期刊文献+

双向倒刺可吸收线在后腹腔镜肾盂输尿管成形术中的应用 被引量:3

Application of bidirectional barbed absorbable suture in retroperitoneoscopic pyeloureteroplasty
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 探讨双向倒刺可吸收线在后腹腔镜肾盂输尿管成形术的安全性及可行性.方法 2011年3月至2013年6月,我院共实施35例腹腔镜肾盂输尿管成形术,其中采用普通5-0可吸收线行成形缝合术21例(A组),采用双向倒刺可吸收线缝合14例(B组).A组男12例,女9例,年龄6~18岁,平均年龄14.6岁;B组男8例,女7例.年龄7~ 25岁,平均年龄16.8岁.所有病例均经B超、三维CT尿路成像(CTU)或核磁共振水成像(MRU)检查确诊为肾盂输尿管交界处狭窄.结果 35例后腹腔镜肾盂输尿管成形手术全部顺利完成,无1例中转开放,未出现大血管或邻近脏器损伤等术中并发症.A组手术时间为(79.5±21.4) min.术中出血量为(18.5±21.2) ml;B组手术时间为(61.3±13.1)min.术中出血量为(20.4±21.1)ml;术中均未输血.A组缝合时间为(22.4±3.2) min;B组缝合时间为(11.6±2.7) min.术后住院天数两组均在5~7d,平均6d.随访时间年龄l ~28个月,A组有1例患者术后尿漏,引流3d后自行恢复.两组患者随访B超复查均无再发狭窄病例、无缝线结石生成病例.结论 双向倒刺可吸收线在后腹腔镜肾盂输尿管成形术中应用能够明显缩短缝合时间,具有较好的安全性和可行性. ObJective To investigate the safety and feasibility of bidirectional barbed absorbable suture application in retroperitoneoseopie pyeloureteroplasty. Methods Between March 2011 and June 2013, 35 eases of retroperitoneoscopic pyeloureteroplasty were performed in our hospital: 5/0 adsorbable su- ture was used in 21 eases (group A), and bidirectional barbed absorbable suture was used in 14 eases (group B). In group A, there were 12 males and 9 females aged 6-18 years (mean 14. 6 years). In group B, there were 8 males and 7 females aged 7-25 years (mean 16. 8 years). All cases were diagnosed as having ureteropelvic junction stricture by B-ultrasound, three dimensional CT urography (CTU) or magnetic reso- nance urography ( MRU ). Methods All 35 cases of retroperitoneoscopic pyeloureteroplasty were successfully performed, without conversion to open surgery and important intraoperative complications. In group A, the operative time was (79. 5 ± 21.4) min, the blood loss was (18.5 ± 21.2) ml, and suture time was (22. 4± 3.2) rain. In group B, the operative time was (61.3± 13.1 ) min, the blood loss was ( 120. 4 ±21.1 ) ml, and suture time was ( 11.6 ± 2. 7) min, without operative blood transfusion. In two groups, hospital stay was 5-7 days ( mean 6 days). The follow-up duration was 1 to 28 months. No re-stenosis of ureter was found any more, and there was no sutures calculi also. Conclusion The application of bidirectional barbed absorbable suture in retroperitoneoscopic pyeloureteroplasty could shorten suture time and warm-ischemia time, with good safety and feasibility, and is worthy_ of being applicated generally in clinic.
出处 《中华实验外科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2013年第11期2438-2440,共3页 Chinese Journal of Experimental Surgery
关键词 双向倒刺可吸收线 后腹腔镜 肾盂输尿管成形术 Bidirectional barbed absorbables suture line Retroperitoneoscopy Pyelouretero-plasty
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献17

  • 1邬善敏,方伟,赫杰,谭海燕.可吸收生物缝合线在普外科中的应用[J].中华实验外科杂志,2004,21(12):1570-1571. 被引量:10
  • 2Baldwin DD, Dunbar JA, Wells N, et al. Single-center comparison of laparoscopic pyeloplasty, Acucise endopyelotomy, and open pyeloplasty. J Endourol, 2003, 17(3): 155-160.
  • 3Troxel S, Das S, Helfer E, et al. Laparoscopy versus dorsal lumbotomy for ureteropelvic junction obstruction repair. J Urol, 2006, 176 (3): 1073-1076.
  • 4O'Reilly PH, Brooman PJ, Mak S, et al. The long-term results of Anderson-Hynes pyeloplasty. BJU Int, 2001, 87(4): 287-289.
  • 5Bauer J J, Bishoff JT, Moore RG, et al. Laparoscopic versus open pyeloplasty: assessment of objective and subjective outcome. J Urol, 1999, 162(3 Pt 1): 692-695.
  • 6Moore RG, Averch TD, Schulam PG, et al.Laparoscopic pyeloplasty: experience with the initial 30 cases. J Urol, 1997, 157(2): 459-462.
  • 7Hemal AK, Goel R, Goel A. Cost-effective laparoscopic pyeloplasty: single center experience. J Urol, 2003, 10(11): 563-568.
  • 8Eden CG. Minimally invasive treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction: a critical analysis of results. Eur Urol, 2007, 52 (4): 983 -989.
  • 9El Shazly MA, Moon DA, Eden CG. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty: status and review of literature. Endourol J, 2007, 21(7): 673-678.
  • 10Rassweiler JJ, Teber D, Frede T. Complications of laparoscopic pyeloplasty. World J Urol, 2008, 26(6): 539-547.

共引文献31

同被引文献29

  • 1李宏召,张旭,黄定平,吴振启,马鑫,郑涛.后腹腔镜与开放离断肾盂成形术的临床效果比较[J].临床泌尿外科杂志,2005,20(9):517-520. 被引量:18
  • 2祖雄兵,齐琳,张旭,叶章群,周四维,申鹏飞.后腹腔镜肾盂成形术13例临床分析[J].中国内镜杂志,2006,12(3):270-272. 被引量:11
  • 3郭子健,李莉华,过建工,周鹏,戴赛民,张勇.术中置自制新型鼻胆管、胆总管一期缝合在胆总管探查术中的应用[J].中华肝胆外科杂志,2006,12(8):527-529. 被引量:16
  • 4李龙承 张旭主译.泌尿外科手术图谱[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,1996.17-32.
  • 5关志忱,梅骅译.泌尿外科手术图谱[M].2版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2005:169.
  • 6OReilly PH,Brooman PJ,Mak S,et al.The longterm results of Ander-son-Hynes pyeloplasty[J].BJU Int,2001,87(4):287-289.
  • 7Symons SJ,Bhirud PS,Jain V,et al.Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty:oumewgold standard[J].J Endourol,2009,23(3):463-467.
  • 8Moon DA,El-Shazly MA,Chang CM,et al.Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty:e-volution of a nem gold standard[J].Urology,2006,67(5):932-936.
  • 9LUND, CO, L NILAS, N BANGSGAARD, et al. Persistent ec- topic pregnancy after linear salpingotomy: a non-predictable com- plication to conservative surgery for tubal gestation [J]. Acta Ob- stetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 2002, 81(11): 1053-1059.
  • 10FUJISHITA A, KN KHAN, M KITAJIMA, et al. Re-evaluation of the indication for and limitation of laparoscopic salpingotomy for tubal pregnancy [J]. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gyne- cology and Reproductive Biology, 2008, 137(2): 210-216.

引证文献3

二级引证文献20

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部