期刊文献+

牙本质肩领形态对氧化锆桩核修复抗折强度影响的研究 被引量:8

The effect of ferrule modes on fracture resistance of teeth restored with zirconia post and core
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:评价不同牙本质肩领形态的尖牙行一体式氧化锆桩核修复后的抗折强度。方法:选择50颗新近拔除的上颌尖牙,随机分为5组,每组10颗,根管治疗后根据牙本质肩领的缺损程度对样本进行分类处理,各组的设计方案为:A组,保留高度为2.0mm的完整牙本质肩领作为对照组;B组,去除唇侧牙本质肩领;C组,去除近中及唇侧牙本质肩领;D组,只保留远中牙本质肩领;E组,磨除整个牙本质肩领。使用万能材料测试机对样本进行抗折强度测试,所得结果采用SPSS 13.0软件对样本的抗折强度进行单因素方差分析和组间两两比较的q检验分析,检验水准α=0.05。结果:5组样本的抗折强度如下:A组1026.30±139.01N,B组878.20±105.67N,C组845.70±100.56N,D组710.20±96.91N,E组686.00±89.91N。其中B组与C组、D组与E组组间比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),其余各组间比较差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:一体式氧化锆桩核修复时,保存唇舌侧牙本质肩领对提高患牙的抗折强度有重要意义。 Objective:To study the fracture resistance of endodontically treated canines restored with one-piece milled zirconia post and core in the varying ferrule modes.Methods:Fifty recently extracted human maxillary canines were endodontically treated and randomly divided into 5 groups with 10 specimens in each.According to the defect degree of ferrule,the specimens were prepared to standardized specifications and used a universal testing machine to text the fracture resistance.Statistical analysis was performed by One-Way ANOVA and q-test.Results:The mean fracture resistances of five groups were as follows:1019.30± 139.01N for group A,861.20± 105.67N for group B,833.70± 100.56N for group C,733.20± 96.91N for group D,698.00± 99.90N for group E.The fracture resistance of restored teeth between group B and group C,as well as group D and group E had no statistically significant difference (P〉0.05).The comparisons of the fracture resistance between the rest pairwise groups had statistically significant differences (P〈 0.05).Conclusion:This study supported evidences that reservation of the labial and lingual ferrule was a key point to increase the fracture resistance of canines restored with one-piece milled zirconia post and core.
作者 张鹏 姚峰
出处 《口腔颌面修复学杂志》 2013年第5期294-297,共4页 Chinese Journal of Prosthodontics
关键词 牙本质肩领 抗折强度 氧化锆 桩核 ferrule fracture resistance zirconia post-core
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1侯秀娟,陈丕铭,刘翠玲,杨丕山,高旭.牙本质肩领的应用对不同桩核修复后修复体抗折性能的影响[J].口腔颌面修复学杂志,2010,11(4):210-213. 被引量:18
  • 2Fragou T, Tortopidis D, Kontonasaki E. The effect of fer- rule on the fracture mode of endodontically treated canines restored with fibre posts and metal-ceramic or all-ceramic crowns[J]. Journal of dentistry, 2012, 40(4): 276-285.
  • 3Pereira J R, de Ornelas F, Conti P C, et al. EIfect of a crown ferrule on the fracture resistance of endodonticaily treated teeth restored with prefabricated posts[J]. Journal of Pros- thetic Dentistry, 2006, 95(1): 50-54.
  • 4Silva N R, Raposo L H A, Versluis A. The effect of post, core, crown type, and ferrule presence on the biomechanical behavior of endodontically treated bovine anterior teeth[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2010, 104(5): 306-317.
  • 5Buttel L, Krastl G, Lorch H. Influence of post fit and post length on fracture resistance[J]. Int Endod J, 2009, 42 (1): 47-53.
  • 6Cobankara F K, Orucoglu H, Ozkan H B, et al. Effect of immediate and delayed post preparation on apical microleak- age by using methacrylate-based EndoREZ sealer with or without accelerator [J]. Journal of Endodontics, 2008, 34 (12): 1504-1507.
  • 7Ng C C, Dumbrigue H B, A1-Bayat M I, et al. Influence of remaining coronal tooth structure location on the fracture resistance of restored endodonticaUy treated anterior teeth[J]. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 2006, 95(4) : 290-296.
  • 8Gomez-Polo M, Llido B, Rivero A, et al. A 10-year retro- spective study of the survival rate of teeth restored with metal prefabricated posts versus cast metal posts and cores[J]. Journal of Dentistry, 2010, 38(11): 916-920.
  • 9Zicari F, Van Meerbeek B, Scotti R, et al. Effect of ferrule and post placement on fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth after fatigue loading[J]. Journal of Dentistry, 2013, 41(3): 207-215.
  • 10Mattos C M A, Las Casas E B, Durra I G R, et al. Numerical analysis of the biomechanical behaviour of a weakened root after ashesive reconstruction and post-core rehabilitation[J]. Journal of Dentistry, 2012, 40(5).. 423-432.

二级参考文献9

  • 1谭建国,冯敏.两种桩系统修复对根管治疗牙强度的影响[J].现代口腔医学杂志,2005,19(1):10-12. 被引量:39
  • 2胡书海,長田貴幸,割田研司,川和忠治.不同材质桩核修复漏斗状残根的抗疲劳强度[J].中华口腔医学杂志,2005,40(4):287-290. 被引量:20
  • 3侯秀娟,高旭,杨丕山,刘翠玲,马晓妮.两种桩核修复系统对残根抗折性能的影响[J].口腔颌面修复学杂志,2007,8(2):133-135. 被引量:24
  • 4Ichim I,Kuzmanovic DV,Love RM.A finite element analysis of ferrule design on restoration resistance and distribution of stress within a root[J].Int Endod J,2006,39(6):443-452.
  • 5Akkayan B.An in vitro study evaluating the effect of ferrule length on fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with fiber-reinforced and zirconia dowel systems[J].J Prosthet Dent,2004,92(2):155-162.
  • 6Anthony G,Gegauff.Effect of crown lengthening and ferrule placement on static load failure of cemented cast post-cores and crowns[J].J Prosthet Dent,2001,85(1):96-98.
  • 7Sorensen JA,Engelman MJ.Ferrule design and fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth[J].J Prosthet Dent,1990,63(5):529-536.
  • 8Ishigami K,Kurasawa I,Yamaguchi T.Problems and possibility of resin abutment construction with a combined use of fiber posts:at the beginning of discussion[J].Nihon Hotetsu Shika Gakkai Zasshi,2006,50(2):145-165.
  • 9聂二民,张春元,陈霞云,鲁洁,杜发亮,亓莉莉.残根牙体剩余量对纤维桩核全冠修复体力学性能的影响[J].口腔颌面修复学杂志,2009,10(1):5-8. 被引量:26

共引文献17

同被引文献102

引证文献8

二级引证文献30

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部