期刊文献+

加速器一年QUICKCHECK检测结果与评价

The Results and Evaluation of the Quick Check Examination on the Linear Accelerator in One Year
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的对加速器射野参数一年的QUICKCHECK结果进行统计和分析,评估加速器射野中心轴剂量、平坦度、对称性、射线质、剂量率的一致性。方法 2012年2月至2013年2月间,加速器正常运行216天,故障47天。利用QUICKCHECK共对加速器共进行216次检测,检测的参数包括中心轴剂量、平坦度、对称性(G/T方向和L/R方向)、射线质、剂量率。对检测的数据进行统计和分析,评估加速器的稳定性。结果对于10 cm×10 cm射野,中心轴剂量为(100±2.3)MU,有11次(5.09%)检测结果超过2%。平坦度检测值为(100±2.6)%,有4次(1.85%)超过2%。对称性(G/T方向)检测值为(100±1.4)%。对称性(L/R方向)检测值为100±2.7%,有4次(1.85%)超过2%。射线质检测值为(100±2.79)%,有3次(1.39%)超过2%。剂量率检测值为(300±11.2)MU/min。对于20 cm×20 cm射野,中心轴剂量为(100±2.1)MU,有11次(5.09%)检测结果超过2%。平坦度检测结果为(100±1.2)%。对称性(G/T方向)为(100±0.27)%,对称性(L/R方向)为(100±1.27)%,射线质为(100±0.35)%。结论中心轴剂量合格率为94.91%,平坦度合格率为98.15%,对称性合格率为100%,射线质合格率为100%,剂量率合格率为100%。除中心轴剂量外,加速器各项参数的一致性合格率都在98%以上,具有很好的稳定性。 Objective To collect data about the QUICK CHECK on a linear accelerator' s field parameters, analyze the results, and evaluate the consistency of central axis dose, the flatness, symmetry, radiation quality and dose rate of the ac celerator' s fields. Methods During February 2012 and February 2013, the accelerator worked normally for 216 days and had breakdown for 47 days. We utilized QUICK CHECK to examine the two fields of 10 cmx 10 cm and 20 cm x 20cm and used the check results as a standard for following detection. We used QUICK CHECK to examine the linear accelerator for 216 times. Detected parameters included central axis dose, flatness, symmetry (along directions of ( gun - target) G/T and L/R (left -right) ) , radiation quality and dose rate. We collected and analyzed the detection data, and then evaluated the stability of the accelerator. Results For the field of 10 cm x 10 cm, the central axis dose was ( 100 ± 2.3) MU, and detected results exceeded 2% for 11 times (5.09%). The detection value of flatness was ( 100 ± 2.6) % , and the results exceeded 2% for d times ( 1.85% ). The detection value of symmetry (direction of G/T) was ( 100 ± 1.4) % , the value of symmetry ( direction of L/R) was ( 100 ± 2.7 ) % , and 4 ( 1.85% ) of the results exceeded 2%. The detection value of radiation quality was ( 100± 2.79) % , and exceeded 2% for 3 times ( 1.39% ). The detection value of dose rate was 300 ±11.2 MU/min. For the field of 20 cm x 20 cm, the central axis dose was ( 100 ± 2.1 ) MU, and detected results exceeded 2% for 11 times (5.09%). The detection value of flatness was ( 100± 1.2) %. The value of symmetry ( direction of G/T) was ( 100 ± 0.27 ) % , the one of symmetry ( direction of L/R) was ( 100± 1.27 ) %, radiation quality ( l00 ± 0. 35% ). Conclusion The qualified rate of central axis dose was 94.91% , flatness 98.15% , symmetry 100% , radiation quality 100% and dose rate 100%. Except for the central axis dose, the qualified rates of consistency of the parameters were all above 98%. Therefore the accelerator' s sta bility was excellent.
机构地区 解放军第
出处 《中国辐射卫生》 2013年第5期524-526,共3页 Chinese Journal of Radiological Health
基金 军事医学计量专项课题(2011-JL2-050)
关键词 加速器 QUICKCHECK 检测 Accelerator QUICKCHECK Examination
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1Machluf Y, Pirogovsky A, Pahna E, et al. Coordinated com- puterized systems aimed at management, control, and quality assurance of medical processes and informatics [ J ]. Int J Health Care Qual Assur, 2012,25 ( 8 ) :663 - 681.
  • 2JU SG, AHN YC, HUH SJ, et al. Film dosimetry for intensi- ty modulated radiation therapy: Dosimetric evaluation [ J ]. Mcd Phys,2002 ,29 :351 - 355.
  • 3徐慧军,李玉,张素静,刘小亮,吴昊.DAVID系统探测射野大小和剂量偏差能力的检测与分析[J].中国医学工程,2012,20(12):1-2. 被引量:2
  • 4Klein EE, Hanley J, Bayouth J,et al. Task Group 142 re port : quality assurance of medical accelerators [ J ] . Med Phys, 2009, 36(9) :4197 -212.
  • 5Fontenot JD. Feasibility of a remote, automated daily delivery verification of volumetric - modulated arc therapy treatments using a commercial record and verify system [ J ]. J Appl Clin Med Phys, 2012,13(2) :3606.
  • 6Peng JL, Kahler D, Li JG, et al. Feasibility study of per- forming IGRT system daily QA using a commercial QA device [J]- J Appl Clin Med Phys, 2011, 12(3) :3535.
  • 7Bissonnette JP, Moseley D, White E,et al. Quality assurance for the geometric accuracy of cone - beam CT guidance in ra- diation therapy[J]. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2008, 71 ( 1 Suppl) :S57 -61.
  • 8Mubata CD, Childs P, Bidmead AM. A quality assurance pro- cedure for the Varian multi - leaf collimator[ J ]. Phys Med Biol, 1997, 42(2) :423 -31.
  • 9Lim S, Ma SY, Jeung TS, et al. Development of a one - stop beam verification system using electronic portal imaging de- vices for routine quality assurance[ J]. Med Dosim, 2012 , 37(3) :296 -304.

