].情报学报,2004,23(6):689-696. 被引量:13
  • 2孙建军,成颖.基于信息检索交互模型的相关性研究[J].中国图书馆学报,2005,31(1):41-45. 被引量:16
  • 3谭胜,马静,吴一占.基于主题描述模型的相关性判断在网页信息抽取中的应用[J].情报学报,2011,30(2):155-159. 被引量:6
  • 4Ingwersen P, Jarvelin K. The turn: Integration of information seeking and retrieval in context(the information retrieval series)[M]. New York: Springer-Verlag, Inc., 2005.
  • 5Robertson S E, Hancock-Beaulieu M M.On the evaluation of IR systems[J]. Information Processing & Management, 1992, 28(4): 457-466.
  • 6Cuadra C A, Katter R V. Opening the black box of “relevance”[J]. Journal of Documentation, 1967, 23(4): 291-303.
  • 7Rees A M, Schultz D G. A field experimental approach to the study of relevance assessments in relation to document searching[R]. Cleveland: Case Western Reserve University,1967.
  • 8Schamber L. Users' criteria for evaluation in multimedia information seeking and use situations[D]. New York: Syracuse University, 1991.
  • 9Park T K.The nature of relevance in information retrieval: An empirical study[J]. The Library Quarterly, 1993,63(3):318-351.
  • 10Cuadra C A.Experimental studies of relevance judgments. Final report. Volume 1:Project summary[M].Santa Monica: System Development Corporation, 1967.

引证文献4

二级引证文献14

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部