死刑刑事政策视野下的集资诈骗罪死刑适用正当性质疑

The Query of the Legitimacy of the Application of the Death Penalty in Fund-raising Fraud

死刑判决标准,尤其是死刑立即执行的司法判决标准,已经呈现出一种明显的不平衡现象。经济犯罪的死刑规定只应当具有宣示的作用,集资诈骗犯罪不应当适用死刑。刑法立法的基本走向及其对死刑的限缩规定趋势,要求司法必须遵循同样的限制适用思路与严格解释逻辑;没有法定减轻处罚事由的故意杀人犯罪、数额特别巨大的受贿犯罪可以不判处死刑立即执行,集资诈骗罪更没有理由判决死刑立即执行。其他金融诈骗犯罪都废除了死刑,集资诈骗罪作为金融诈骗罪中的一种,就应当采最为严格的司法解释立场,将集资诈骗罪死刑规定解释为几乎难以运用的刑种。在经济犯罪的死刑立法废止之前,最大限度地限制并争取事实上停止死刑的适用,应当成为经济犯罪刑事政策的基本目标与当然内容。

The standards of the death sentence, especially the judicial decisions of the immediate execution of the death penalty, have been taking on a mass of confusion. The death penalty provisions of the economic crime should serve as an empty clause, not to mention the application in fraudulent fund raising. The basic direction of the criminal law legislation and its increasingly restricted regulation of the death penalty, require that the legitimacy also follow the thought of restricted application and the logic of strict interpretation. When those who are found guilty of intentional homicide without legal mitigated punishment and of bribery with extremely huge amount of money may not be sentenced to immediate execution of death penalty, it is less justified to punish those fraudulent fund raising criminals in the same manner. Therefore, fraudulent fund raising, one of the financial frauds, should be interpreted in such a strict and judicial way that death penalty, which has been abolished in other forms of financial fraud, is hardly applicable. Accordingly, an utmost restriction and an ultimate stop of death penalty should become the basic ob Ject and exnlicit content of criminal nolicv in economic crimes hafare the and af claath nannltv ;n pc.nnnrnic. 1,=~;t;