期刊文献+

重庆缙云山酸雨区森林土壤酸缓冲机制及影响因素 被引量:18

Acidic Buffering Capability and Its Influencing Factors of Typical Forests Soil in Jinyun Mountain,Chongqing
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为探讨酸雨区森林土壤的酸缓冲机制,采集重庆缙云山4种典型林分(针阔叶混交林、常绿阔叶林、毛竹林和灌木林)不同土层土壤样品,研究森林土壤酸缓冲特性及其影响因素。结果表明:①同一土壤在不同的pH阶段其酸缓冲能力相差很大,这是由于土壤不同缓冲机制所造成的。当pH>3.0时,土壤中起主要缓冲作用的是土壤有机质、CEC、交换性Al 3+等;当pH<3.0时,土壤的主要缓冲机制为土壤矿物质的风化,土壤pH成为影响缓冲作用的主要因素。②在pH>3.0时,不同土壤酸缓冲能力相差较大,4种林分土壤平均缓冲能力大小为灌木林(25.58mmol/kg)>常绿阔叶林(23.81mmol/kg)>针阔叶混交林(19.43mmol/kg)>毛竹林(17.12mmol/kg),且同一林分表层土壤酸缓冲能力大于下层土壤。③当pH<3.0时,所有土壤的缓冲能力都急剧增强,pH越低,土壤酸缓冲能力越强,在同一pH阶段不同土壤酸缓冲能力相近。④按照对酸害容量划分,4种林分土壤全部属于易受害、稍易受害土壤,酸沉降极易对植物造成伤害,强烈建议对缙云山森林土壤进行改良,提高其土壤pH值和酸缓冲能力,同时,加大对环境的监控,减小酸雨发生频率。 In order to study the buffer mechanism of forests soil in acid rain region,four forests soil(mixed woods,broadleaf forests,bamboo forests and shrub forests)were studied in the Jinyun mountain of the Three Gorges Region through acid-base titration.The results showed that:①The soil buffering capability was various with the change of pH due to the mechanism of buffering.When pH3.0,organic matter,CEC and exchangable Al 3+were the main soil buffer compounds,but when pH 3.0,the main buffering mechanism was weathering of the soil minerals,so soil pH became the mian influencing factor.②When pH 3.0,there was a large diffence between the soil buffering capability.The order of average values of siol pH buffering capacity of the four typical forest stands was shrub forests(25.58mmol/kg)broadleaf forests(23.81mmol/kg)mixed woods(19.43mmol/kg)bamboo forests(17.12mmol/kg),and the capacity of surface layer was larger than that of subsurface layer.③When pH3.0,the buffering capability of all soils was becoming strongly considerablely.And it was becoming stronger with the decrease of soil pH.④According to the classification of acid-damage intensity capacities of soil,all soils belonged to vulnerable and slightly vulnerable.So the plants growing on them were easy to be hurt by the acidic precipitation.Therefore,the soil should be improved their pH and soil buffering capability,enhanced environmental quality monitoring and reduced the frequency of acid rain.
出处 《水土保持学报》 CSCD 北大核心 2013年第5期77-83,共7页 Journal of Soil and Water Conservation
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(31100515) 高等学校博士学科点专项科研基金项目(20110014120001)
关键词 土壤酸化 土壤酸缓冲能力 土壤酸缓冲容量 土壤酸害容量 soil acidification soil buffering capability soil acid buffering capacity soil acid-damage intensity capacity
  • 相关文献

参考文献20

  • 1Posch M,Reinds G J. A very simple dynamic soil acidification model for scenario analyses and target load calculations [J]. Environmental Modeling and Software, 2009,24 : 329 340.
  • 2王文婧,戴万宏.安徽主要土壤酸碱性及其酸缓冲性能研究[J].中国农学通报,2012,28(15):67-72. 被引量:31
  • 3Weaber A R,Kissel D E, Chen F, et al. Mapping soil pH buffering capacity of selected fields in the coastal plain[J]. SoilScience Society of America Journal, 2004,68(2) : 662-668.
  • 4沈月,依艳丽,张大庚,栗杰,依妍,徐龙超.耕地棕壤酸碱缓冲性能及酸化速率研究[J].水土保持学报,2012,26(1):95-100. 被引量:30
  • 5姜军,徐仁扣,赵安珍.用酸碱滴定法测定酸性红壤的pH缓冲容量[J].土壤通报,2006,37(6):1247-1248. 被引量:48
  • 6Aitken R L, Moody P W. The effect of valence and ionic strength on the measurement of pH buffer capacity[J]. Australian Journal of Soil Research, 1994,32 : 975-984.
  • 7Slattery W J, Edwards D G, Bell L C, et al. Soil acidification and the carbon cycIe in a cropping soil of north-eastern Victoria [J]. Australian Journal of Soil Research, 1998,36(2) : 273-290.
  • 8Lesturgez G, Poss R, Noble A, et al. Soil acidification without pH drop under intensive cropping systems in northeast Thailand[J]. Agriculture, Ecosystems 8> Environment, 2006,114 (1/2) : 239-248.
  • 9重庆市环保局.2011年环境状况公报[EB/OL].(20132-16)[2013-2-16].http://www.cepb.gov.cn/hbjc/hjzll/szzkgb.htm.
  • 10王云琦,王玉杰.三峡库区典型森林植被生态水文功能[J].生态学杂志,2010,29(10):1892-1900. 被引量:12

二级参考文献69

共引文献362

同被引文献290

引证文献18

二级引证文献85

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部