期刊文献+

基于CPTU的中国实用土分类方法研究 被引量:42

Practical soil classification methods in China based on piezocone penetration tests
下载PDF
导出
摘要 国际上已有比较成熟的基于原位孔压静力触探测试(CPTU)的土分类方法,这些方法多以美国统一土质分类标准(USCS)为依据,其土类与中国土的工程分类标准不对应。因此,建立基于CPTU原位测试参数、符合中国标准的土工程分类方法具有重要工程意义。通过选择江苏典型地质成因的试验场地,进行了95孔CPTU测试和相应的钻孔取样与室内土工试验,其CPTU孔和相应钻孔之间距离小于5 m,对采用室内土工试验依据中国国家标准《岩土工程勘察规范》得到的土分类和CPTU测试参数进行了系统对比分析。选择国外7种常用的CPTU土分类图进行应用比较,发现Robertson的土类指数法分类图能提供最好的分类结果,据此建立了中国基于CPTU土类指数法的实用土分类方法,已有测试资料应用表明该分类图的准确率达到95%以上,可用作为中国工程场地采用原位CPTU测试进行土工程分类的方法。 The parameters obtained fi'om the piezocone penetration tests (CPTU) are commonly used for soil profiling and geostratigraphy, along with the parameters used for assessment of geotechnical design. Numerous classification charts of soil behaviors are developed, but most of them are on the basis of ASTM Unified Soil Classification System (USCS), which is different from China' standards of soil classification. The relationship between CPTU measurements and engineering classification standards of soils in China needs to be established to take full advantage of piezocone soundings. Piezocone penetration tests, borings and laboratory tests are carried out at 95 locations of typical geologic formations in Jiangsu Province, China, in which, the distances between CPTU soundings and adjacent boreholes are less than 5 meters. Thus the CPTU data are fully analyzed and validated for providing a reasonable soil classification. Based on a systematic review of literatures, seven classification charts of soil behaviors are chosen to determine the soil types fi'om the CPTU data at all the test sites, and these results are further validated with the soil classification types determined from the field samples and laboratory test results according to China's standards. It is shown that compared with the other six classification charts, the soil behavior classification based on the soil behavior type index I^RW~ proposed by Robertson (2009) can give the best results, but the chart needs to be modified to adapt the region-specific feature. Thus, a soil classification chart based on the CPTU modified from Robertson (2009) and coordinated with China's standards is developed. In this chart, soils are classified as middle sand, fine sand, silty sand, silt, silty clay, clay, muck and mucky soils based on a normalized cone parameter Qt~ with a variable stress exponent and normalized friction ratio F~.
出处 《岩土工程学报》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2013年第10期1765-1776,共12页 Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(41202203) 国家科技支撑计划项目(2012BAJ01B02) 江苏省自然科学基金重点项目(BK2010060) 中央高校基本科研业务费资助项目(3221003202)
关键词 孔压静力触探 土分类 孔隙水压力 土类指数 归一化锥尖阻力 piezocone soil classification pore water pressure soil behavior type index normalized cone tip resistance
  • 相关文献

参考文献41

  • 1ASTM. Standard practice for classification of soils for engineering purpose (USCS)[S]. ASTM Standard D2487. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, Pa.
  • 2GB/T50145-2007土的工程分类标准[S].北京:中国计划出版社,2008.
  • 3GB50021-2001,岩土工程勘察规范[s].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2009.
  • 4ROBERTSON P K, CAMPANELLA R G, GILLESPIE D, et al. Use of piezometer cone data[C]//Proceedings of the ASCE Specialty Conference In Situ'86: Use of In Situ Tests in Geotechnical Engineering. Blacksburg, 1986:1263 - 1280.
  • 5ROBERTSON P K. Soil classification using the cone penetration test[J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 1990, 27(1): 151 - 158.
  • 6ROBERTSON P K. Interpretation of cone penetration tests - a unified approach[J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 2009, 46(11): 1337- 1355.
  • 7ESLAMI A, FELLENIUS B H. Pile capacity by direct CPT and CPTu methods applied to 102 case histories[J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 1997, 34(6): 886 - 904.
  • 8SCHNEIDER J A, RANDOLPH M F, MAYNE P W, RAMSEY N R. Analysis of factors influencing soil classification using normalizing piezocone tip resistance and pore pressure parameters[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2008, 134(11): 1569- 1586.
  • 9BEGEMANN H K S. The friction jacket cone as an aid in determining the soil profile[C]// Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, ICSMFE. Montreal, 1965, 2:17 - 20.
  • 10SANGLERAT G~ NHIM T V, SEJOURNE M, et al. Direct soil classification by static penetrometer with special friction sleeve[C]//Proceedings of the First European Symposium on Penetration Testing, ESOPT-1. Stockholm, 1974, 2.2: 337- 344.

二级参考文献7

  • 1张诚厚,南京炼油厂石埠桥油库区地基土工程特性的试验研究,1995年
  • 2张诚厚,昆山试验段软土工程特性的试验研究,1993年
  • 3张诚厚,利用孔压静力触探试验快速测定软土地基状图的研究,1993年
  • 4张诚厚,利用孔压静力探试验指标计算路基沉降量的方法,1993年
  • 5施健,用孔压圆锥消散试验测试固结系数的研究,1993年
  • 6张诚厚,Eng Geol,1990年,29卷,31页
  • 7张诚厚,Gert Greeuw.由孔压圆锥消散试验测定固结系数的方法[J].岩土工程学报,1991,13(2):51-62. 被引量:10

共引文献61

同被引文献275

引证文献42

二级引证文献211

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部