中国反倾销路径与特征——兼与其他“金砖国家”比较被引量：3

Path and Characteristics of China's Anti-dumping Filing——Compared with Other BRICs Nations

下载PDF

导出

摘要中国在遭遇全球最多的反倾销诉讼的同时,也积极发起反倾销。"金砖国家"作为新兴经济体的代表,在反倾销上的姿态相当积极,尤其是印度和南非。中国反倾销路径与特征和"金砖国家"存在一定共性,但也有明显差异。利用经验数据分析,中国对于国内产业安全和市场稳定的考虑是其首要因素,对于主要贸易伙伴发起的反倾销占主体。其余"金砖国家"则更多集中于发展中经济体,"金砖国家"内部反倾销密度和强度明显强于中国。中国同其他"金砖国家"在反倾销上同样存在贸易报复的意图。 China filed anti-dumping （AD） actively while encountered the most AD filing in the globe. BRICs, as the symbols of newly emerged markets, take a rather active attitude in AD filing, cap. India and South Africa. China shows some common path and characteristics with other BRICs in addition to some distinctions. Using the empirical data, the paper believes that the consideration of domestic industrial security and market steady is the utmost reason in AD filing. The more China traded with, the more China filed AD to. Other BRICs filed more AD to developing economies, esp. the inner AD intensity of BRICs is even higher than that of China. All of BR1Cs are likely to revenge while they are considering the targets of AD filing.

作者梁俊伟

机构地区山东大学经济学院

出处《当代经济管理》 2013年第10期43-50,共8页 Contemporary Economic Management

基金教育部人文与社会科学基金青年项目<新贸易保护主义对我国外贸影响及对策研究>(11YJCGJW012)

关键词系统动力学产业结构安全评价体系 anti-dumping BRICs AD intensity trade revenge

分类号 F741.2 [经济管理—国际贸易]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献9

1鲍晓华.中国是否遭遇了歧视性反倾销?——兼与其他出口国的比较[J].管理世界,2011,27(3):32-43. 被引量：48
2李向阳.金砖国家经济面临的共同机遇与挑战[J].求是,2011(8):60-62. 被引量：11
3[美]罗伯特·吉尔平.国际关系政治经济学[M].北京:经济科学出版社,1989..
4辛仁杰,孙现朴.金砖国家合作机制与中印关系[J].南亚研究,2011(3):86-99. 被引量：20
5岳昌君.国际贸易、比较优势与技术传递[D].北京大学博士研究生毕业论文.2000.
6Bagwell, K. and Staiger, R..A Theory of Managed Trade[J]. Ameri-can Economic Review, 1990,80:779-795.
7Messerlin, P. A. and Reed G..Antidumping Policies in the United States and the European Community [J].The Economic Journal, 1995,105:1565-1575.
8Prusa, T. J..Antidumping: A Growing Problem in International Trade[J].The World Economy, 2005,28(5): 683-700.
9Prnsa, T. J., and Skeath S..Modern Commercial Policy Managed Trade and Retaliation?[Z].in Handbook of International Trade: the Economic and Legal Analysis of Trade Policy and Institutions, edited by Choi E.K., and Hartigan J.C. 2004.

二级参考文献59

1谢建国.经济影响、政治分歧与制度摩擦——美国对华贸易反倾销实证研究[J].管理世界,2006,22(12):8-17. 被引量：110
2Aggarwal, Aradhna, 2004, "Macro Economic Determinants of Antidumping: A Comparative Analysis of Developed and Developing Countries", World Development, 32(6), pp.1043-1057.
3Bao, Xiaohua and Larry D. Qiu, 2011, "Is China's Anti-dumping more Retaliatory than that of the US?", forthcoming in Review ofln-ternational Economics.
4Blonigen, Bruce A. and Chad P. Bown, 2003, "Antidumping and Retaliation Threats", Journal of International Economics, 60, pp. 249-273.
5Blonigen, Bruce A., 2005, "The Effects of (CUSFTA and) NAFTA on Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Activity", The World Bank Economic Review, 19(3), pp.407-424.
6Bown, Chad P. and IcCulloch, Rachel, 2005, "U. S. Trade Policy toward China: Discrimination and Its Implications", Paper for presentation at the PAFTAD 30 conference at the East - West Center in Honolulu, February.
7Bown, Chad P., 2010, "China' s WTO Entry-Antidumping, Safeguards and Dispute Settlement", in Robert C. Feenstra and Shang-Jin Wei (eds.), China's Growing Role in World Trade, University of Chicago Press for the NBER, pp.281~337 (chapter 8).
8Deardorff, Alan V. and Robert M. Stern, 2005, "A Centennial of Anti-dumping Legislation and Implementation- Introduction and Overview", World Economy, 28(5), pp. 633-640.
9Debapriya, Aryashree and Tapan Kumar Panda, 2006, "An-ti-dumping Retaliation: A Common Threat to International Trade", Global Business Review, 7 (2), pp.297-311.
10Feinberg, R. M., 1989, "Exchange Rates and Unfair Trade", Review of Economic and Statistics, 71, pp.704-707.