期刊文献+

硫酰氟熏蒸4种媒介致死顺序与影响因素研究 被引量:3

Sequencing absolute lethal dose of Sulfuryl Fluoride fumigation against four vectors and its influencing factors
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的研究硫酰氟对蚊、家蝇、蜚蠊和鼠熏蒸绝对致死顺序及温度、湿度等因素对熏蒸致死效果的影响,以指导实际应用。方法蚊、家蝇和蜚蠊每个浓度梯度选用50只供试成虫,小鼠、SD大鼠每个浓度梯度选用10只,熏蒸24h,进行连续观察,实时记录其死亡情况。固定硫酰氟的用量和熏蒸时间,调节环境温度、湿度,观察媒介的死亡情况。在相同的实验条件下,观察蚊、蜚蠊不同种致死量的差异。结果硫酰氟熏蒸蚊、家蝇、蜚蠊和鼠24h绝对致死顺序为:蚊(1.099g/m3)<家蝇(1.520g/m3)<蜚蠊(3.817g/m3)<小鼠(3.874g/m3)<大鼠(5.122g/m3)。温度、湿度影响硫酰氟对4种媒介的熏蒸致死率。硫酰氟熏不同蚊种和不同蜚蠊种间致死量无明显差异。结论本研究结果对指导口岸处理集装箱个案化用药具有参考作用。 Objective To explore the absolute lethal dose(LD100) sequence of Sulfuryl Fluoride fumigation against mosquitoes, flies, cockroachs, Kunming mice and rats for the guidandance of practical application. Methods The trial were carried out in a transparent simulating container with 50 mosquitoes, flies, cockroachs and 10 Kunming mice, 10 SD rats in each dose group being fumigated for 24h. The influencing factors of fumigating durations, temperature , humidity and different species of mosquito, cockroach was performed to observe vectors absolute lethal dose. Results Absolute lethal dose(LD,00 Sequence) of sulfuryl fluoride against flies, mosquitoes, cockroachs, Kunming mice, SD rats were 1.099 g/m3 〈 1.520 g/m3〈 3.817 g/m3〈3.874 g/m3 〈5.122 g/m3 respectively. While different levels of temperature and humidity had influence on the lethal effect of Sulfuryl Fluoride, it had no significant difference between different species of mosquito and cockroach. Conclusion The findings is helpful for the individualized dosage selection when useing Sulfuryl Fluoride fumigates containers with multiple vectors coexisting.
出处 《中国国境卫生检疫杂志》 CAS 2013年第5期326-329,共4页 Chinese Journal of Frontier Health and Quarantine
基金 国家质检总局科研基金项目(2010IK223) 中国检科院基本科研项目(2012JK017)
关键词 硫酰氟 熏蒸 家蝇 蜚蠊 Sulfuryl fluoride Fumigation Mosquito Fly Cockroach Rat
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献25

  • 1王银淑,刘永超,纪伟华,黄润秋,董希阳,柴有新.肟醚类拟除虫菊酯对德国小蠊的杀虫活性研究[J].医学动物防制,1989,5(1):37-38. 被引量:1
  • 2徐国淦,姜盛杰.硫酰氟在我国发展和防治仓储害虫的研究[J].粮油仓储科技通讯,2006,22(2):39-43. 被引量:10
  • 3何上虹 梁铁麟 等.蜚蠊抗性测定初报[J].昆虫知识,1986,23(3):127-127.
  • 4梁权.熏蒸防止害虫手册[M].北京:科学普及出版社,1984.68-70.
  • 5[1]Welker J, Rowley J, Hindes D. Update on the development of sulfuryl fluoride as an altermative to methyl bromide[C]. Annual International Research Conference on Methyl Bromide Alternatives and Emissions Reductions, Orlando, Florida. 2000,85,1-85.
  • 6[2]Extension Toxicology Network. Sulfuryl fluoride. Cooperative Extension at Comell Univ, Michigan State Univ, Oregon State Univ, and Univ, of California at Davis.
  • 7[3]Robert E, Willians, Brian M, et al. Enhanced fumigation efficacy as a methyl bromide alternative: Case studies with sulfury fluoride.
  • 8[4]Longstreth J, Gruijl F R de, Kripke ML, et al. Health risks[ J]. Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology B: Biology, 1998,46: 20-39.
  • 9[5]Michele R, Derrick, Helen D Burgess, el al. Sulfuryl fluoride (VIKANE) :A review of its use as a fumigant[J]. Journal of the American Institute for Conservation, 1990,29( 1 ) :77-90.
  • 10[6]U S EPA. Structural fumigation using sulfuryl fluoride: DowElanco's VikaneTM gas fumigant[M]. Methyl bromide alteruative case study. 430- R- 96-021. Washington, D. C. (Dec.).

共引文献66

同被引文献21

引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部