二级参考文献11

  • 1李玉,韩悦荣,刘骁雄.射波刀//李玉,梁军.三维适形与调强放射治疗的基础与临床.北京:北京科学技术出版社,2010:290-295.
  • 2梁军,李玉,柴广金.图像引导技术与肝胆胰肿瘤放射治疗//李玉.肝胆胰恶性肿瘤的微创技术.北京:科学技术技术出版社,2009:88-97.
  • 3Marci e S,Charpiot E,Bensadoun RJ,et al.In vivo measurements with MOSFET detectors in oropharynx and nasopharynx intensity-modulated radiation therapy[J].Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys,2005,61 (5): 1603-1606.
  • 4Partridge M,Ebert M,Hesse BM.IMRT verification by three- dimensional dose reconstruction from portal beam measurements[J]. Med Phys,2002,29(8): 1847 - 1858.
  • 5Poppe B,Thieke C,Beyer D,et al.DAVID--a translucent multi-wire transmission ionization chamber for in vivo verification of IMRT and conformal irradiation techniques[J].Phys Med Biol,2006,51(5):1237- 1248.
  • 6Looe HK,Harder D,R ti hmann A,et al.Enhanced accuracy of the permanent surveillance of IMRT deliveries by iterativedeconvolution of DAVID chamber signal profiles[J].Phys Med Biol,2010,55(14):3981-3992.
  • 7Poppe B,Looe HK,Chofor N,et al.Clinical performance of a transmission detector array for the permanent supervision of IMRT deliveries[J].Radiother Oncol,2010,95(2): 158-165.
  • 8Higgins PD,Alaei P,Gerbi BJ,et al.In vivo diode dosimetry for routine quality assurance in IMRT[J].Med Phys,2003,50( 12):3118-3123.
  • 9李玉,徐慧军,张素静,韩萍.G4射波刀照射精度的验证与评价[J].中国现代医生,2012,50(15):112-115. 被引量:18
  • 10徐慧军,李玉,张素静,朴俊杰,杨晓.G4射波刀蒙特卡罗算法的建立与评价[J].中国医学影像技术,2012,28(10):1932-1935. 被引量:8

共引文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部