期刊文献+

Ranking Potential Reply-Providers in Community Question Answering System 被引量:4

社区问答系统中潜在回答者排序算法(英文)
下载PDF
导出
摘要 Community Question Answering (CQA) websites have greatly facilitated users' lives, with an increasing number of people seeking help and exchanging ideas on the Internet. This newlymerged community features two characteristics: social relations and an ask-reply mechanism. As users' behaviours and social statuses play a more important role in CQA services than traditional answer retrieving websites, researchers' concerns have shifted from the need to passively find existing answers to actively seeking potential reply providers that may give answers in the near future. We analyse datasets derived from an online CQA system named "Quora", and observed that compared with traditional question answering services, users tend to contribute replies rather than questions for help in the CQA system. Inspired by the findings, we seek ways to evaluate the users' ability to offer prompt and reliable help, taking into account activity, authority and social reputation char- acteristics. We propose a hybrid method that is based on a Question-User network and social network using optimised PageRank algorithm. Experimental results show the efficiency of the proposed method for ranking potential answer-providers. Community Question Answering(CQA) websites have greatly facilitated users' lives, with an increasing number of people seeking help and exchanging ideas on the Internet. This newly-emerged community features two characteristics: social relations and an ask-reply mechanism. As users' behaviours and social statuses play a more important role in CQA services than traditional answer retrieving websites, researchers' concerns have shifted from the need to passively find existing answers to actively seeking potential reply providers that may give answers in the near future. We analyse datasets derived from an online CQA system named "Quora", and observed that compared with traditional question answering services, users tend to contribute replies rather than questions for help in the CQA system. Inspired by the findings, we seek ways to evaluate the users' ability to offer prompt and reliable help, taking into account activity, authority and social reputation characteristics. We propose a hybrid method that is based on a Question-User network and social network using optimised PageRank algorithm.Experimental results show the efficiency of the proposed method for ranking potential answer-providers.
出处 《China Communications》 SCIE CSCD 2013年第10期125-136,共12页 中国通信(英文版)
基金 supported by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant No.61271041 the National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program) under Grant No.2009CB320504 the iCore Integrated Project under Grant No.287708 the National Scienceand Technology Major Project under Grants No.2012ZX03005008-001,No.2012ZX03002008
关键词 CQA user behaviour analysis question-user network social network PAGERANK activity estimation authority estimation 答疑系统 供应商 社区 PageRank算法 社会关系 回复 应答机制 研究人员
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1Mao Cunli,Chen Fangqiong,Yu Zhengtao,Guo Jianyi,Zong Huanyun.Answer Ranking with Discourse Structure Feature[J].China Communications,2012,9(3):110-123. 被引量:1
  • 2ZHANG Jun. ACKERMAN M S, ADAMIC L. Expertise Networks in Online Communities: Structure and Algorithms[C]/ / Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on World Wide Web (WWW'07): May 8-12, 2007. Banff, Alberta, Canada. ACM, 2005: 221-230.
  • 3CHEN Lin, NAYAK R. Expertise Analysis in a Question Answer Portal for Author Ranking[C]// Proceedings of the 2008 IEEE/WIC/ ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology 2008 (WI-IAr08): December 9-12, 2008. Sydney, NSW, Australia. IEEE Computer Society, 2008: 134-140.
  • 4LIU Mingrong, LIU Yicen, YANG Qing. Predicting Best Answerers for New Questions in Community Question Answer[C]// Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Web-Age Information Management (WAIM'10): July 15-17, 2010. Jiuzhaigou, China. Springer, 2010: 127-138.
  • 5LIU Xiaoyong, CROFT W B, KOLL M. Finding Experts in Community-Based Question-Answering Services[C]// Proceedings of the 14th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM'05): October 31-November 5, 2005. Bremen, Germany. ACM, 2005: 315-316.
  • 6GUO Jinwen, XU Shenqlianq. BAO Shenghua, et al. Tapping on the Potential of Q&A Community by Recommending Answer Providers[C]// Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Information and Knowledge Management: October 26-30, 2008. Napa Valley, California, USA. ACM: 921-930.
  • 7ZHOU Yanhong, CONG Gao, CUI Bin, et al. Routing Questions to the Right Users in Online Communities[C]// Proceedings of the 2009 IEEE International Conference on Data Engineering: March 29-April 2, 2009. Shanghai, China. IEEE Computer Society, 2009: 700- 711.
  • 8LI Baichuan, IRWIN K. Routing Questions to Appropriate Answerers in Community Question Answering Services[C]// Proceedings of the 19th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management: October 26-30, 2010. Toronto, Ontario, Canada. ACM, 2010: 1585-1588.
  • 9BRODER A, KUMAR R, MAGHOUL F, et al. Graph Structure in the Web[J]. Computer Networks, 2000, 33(1-6): 309-320.
  • 10JAVA A. SONG Xiaodan, FININ T, et al. Why We Twitter: Understanding Microblogging Usage and Communities[Cl// Proceedings of the 9th Web-KDD and 1st SNA-KDD 2007 Workshop on Web Mining and Social Network Analysis: August 12, 2007. San Jose, California, USA. ACM, 2007: 56-65.

二级参考文献7

同被引文献43

引证文献4

二级引证文献35

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部