期刊文献+

基于BLISS和PMA的多学科可靠性设计优化 被引量:3

Multidisciplinary Reliability Design and Optimization Based on BLISS and PMA
原文传递
导出
摘要 针对多学科设计优化(MDO)中考虑不确定性而带来的计算复杂性问题,采用序列优化与可靠性评估(SORA)法的解耦思想,提出了基于两级集成系统综合(BLISS)策略和性能测量法(PMA)的多学科可靠性设计优化(RBMDO)方法。该方法将传统的3层嵌套循环的RBMDO方法过程解耦为顺序执行的确定性多学科设计优化(DMDO)和多学科可靠性分析(MRA),DMDO和MRA均采用BLISS策略进行计算,避免了每次多学科设计优化对完整可靠性分析模型的反复调用。飞机起落架缓冲器算例结果表明,文中方法的计算效率较其他两种方法分别提高了52.01%和26.51%,验证了方法的有效性。 In order to solve the computational complexity caused by the consideration of uncertainties in multidisciplinary de- sign optimization (MDO), an efficient method for reliability-based MDO (RBMDO) based on the bi-level integrated system synthesis (BLISS) and performance measure approach (PMA) is proposed. With the decoupling idea of sequential optimiza- tion and reliability assessment (SORA) method, the conventional triple nested loop of RBMDO is decoupled into a series of sequential execution of deterministic multidisciplinary design optimization (DMDO) and multidisciplinary reliability analysis (MRA). Both the DMDO and MRA are implemented by BLISS, which avoids the total computation of the whole multidiscipli- nary reliability analysis model iteratively in each RBMDO cycle. Finally, a shock absorber of landing gear example has been demonstrated to verify the efficiency of the proposed method, which shows that the efficiency of the proposed method has been improved by 52.01% and 26.51% respectively compared to the other two methods.
出处 《航空学报》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2013年第10期2349-2356,共8页 Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica
基金 国家自然科学基金(51175019 51205238) 江苏省自然科学基金(BK20130999) 江苏省普通高校自然科学研究资助项目(13KJB460012) 中国博士后科学基金(230210235)~~
关键词 两级集成系统综合 性能测量法 多学科可靠性设计优化 可靠性 缓冲器 bi-level integrated system synthesis performance measure approach reliability-based multidisciplinary design optimization reliability absorber
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献57

共引文献43

同被引文献31

  • 1刘德顺,岳文辉,杜小平.不确定性分析与稳健设计的研究进展[J].中国机械工程,2006,17(17):1834-1841. 被引量:36
  • 2冯世琪,廖林清,杨翔宇.非概率稳健可靠性理论及其发展趋势[J].重庆工学院学报,2007,21(3):45-50. 被引量:4
  • 3陈晋阳,洪泉富,黄颖,等.GB/T3273-2005汽车大梁用热轧钢板和钢带[S].北京:中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局,中国国家标准化管理委员会,2005.
  • 4Sobieski J S, Haftka R T. Multidisciplinary aerospace design optimization: survey of recent developments[J]. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 1997, 14(1): 1-23.
  • 5Kang Z, Luo Y. Reliability-based structural optimization with probability and convex set hybrid models[J]. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2010, 42(1): 89-102.
  • 6Agarwal H, Renaud J, Preston L, et al. Uncertainty quantification using evidence theory in multidisciplinary design optimization[J]. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2004, 85(1-3): 281-294.
  • 7Aoues Y, Chateauneuf A. Benchmark study of numerical methods for reliability-based design optimization[J]. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2010, 41(2): 277-294.
  • 8Sues R H, Cesare M A. An innovative framework for reliability-based MDO[C]//AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference, 2000: 1-8.
  • 9Padmanabhan D, Batill S M. Decomposition strategies for reliability based optimization in multidisciplinary system design[C]//AIAA/USAF/NASA/ISSMO Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization, 2002: 1-15.
  • 10Du X, Guo J, Harish B. Sequential optimization and reliability assessment for multidisciplinary systems design[J]. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2008, 35(2): 117-130.

引证文献3

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部